BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                               
         AB 2530
                                                                Page  1

        CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
        AB 2530 (Nielsen)
        As Amended  August 25, 2010
        Majority vote
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |ASSEMBLY:  |     |(May 6, 2010)   |SENATE: |37-0 |(August 30,    |
        |           |     |                |        |     |2010)          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
             (vote not relevant)


         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
        |COMMITTEE VOTE:  |9-0  |(August 30, 2010)   |RECOMMENDATION: |concur    |
        |                 |     |                    |                |          |
         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

        Original Committee Reference:    L. GOV.  
         
        SUMMARY  :  Authorizes a county, until January 1, 2015, in any fiscal  
        year in which payments authorized for reimbursement to a county for  
        lost revenue from Williamson Act contracts is less than one-half of  
        the county's actual foregone general fund property tax revenue, to  
        revise the terms for new contracts.

         The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill, and  
        instead:

        1)Provide that if, a county determines that the state's open space  
          subventions are less than one-half of the county's actual  
          foregone general fund property tax revenue, then a county shall  
          revise the term for new contracts.

        2)Provide that if the county makes such a determination, contracts  
          shall be for a term of no less than nine years for contracts  
          currently 10 years in length or 18 years for contracts currently  
          20 years in length, as the case may be. 

        3)Specify that for new contracts entered into during a year in  
          which a county has made a determination pursuant to #1, the  
          initial contract length shall be either nine or 18 years. 

        4)Require each contract to provide, except in the initial year of  
          the determination, that on the anniversary date of the contract  








                                                               
         AB 2530
                                                                Page  2

          or such other annual date as specified by the contract, a year  
          shall be added automatically to the initial term unless notice of  
          nonrenewal is given.

        5)Specify that, if additional revenues do not occur, two additional  
          years must be added to the contracts on their next anniversary  
          date to restore them to their full 10-year and 20-year terms.

        6)Require, in any year in which the provisions of this measure are  
          implemented, a county to record a notice that states the affected  
          parcel number(s). 

        7)Require the assessor to value the property, consistent with the  
          restrictions on the property, based on the new contract. 

        8)Require the additional amount of tax revenue that results from  
          the decrease in restriction to be separately displayed on the  
          taxpayer's annual bill. 

        9)State that a landowner may elect to serve a notice of nonrenewal  
          instead of accepting a shortened contact.  

        10)Require a county to give timely written notice to Williamson Act  
          landowners regarding:

           a)   Hearings to adopt or rescind the contract and revaluation  
             provisions;

           b)   Decisions regarding the contract and revaluation  
             provisions; and,

           c)   The right to prevent contract amendments through  
             nonrenewal.

        11)Prohibit the increased valuation of the property from exceeding  
          10% of the difference between the value that reflects the  
          property's restricted use and the property's fair market value.

        12)State that if a property's fair market value is lower than its  
          restricted value, there is no revaluation.  

        13)Specify that the provisions of this measure do not apply to:

           a)   Contracts that have been nonrenewed;








                                                               
         AB 2530
                                                                Page  3


           b)   Contracts with cities;

           c)   Open space or agricultural easements;

           d)   Scenic restrictions; and,

           e)   Wildlife habitat contracts.

        14)Specify that a county cannot modify or revalue a contract unless  
          the landowner gets 90 days notice of the opportunity for  
          nonrenewal and the landowner fails to nonrenew.  

        15)State that a landowner's failure to provide notice of nonrenewal  
          is implied consent to the contract and revaluation provisions for  
          that year.

        16)Require that the increased revenues generated by properties that  
          are subject to the contract and revaluation provisions  
          established in this measure be allocated exclusively to the  
          county.

        17)Add a sunset provision, terminating the provisions of this  
          measure on January 1, 2015. 

         EXISTING LAW  :

        1)Authorizes, pursuant to Article 13, section 8 of the California  
          Constitution, the Legislature to promote the conservation,  
          preservation and continued existence of open space lands and  
          provides that when these lands are enforceably restricted to  
          recreation, enjoyment of scenic beauty, use or conservation of  
          natural resources, or production of food or fiber, they must be  
          valued for property tax purposes only on a basis that is  
          consistent with these restrictions and uses.

        2)Creates the Williamson Act, also known as the California Land  
          Conservation Act of 1965, which authorizes cities and counties to  
          enter into agricultural land preservation contracts with  
          landowners who agree to restrict the use of their land for a  
          minimum of 10 years in exchange for lower assessed valuations for  
          property tax purposes.  The Division of Land Resource Protection  
          in the Department of Conservation administers the Act.









                                                               
         AB 2530
                                                                Page  4

         AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill:

        1)Authorized an advisory board, in addition to advising on the  
          administration of the agricultural preserves in the county or  
          city, to advise the city or county on any matters relating to  
          Williamson Act contracts, including, but not limited to, the  
          following:

           a)   Program benefits;

           b)   Costs; 

           c)   Amendments; and,

           d)   Landowner participation. 

        2)Stated that the advisory board process is not the only means by  
          which a board of supervisors (board) or city council (council)  
          may address agricultural preserve matters or receive advice  
          regarding agricultural preserve matters. 
        
         FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

         COMMENTS  :  The Williamson Act conserves agricultural and open space  
        land by allowing private property owners to sign voluntary  
        contracts with counties and cities, enforceably restricting their  
        land to agriculture, open space, and compatible uses.  In return,  
        county assessors must lower the assessed value of the contracted  
        lands to reflect their use as agriculture or open space instead of  
        the market value.  Making sure that private property owners use  
        their Williamson Act land appropriately is essential to maintaining  
        the statute's constitutional integrity.

        Approximately 16.6 million acres are under Williamson Act  
        contracts.  When the Governor's proposed 2003-04 Budget wanted to  
        save approximately $39 million by ending the state subventions, the  
        Legislative Analyst's Office recommended a 10-year phase-out.  The  
        first cuts came in 2008-09 when a budget trailer bill reduced the  
        state subventions by 10%.  The Legislature's 2009-10 Budget reduced  
        the subventions to $27.8 million.  However, the Governor  
        essentially eliminated the subventions by cutting the appropriation  
        to $1,000.

        Under a Williamson Act contract a property is valued on its  








                                                               
         AB 2530
                                                                Page  5

        "restrictions and uses."  A property in a Williamson Act contract  
        has a specific agriculture use and the value of the property is  
        based on the property's agricultural income.  The restriction is  
        the length of time of the contract.  If a landowner agrees to enter  
        into a contract that is 10% shorter than a standard Williamson Act  
        contract, under the provisions of this measure, they would forego  
        10% of their property tax relief and those monies would go back to  
        the county. 

        Support arguments:  Supporters argue that with the potential loss  
        of state funding for the Williamson Act program for the second  
        straight year, many counties can no longer afford to continue to  
        offer Williamson Act contracts to farmers and ranchers.  This  
        measure offers the opportunity to renegotiate the terms of a  
        contract in order to preserve the program and still provide  
        counties with the ability to recoup some of their lost revenues. 

        Opposition arguments:  Opposition may argue that the provisions of  
        this bill are not enough to save the Williamson Act.  Even if all  
        53 participating counties use the bill's temporary program, even if  
        Williamson Act landowners continue with their contracts, and even  
        if county assessors can quickly revalue millions of acres of  
        contracted lands, the resulting revenues will not replace the state  
        subventions.  
         
        Analysis Prepared by  :    Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 


                                                               FN: 0006870