BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                               AB 2264
                                                               Page  1

       CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
       AB 2264 (De Leon)
       As Amended  August 2, 2010
       Majority vote
        
        ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
       |ASSEMBLY:  |49-25|(June 2, 2010)  |SENATE: |21-13|(August 18,    |
       |           |     |                |        |     |2010)          |
        ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         
        Original Committee Reference:    PUB. S.  

        SUMMARY  :  Prohibits the garnishment of a bank account or the earnings  
       of a homeless youth for failure to pay fees, fines, forfeitures, or  
       other penalties imposed by a court due to the violation of a state or  
       local law related to truancy, loitering, curfew violations, or illegal  
       lodging.  

        The Senate amendments  :

       1)Allow the court to engage in other lawful debt collection activities  
         outside the enactment of this statute. 

       2)Specify that courts are not required to perform any further  
         investigation or financial screening into any matter beyond the scope  
         of its regular duties. 

       3)Provide that the Judicial Council shall not be prevented from  
         altering any best practices or recommendations for collection  
         programs. 

       4)Make technical and non-substantive changes.

        AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill was substantially similar to the  
       version passed by the Senate.

        FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations Committee,  
       pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

        COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Homeless youth are not homeless by  
       choice.  Approximately half are former foster youth who have been  
       emancipated into the streets; the rest are forced from their homes by  
       abuse or are kicked out.

       "Homeless youth are often ticketed for 'quality of life' offenses such  
       as loitering, truancy, illegal lodging, and curfew violations.  When  







                                                               AB 2264
                                                               Page  2

       they cannot pay the fines, sometimes their wages and/or bank accounts  
       are garnished, making it harder for the nearly half of homeless youth  
       who have jobs and are working to try to end their homelessness.  And,  
       by making it harder for homeless youth to obtain homes by their own  
       hard work, garnishment actually promotes the behaviors (loitering,  
       illegal lodging, etc.) the tickets are intended to dissuade.

       "AB 2264 seeks to provide some much-needed relief for former foster  
       youth and other youth who have been forced into homelessness and are  
       trying to work their way out of sleeping on the streets.  Homeless  
       youth would still be required to pay the original fines for these  
       'quality of life' offenses, but orders to garnish bank accounts or  
       earnings would be prohibited for homeless youth under 25 years old."

       Please see the policy committee for a full discussion of this bill.


        Analysis Prepared by  :    Nicole J. Hanson / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744  
       FN: 0005518