BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2256
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 5, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 2256 (Huffman) - As Amended:  April 12, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Business,  
          Professions and Consumer Protection           Vote: 6-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill prohibits a consumer product from being labeled as  
          "flushable" if it fails to meet certain standards.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Effective January 1, 2012, prohibits a person from packaging  
            or labeling a product as "flushable," "sewer and septic safe"  
            or a similar such phrase, unless the product has been tested  
            and certified by a third party to meet the acceptance criteria  
            for toilet, drainline, sewage pump, septic tank, aerobic  
            system, and municipal wastewater collection and treatment  
            systems clearance as published in the Guidance Document for  
            Assessing the Flushability of Nonwoven Consumer Products,  
            published by the Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry  
            (INDA).

          2)Makes violation punishable by a fine of up to $2,500.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Negligible state costs, if any.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  The author reports that sanitary districts and  
            agencies around the state have major problems at their  
            treatment plants with "flushable" products.  Many product  
            packaging claims the products "break up like toilet paper" or  
            are "sewer and septic safe," the author says.  The author  
            notes that many of these products, despite their labels, do  
            not disperse or decompose well in the sewer systems.  As a  








                                                                  AB 2256
                                                                  Page  2

            result, they clog apparatus at sewage treatment plants. The  
            author contends it in the interests of manufacturers,  
            retailers, consumers, regulators and wastewater treatment  
            authorities and operators that there be clear direction from  
            the state on what defines flushability to avoid harm to septic  
            systems and clogging of pipes, pumps and municipal facilities.

           2)Background  .  According to the policy committee analysis, in  
            the 1980s, wipes advertised as "flushable" first appeared on  
            the market.  Since then, claims of "flushable" products have  
            proliferated.  There are no state or federal definitions of  
            "flushable."

            In 2008 INDA published the first edition of its Guidance  
            Document.  The document presents criteria to determine a  
            product's flushability:  it must clear toilets and properly  
            maintained drainage pipe systems under expected product usage  
            conditions, be compatible with existing wastewater conveyance,  
            treatment, reuse, and disposal systems, and become  
            unrecognizable in a reasonable period of time and be safe in  
            the natural environment.  INDA reports that Guidance Document  
            standards have been widely adopted by the flushable moist wipe  
            industry.

           3)Support  .  The bill is supported by numerous local governments  
            and sanitation, sewage and water districts, who are concerned  
            by costs resulting from clogging of and damage to sewage  
            systems caused by products place in the system by consumers  
            who believe them to be "flushable." 

           4)Opposition.   The bill is opposed by some industry groups,  
            including the California Chamber of Commerce, who argue most  
            clogging comes from consumers flushing products not labeled as  
            "flushable" and that the producer never intended to be  
            flushed.  These opponents prefer delaying legislative action  
            until INDA meets with municipal wastewater treatment facility  
            officials to understand causes and explore non-legislative  
            solutions to problems at treatment facilities.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081