BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2301
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 27, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 2301 (Logue) - As Amended:  April 27, 2010  

          Policy Committee:                              Natural  
          ResourcesVote:9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires each "state public land agency" to establish  
          a permitting process to potentially allow right of entry on to  
          public lands to a person seeking to maintain defensible space  
          around that person's property.  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Defines a "state public land agency" as the Department of  
            Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of Parks and  
            Recreation, State Lands Commission, Department of  
            Transportation, or Department of Water Resources.

          2)Allows a state public lands management agency to require an  
            applicant to maintain insurance in a form and amount  
            determined by the agency and directs the agency to require an  
            applicant to indemnify the state from claims against the state  
            as a direct or indirect result of the issuance of a  
            right-of-entry permit.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time costs to Department of Forestry and Fire Protection,  
            Department of Parks and Recreation, State Lands Commission,  
            Department of Transportation, and Department of Water  
            Resources to develop a permitting process as directed by this  
            bill.  Collectively, the cost of this development work may  
            exceed $180,000 dollars (various special funds).

          2)Ongoing costs of a minor amount, likely less than $150,000  
            yearly, to each of the state public land agencies, and  
            recoverable through fees paid by the permitees, to evaluate  
            permit requests from individual landowners, issue permits,  








                                                                  AB 2301
                                                                  Page  2

            request liability waivers, verify insurance, and monitor  
            vegetation management work (various special funds).

           COMMENTS 

           1)Rationale  .  The author contends it critical to fire safety  
            that residents be permitted to cross on to state lands to  
            perform key fire prevention tasks.  This bill was  
            substantially amended in policy committee to provide a  
            permitting system that would, at the permitting agency's  
            discretion, allow right of entry on public land to maintain  
            permissible space.

           2)Background  .  Existing law generally requires a person who  
            owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains an occupied  
            dwelling or structure in, upon, or adjoining any mountainous  
            area or land covered in forests, brush, grass, or any land  
            covered with flammable material to maintain defensible space  
            of 100 feet from each side of a structure but not beyond the  
            property line.  Law also allows an insurance company that  
            insures an occupied structure to require defensible space  
            greater than a 100 feet perimeter if a fire expert, designated  
            by an applicable fire official, finds that such a clearing is  
            necessary to significantly reduce the risk of transmission of  
            flame or heat sufficient to ignite the structure, and there is  
            no other feasible mitigation possible to reduce the risk of  
            ignition or spread of wildfire to the structure.  The greater  
            distance may not be beyond the property line unless authorized  
            by state or local laws.

           3)Support  .  As introduced, this bill was supported by the  
            Regional Council of Rural Counties (RCRC).

           4)Opposition  .  As introduced, this bill was opposed by several  
            conservation and environmental organizations.  It is unclear  
            whether these groups remain opposed to the bill, which was  
            substantially amended in policy committee.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081