BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2510
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 12, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 2510 (Fletcher) - As Amended: April 27, 2010
Policy Committee: P.E.R. &
S.S.Vote: 6-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes the City of San Diego to contract with
CalPERS to provide retiree health care benefits for its
employees based on the terms set forth in the collective
bargaining agreement reached between the city and certain of its
employees. The bill applies to employees that:
1)Have at least 10 years active service with the city.
2)Retire after the date the governing memorandum of
understanding is signed.
3)Are members of the San Diego Police Officers Association or
are unclassified or unrepresented employees of the city.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Cost-neutral to CalPERS, as premiums and administrative costs
are paid by the contracting agency.
2)Reduction in costs to San Diego, to the extent that CalPERS'
negotiated rates with providers and administrative costs are
lower than the city's.
COMMENTS
1)Background . Existing law establishes the Public Employees'
Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) under the
administration of CalPERS. A contracting agency (city,
counties, or special districts) electing to contract with
CalPERS is subject to legal requirements regarding employer
AB 2510
Page 2
contribution amounts (a minimum of 10 years service to vest
for 50% of normal employer contribution rates, rising up to
100% of employer contribution rates at 20 years), and
dependent coverage (at least 90% of the primary coverage
rate).
2)Rationale . This bill is intended to allow the City of San
Diego to contract with CalPERS for retiree health care under
the terms set forth in the MOU with its peace officers. These
terms differ from state law, in that they could involve a
shorter full vesting period (10 years instead of 20 years) and
a lower reimbursement rate for dependents. According to the
author, contracting with CalPERS will save the city money
because the larger state pool spreads risk and lowers cost,
its administrative overhead costs are lower, and it has more
market power to negotiate with health care providers.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081