BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                                                                  AB 2523
                                                                  Page A
          Date of Hearing:   April 21, 2010

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
                                Sandre Swanson, Chair
                     AB 2523 (Eng) - As Amended:  April 14, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :   Apprenticeship: electricians.

           SUMMARY  :   Makes various changes related to the certification of  
          electricians.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1 Deletes the requirement that the curriculum of classroom  
            instruction for trainees be provided under the jurisdiction of  
            the State Department of Education, the Board of Governors of  
            the California Community Colleges, or the Bureau for Private  
            Postsecondary Education.

          2)Instead specifies that the curriculum of classroom instruction  
            must be provided by one of the following:

             a)   A community college.

             b)   A state or federal apprenticeship program approved to  
               provide electrical training.

             c)   A public school district or public educational  
               institution.

             d)   A state-licensed private postsecondary institution that  
               is either under contract with a public educational  
               institution or approved and registered with the Bureau for  
               Private Postsecondary Education.

          3)Provides that continuing education instruction by an entity  
            that is not approved by Chief of the Division of  
            Apprenticeship Standards (DAS) shall be provided under the  
            jurisdiction of the State Department of Education or the Board  
            of Governors of the California Community Colleges.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires the DAS within the Department of Industrial Relations  
            (DIR) to establish and validate minimum standards for the  
            competency and training of electricians through a system of  
            testing and certification.









                                                                  AB 2523
                                                                  Page B

          2)Requires persons who perform work as electricians to become  
            certified by January 1, 2005, and prohibits uncertified  
            persons from performing electrical work for which  
            certification is required after that date.

          3)Requires uncertified persons to perform electrical work if  
            certain requirements are met, including that the person has  
            completed or is enrolled in a curriculum of classroom  
            instruction that meets certain requirements.

          4)Contains various exemptions from the certification  
            requirements.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  This bill is sponsored by the Western Electrical  
          Contractors Association (WECA-IEC) and seeks to make several  
          changes related to the certification of electricians under  
          current law.  The sponsor indicates that this bill is intended  
          to be a consensus product, and that they are working closely and  
          in collaboration with organized labor on this proposal.

           Brief History of Electrician Certification
           
          The certification requirement for electricians has a lengthy  
          legislative and administrative history.  AB 931 (Calderon),  
          Chapter # 781, Statutes of 1999, established a certification  
          program for electricians to be implemented by July 1, 2001.   
          Proponents of the original legislation stated that it was  
          designed to address electrician competency, as well as safety.   
          Proponents argued that, prior to the enactment of AB 931 no  
          state law required testing and certification of electricians who  
          performed the actual wiring and connection of electrical  
          devices.  

          The actual deadline for electrician certification has been  
          adjusted a number of times in recent years, both by statute and  
          by administrative action.  The deadline for general electricians  
          and fire/life safety technicians was January 1, 2006.  The  
          deadline for residential electricians was January 1, 2007.  The  
          deadline for voice data video technicians and non-residential  
          lighting technicians was December 31, 2008.  

           Legislative Changes Proposed by This Bill  









                                                                  AB 2523
                                                                  Page C

          This bill proposes to make several changes to current law, most  
          involving requirements related to classroom curriculum and  
          continuing education.

          Under current law, in order to perform work as an electrician a  
          person must (1) have taken and passed the electrician  
          certification examination, (2) be a registered apprentice in a  
          state-approved apprenticeship program, or (3) be an electrician  
          trainee.

          With respect to latter category (trainees) currently if a person  
          wants to perform electrical work and does not yet qualify to  
          take the certification examination due to lock of work  
          experience or related instruction, they can do so legally by  
          registering as an electrician trainee.  Under current law, such  
          training programs must be approved by a state certification  
          curriculum committee, which consists of a representative from  
          the State Department of Education, the Board of Governors of the  
          California Community Colleges, and the DAS.  In addition to the  
          curriculum approval process, before a program is allowed to  
          offer certification training, the training is required to be  
          supervised by the State Department of Education, the Board of  
          Governors of the California Community Colleges, or the Bureau  
          for Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education<1>.

          This bill would delete this latter requirement and would instead  
          specify that the curriculum of classroom instruction must be  
          provided by one of the following:

                 A community college.
                 A state or federal apprenticeship program approved to  
               provide electrical training.
             --------------------------
          <1> Current law refers to the "Bureau for Private Postsecondary  
          and Vocational Education" (BPPVE), which was a unit of the  
          Department of Consumer Affairs.  However, the BPPVE ceased  
          operations on July 1, 2007 when the legislative authority for  
          the agency expired.  In 2007, Governor Schwarzenegger signed  
          into law a bill to extend student protections at private  
          postsecondary vocational education institutions through 2008.   
          On October 11, 2009, the Governor signed AB 48 (Portantino)  
          which established the "Bureau for Private Postsecondary  
          Education" within the Department of Consumer Affairs effective  
          January 1, 2010.  This bill correctly refers to the "Bureau for  
          Private Postsecondary Education."








                                                                  AB 2523
                                                                  Page D
                 A public school district or public educational  
               institution.
                 A state-licensed private postsecondary institution that  
               is either under contract with a public educational  
               institution or approved and registered with the Bureau for  
               Private Postsecondary Education.

          In essence, this bill would permit state-approved apprenticeship  
          programs to offer certification training under their own general  
          control - without the requirement that the training be under the  
          jurisdiction of the entities mentioned above.

          In addition, the current certification framework also sets forth  
          continuing education requirements for certified electricians.   
          This bill provides that continuing education instruction by an  
          entity that is not approved by DAS shall be provided under the  
          jurisdiction of the State Department of Education or the Board  
          of Governors of the California Community Colleges.

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :

          The sponsor argues that the additional supervision of the  
          state-approved apprenticeship training programs is unnecessary  
          and increases the costs of operation as the programs have  
          already been reviewed and approved as providing quality  
          training.

          Moreover, representatives of state-approved apprenticeship  
          programs indicate that due to budget cuts and other fiscal  
          constraints, some community colleges have eliminated their  
          electrician certification programs altogether or don't offer  
          courses on a year-round basis.  Therefore, in certain geographic  
          areas an individual's only option may be to take certification  
          training with a state-approved apprenticeship program.  They  
          argue that state-approved apprenticeship programs already offer  
          high-quality classroom instruction (or contract with an approved  
          entity to do so) and that therefore the supervision required by  
          current law is duplicative and unnecessary.

          The sponsor also points out that two important quality assurance  
          measures are kept intact.  First, the apprenticeship curriculum  
          must still be submitted to the state certification curriculum  
          committee, as required under current law.  Second, education  
          providers who do not operate a state-approved apprenticeship  
          program are required to offer their training through or under  









                                                                  AB 2523
                                                                  Page E
          the jurisdiction of a community college, a public school  
          district or public educational institution, or the Bureau for  
          Private Postsecondary Education.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :

          Opponents argue that current law creates two pathways to  
          electrician certification - one through apprenticeship training  
          offered through approved apprenticeship programs and the other  
          through trainee training offered through educational entities  
          under the Department of Education, Board of Governors of the  
          California Community Colleges, or the Bureau for Private  
          Postsecondary Education.  Each path provides for oversight and  
          accountability of the programs as well as for protections to the  
          apprentices or trainees seeking certification. 
          Opponents contend that this bill would provide an alternative  
          path void of any oversight other than curricular approval  
          through a state committee.  They argue that the bill would  
          circumvent important institutional mechanisms that provide for  
          accountability and state oversight.  The oversight provided by  
          the state and accrediting bodies that monitor institutions such  
          as local community colleges ensures that the instruction and  
          training maintains its quality, that student outcomes are  
          measured, and that the institution maintains eligibility  
          requirements and standards. Opponents argue that these  
          requirements differ from the proscribed curriculum approval  
          process and provide a level of protection to students ensuring  
          they receive credit for the work they have completed and that  
          the training provided meets a certain level of quality.  They  
          state that while the curriculum committee approval provides one  
          level of oversight in this area, removing provisions that  
          certification training take place either under apprenticeship  
          training or the jurisdiction of the Department of Education,  
          community colleges, or the Bureau of Private Postsecondary  
          Education removes important protections for trainees.

           PRIOR LEGISLATION  

          SB 1362 (Margett), Chapter # 59, Statutes of 2008, authorized  
          specified disciplinary action for failure to comply with the  
          certification requirement.  SB 1362 was supported by industry  
          and labor.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   










                                                                  AB 2523
                                                                  Page F
           Support 
           
          Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) of California
          California State Association of Electrical Workers
          Western Electrical Contractors Association (WECA-IEC)

           Opposition 
           
          Los Angeles College Faculty Guild
          Los Angeles Community College District
          Los Rios Community College District

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091