BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2537
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 5, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 2537 (Silva) - As Amended: April 14, 2010
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 11 - 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires agencies conducting administrative hearings
using administrative law judges (ALJs) to develop regulations to
allow for a peremptory challenge of an ALJ. In addition, this
bill allows agencies to develop regulations for presiding
officers who are not ALJs.
FISCAL EFFECT
Any costs associated with this legislation would be minor and
absorbable within existing resources.
COMMENTS
Rationale . According to the author's office, "Parties in
administrative law proceedings have a substantial stake in the
outcome of that proceeding, and should have the same right to
have their matters heard by a fair and impartial trial of fact
as parties in a court proceeding." The author asserts that many
state agencies, including the largest, the Office of
Administrative Hearings (OAH) under the Department of General
Services, provide for peremptory challenges of ALJs believed to
be biased, prejudiced, or interested in the matter. However, not
all agencies allow for those challenges. This legislation would
ensure that all parties involved in administrative hearings
throughout the state would have access to peremptory challenges
should they believe an ALJ is biased or interested in the
matter.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081
AB 2537
Page 2