BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2510
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2510 (Fletcher)
          As Amended April 27, 2010
          Majority vote 

           PUBLIC EMPLOYEES    6-0         APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Torrico, Harkey,          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Conway, Ammiano, |
          |     |Furutani, Hernandez, Ma,  |     |Bradford, Coto, Davis,    |
          |     |Nestande                  |     |Hill, Hall, Harkey,       |
          |     |                          |     |Miller, Nielsen, Norby,   |
          |     |                          |     |Skinner, Solorio,         |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson, Torrico        |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :   Provides the City of San Diego (City) with the  
          ability to establish a vesting requirement for post-retirement  
          health benefits coverage that is different than what is allowed  
          under current law for contracting agencies.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :

          1)Allows the City, together with the employees' exclusive  
            representative and unrepresented employees, to agree to an  
            employer contribution for retiree healthcare subject to the  
            following requirements:

             a)   The number of years of service the employee has with the  
               City; and,

             b)   Mutually agreed to through a memorandum of understanding  
               (MOU).  However, this issue would be specifically excluded  
               from being subject to the impasse procedures contained in  
               existing collective bargaining laws.

          2)Specifies that this provision does not apply to any employee  
            who retired prior to the effective date of the MOU.  

          3)Prohibits any agreement reached from providing an employer  
            contribution for retiree healthcare for employees with less  
            than 10 years of service with the City.  

          4)Requires the City to provide the California Public Employees'  
            Retirement System (CalPERS) with notification of the agreement  








                                                                  AB 2510
                                                                  Page  2


            and any additional information they require.

          5)Specifies that the bill only applies to members of the San  
            Diego Police Officers Association or unclassified or  
            unrepresented employees of the city. 

           EXISTING LAW  establishes the Public Employees' Medical and  
          Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) under the administration of CalPERS.   
          If a contracting agency elects to cover their employees for  
          health care under PEMHCA, they have the following options to  
          choose from in determining contribution amount for annuitants:

          1)A contracting agency could opt to make the employer  
            contribution amount equal for both active employees and  
            annuitants.  Under this option, an employee who retires and  
            meets the definition of annuitant becomes 100% vested and  
            receives an employer contribution amount equal to what the  
            active employees receive.

          2)A contracting agency that joins PEMHCA on or after January 1,  
            1986, has the option to pay a lesser employer contribution  
            amount for annuitants than for active employees as long as the  
            agency increases its contribution for annuitants each year  
            until it equals the agency's contributions for active  
            employees.  Based on the formula, it may take 20 years for the  
            lesser contribution amount to equal the active employee  
            contribution amount.  Under this option, an employee who  
            retires and meets the definition of annuitant becomes 100%  
            vested and receives an employer contribution amount equal to  
            the lesser contribution amount.

          3)A contracting agency has the option to establish a pre-set  
            "vesting schedule" of specific percentages based on an  
            employee's credited years of service to determine the employer  
            contribution amount for annuitants.  Under this option, an  
            employee would have to work at least 10 years to qualify for  
            an employee contribution and would have to work 20 years to  
            become 100% vested.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)Cost-neutral to CalPERS, as premiums and administrative costs  
            are paid by the contracting agency.








                                                                  AB 2510
                                                                  Page  3



          2)Reduction in costs to San Diego, to the extent that CalPERS'  
            negotiated rates with providers and administrative costs are  
            lower than the city's.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "The City of San Diego  
          currently provides healthcare to its employees and retired  
          annuitants through its own local system.  The city pays for the  
          cost of employees and their dependents and covers only the  
          healthcare cost of the retired annuitant; the vested benefit  
          plan requires out of pocket payment by the retiree for any  
          dependents they wish to cover.  Currently, the outstanding  
          retiree healthcare liability for retirees in San Diego is $157  
          million - the city pays $28.5 million annually to fund retiree  
          healthcare.

          "Cost to provide healthcare are more expensive through the San  
          Diego-only systems versus through the state's PEMHCA system for  
          a number of reasons: 1. the larger state pool spreads risk and  
          lowers cost, 2. San Diego's system is geographically limited so  
          retirees located elsewhere in the state or country must procure  
          more expensive coverage whereas, the state's system is a broader  
          nationwide system and 3. the administrative costs to run the  
          city's system average 3-5% of premiums; CalPERS overhead costs  
          are 0.45%.  For example, a city retiree enrolled in Kaiser who  
          wishes to purchase coverage for one dependent will pay $657  
          monthly and $1,314 for two or more dependents.  In contrast, if  
          that same employee were enrolled in PERS Kaiser he would pay  
          only $455 per month for one dependent and $910 for two or more.   
          In a study performed by Roeder Financial, the city's estimated  
          annual expenses would drop from $28.5 million to $21.5 million  
          and the outstanding healthcare liability for retirees would drop  
          from $157 million to $121 million."

          The author concludes that the provision in current law that  
          requires a local agency electing to participate in PEMHCA to  
          provide at least 90% of the cost of dependent coverage is cost  
          prohibitive to many local agencies, including the City of San  
          Diego.  This bill would allow the City of San Diego to  
          participate in PEMHCA without having to provide contributions  
          for dependents of retired annuitants.

          The Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security  
          Committee is informed that the San Diego Police Officers  








                                                                  AB 2510
                                                                  Page  4


          Association and the City recently agreed, through collective  
          bargaining, to participate in PEMHCA if the change proposed in  
          this bill is signed into law.

          This bill is similar to AB 1506 (Kuehl), Chapter 326, Statutes  
          of 1995, which authorized the Santa Monica Community College  
          District and the Mt. San Antonio Community College Districts to  
          establish their own schedule of employer contributions for  
          post-retirement health benefit coverage under PEMHCA.


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916)  
          319-3957 

                                                               FN:  0004379