BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2311
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 28, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 2311 (Mendoza) - As Amended:  April 19, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural  
          ResourcesVote:9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the executive officer (EO) of the Air  
          Resources Board to conduct three reviews of the Low Carbon Fuel  
          Standard (LCFS) regulation.  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires the EO to review the LCFS regulation by January 1 of  
            2012, 2015 and 2018.

          2)Specifies topics to be covered by the reviews, such as (a)  
            progress against targets, (b) necessary adjustments to the  
            compliance schedule, (c) life-cycle assessments, (d)  
            cost-effectiveness, and (e) the effect of the regulation on  
            state revenues, consumers, economic growth, public health and  
            air quality.

          3)Directs the EO to establish the LCFS advisory panel consisting  
            of specified governmental and private representatives, to  
            participate in the periodic reviews of the LCFS regulation.

          4)Requires the EO to conduct the periodic reviews in a public  
            process that includes at least two public workshops for each  
            review period.

           FISCAL EFFECT 

          One-time costs of about $500,000 to ARB in 2016-17 and 2017-18  
          in preparation of the 2018 review (Air Pollution Control Fund).

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  The author and sponsors contend this bill will  








                                                                  AB 2311
                                                                  Page  2

            provide necessary oversight for ARB's development of the  
            far-reaching and potentially costly LCFS, which has been  
            authorized not by an act of the Legislature but by executive  
            order and ARB regulation. 

           2)Background  .

              a)   AB 32 and the LCFS  .  AB 32 (N??ez, Chapter 455, Statutes  
               of 2006) requires California to limit its emissions of GHGs  
               so that, by 2020, those emissions are equal to what they  
               were in 1990. To that end, AB 32 requires ARB to quantify  
               the state's 1990 GHG emissions and to adopt, by January 1,  
               2009, a "scoping plan" that describes the board's plan for  
               achieving the maximum technologically feasible and  
               cost-effective reductions of GHG emissions reductions by  
               2020.   

                In 2007, Governor Schwarzenegger issued Executive Order  
               S-1-07, calling for a reduction of at least 10 % in the  
               carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by  
               2020.  The order directed ARB to consider initiating  
               regulatory proceedings to establish and implement the LCFS.  
                

               In keeping with AB 32, ARB adopted its AB 32 scoping plan  
               in December of 2008.  Included in the scoping plan was the  
               LCFS, which ARB adopted as a regulation in 2009.  Like this  
               bill, the LCFS regulation includes provisions for review,  
               one in 2012 and another in 2015, though not for review of  
               the regulation in 2018.

           3)Support.   This bill is supported by the California Trucking  
            Association and the Western State Petroleum Association, who  
            cosponsor the bill, as well as the California Chamber of  
            Commerce.

           4)Opposition  .  As introduced, this bill was opposed by numerous  
            public health and environmental organizations.  It appears  
            that this opposition has been removed after amendments to the  
            bill taken in the policy committee.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081