BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2276
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 21, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

               AB 2276 (Fletcher) - As Introduced:  February 18, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to make  
          information from the arson registry, which consists of a signed  
          statement by the convicted individual and that individual's  
          photograph and fingerprint, available to all "chief fire  
          officials of legally organized fire department or fire  
          protection districts in the state." 

          (Current law limits provision of this information to peace  
          officers, which includes arson investigators, but not fire  
          chiefs.)

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)As the bill does not clearly define "chief fire officials," or  
            specify the method of providing this information, the costs of  
            this measure could range from minor local costs to establish  
            electronic case-by-case request protocols, to several million  
            dollars in nonreimbursable local costs to support provide  
            dedicated data lines for local fire officials. 

            (Currently law enforcement accesses the information via a  
            secure law enforcement website, which includes access to the  
            state sex offender registry.)

          2)One-time costs in the range of $150,000 (GF) to DOJ to  
            establish system protocols.    

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.  The author contends providing arson registry  








                                                                  AB 2276
                                                                  Page  2

            information to firefighters in addition to law enforcement  
            officers would enhance arson prevention efforts. 
           
          2)Current law  requires any person convicted of arson or  
            attempted arson, as specified, to register with the local  
            chief of police or sheriff. Registration is for life, unless  
            the offender was a minor adjudicated as a ward of the court,  
            in which case registration is required until  age 25. Failure  
            to register is a misdemeanor. Only peace officers may access  
            registration information. There are about 3,700 registered  
            arsonists.  

           3)Concerns  . The author's office has agreed to address a series  
            of concerns while the bill is on the Suspense File.

             a)   The problem addressed by this bill is not clear. How  
               will the expansion of access to arson registry information  
               help prevent arson? Current law provides access to this  
               information to peace officer arson investigators of fire  
               departments. It is not clear how or why this is not  
               sufficient. 

             b)   DOJ's CA Sex and Arson Registry (CSAR), formerly the  
               Violent Crime and Information Network, (VCIN)), includes  
               both the arson and sex offender registries, which makes  
               providing access to non-peace officers problematic.

             c)   The universe of "all chief fire officials" who could  
               access the arson registry should be clarified.  

             d)   The method of providing information needs to be  
               clarified, particularly as this is the cost driver. 

             e)   The expanded access proposed by this bill should be  
               cross-referenced in subdivision (j). 

           


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081