BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2293
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 12, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 2293 (Torres) - As Amended:  April 20, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Housing and  
          Community Development                         Vote: 8 - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill gives the Department of Housing and Community  
          Development (HCD) authority to contract with construction  
          lenders, or reserve funds for awards for certain programs.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Allows HCD to contract with a construction lender to make  
            permanent loan funds available for a project during the  
            construction period.

          2)Allows HCD to reserve or set aside funds for a project in an  
            escrow account to be used as collateral for private  
            construction lenders willing to make construction loans. 

          3)Allows the alternate financing to be used for the following  
            programs:

             a)   The Multifamily Housing Program (MHP). 
             b)   Transit-Oriented Development Program (TOD)
             c)   Joe Serna, Jr. Farmworker Grant Program (Serna) 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Up-front GF administrative costs of up to $100,000 for HCD to  
            create the bid process and work with interested lenders on the  
            construction loan option created by this bill.  Ongoing costs  
            would likely be absorbable within existing HCD resources.

          2)Up-front administrative costs of up to $50,000 for HCD to  
            develop the escrow program.  On-going costs would likely be  
            absorbable within existing resources.








                                                                  AB 2293
                                                                  Page  2


          3)Costs for the State Controller's Office to manage the escrow  
            accounts would be minor and absorbable within existing  
            resources. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale .  According to the author, when the Pooled Money  
            Investment Board froze Propositions 46 and 1C bond funds in  
            2008 it drove construction lenders away from the lending  
            market for developments funded by those bond funds. This bill  
            is intended to create two new vehicles for providing these  
            bond funds to developers.  The bill allows HCD to contract  
            directly with private lenders to make construction loans using  
            the bond money.  Alternatively, the bill allows HCD to place  
            bond proceeds in an escrow account to be used as collateral  
            for construction loans. 

            The sponsors, Housing California, note that prior to the  
            freeze, lenders made construction loans trusting the state  
            would keep its commitment to pay off the loans with permanent  
            "take out" financing. When the state stopped selling bonds in  
            an effort to conserve the state's cash, lenders lost  
            confidence that permanent financing would be available.   
            Despite the freeze being lifted, lenders appear to be  
            reluctant to return to the market. 

           2)HCD Program Financing  . The MHP, TOD, and Serna program provide  
            permanent long-term financing for affordable projects in the  
            form of deferred payment loans at low interest rates.  Funding  
            for these projects is provided once the project is complete,  
            to pay off the construction loan, and provide enough permanent  
            subsidies for the project to make the units affordable.  

           3)Key Issue  . This bill would require General Obligation (GO)  
            bonds to be issued and held in escrow while an affordable  
            housing project is being constructed.  GO Bonds would be  
            issued prior to construction starting, two or three years in  
            advance of the construction loan coming due.  That money would  
            be tied to a specific construction project and the state would  
            be paying debt service during the construction period which  
            may be problematic on several levels.  First, because this  
            money will sit in escrow for a specific project, the bond  
            proceeds cannot be used in the interim for any other  
            short-term purpose (i.e. paying off prior loan or getting  








                                                                  AB 2293
                                                                  Page  3

            another project up and running.)  Second, the state will pay  
            debt service while the money is sitting idle in an escrow  
            account.  The escrow account would earn interest but the rate  
            of return on the Pooled Money Investment Account (0.588% as of  
            April 2010) is less than what the state would pay in debt  
            service.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081