BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2556
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 28, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 2556 (Fuller) - As Amended:  April 15, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Revenue and  
          Taxation     Vote:                            9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill grants the Board of Equalization (BOE) discretion to  
          relieve taxpayers of interest obligations for late payments of  
          use taxes in cases where (a) BOE has obtained information  
          regarding the liability from the United States (U.S.) Customs  
          Service, and (b) the taxpayer remits the sales tax payments  
          within 90 days of being notified by the BOE.  The waiver would  
          apply to individuals or businesses with incomes of less than  
          $250,000.

          FISCAL EFFECT

          BOE estimates that, if it waived, on average, about one-half the  
          interest owed, the revenue reduction would be about $250,000  
          annually, of which about $160,000 would be GF.

           COMMENTS  :

           1)Rationale  . The bill is intended to provide tax relief to  
            individuals who purchase goods from abroad and are unaware of  
            their use tax liability until they are contacted by the BOE.  
            The author cites the experience of a constituent who claims to  
            have intended to pay the use tax due on goods he purchased  
            from a foreign merchant, but was informed by the U.S. Customs  
            that he would be sent a bill by the state.  Three years after  
            purchasing the merchandise he received notification from BOE  
            that the use tax was still owed, and was told he needed to pay  
            a penalty plus interest on the late amount. The author  
            indicates that, while the BOE was able to waive the penalty,  
            it does not have statutory authority to waive the interest.









                                                                  AB 2556
                                                                  Page  2

           2)Background  . Under existing law, retailers doing business in  
            this state are required to collect sales taxes on sales of  
            tangible personal property. Individuals and businesses that  
            purchase goods out of state for use in California are required  
            to self-report the use tax. Compliance with the use tax is  
            low, despite efforts by the BOE to inform taxpayers of their  
            obligation to pay this tax.  In an effort to increase public  
            awareness and encourage voluntary compliance in reporting the  
            use tax, California's income tax returns have, for the past  
            several years, contained a separate line for use tax  
            reporting. During 2009, AB 18 X4 was enacted to require every  
            business with at least $100,000 in gross receipts from  
            business operations to register with BOE and file an annual  
            use tax return.

            Under existing law, taxpayers failing to remit sales and use  
            taxes are subject to a penalty of 10% of taxes owed plus  
            interest (currently 7% annually) from the time the payment is  
            due until the date of payment. The BOE is authorized to waive  
            the penalty if the nonpayment was due to reasonable cause and  
            circumstances beyond the taxpayer's control. The BOE does not,  
            however, have discretion to waive interest.

           3)Background - customs information  . From July 1, 1990 through  
            June 30, 2007, the U.S. Customs Service gave BOE access to  
            customs declarations filed at various ports of entry  
            throughout California for goods purchased abroad and  
            personally hand-carried by passengers into the state.  After  
            June 30, 2007, however, the U.S. Customs Service restricted  
            access to these duty declarations, only allowing BOE access in  
            cases where BOE can first identify the name of the traveler  
            and the date of travel.

            However, for goods shipped into California, BOE has been able  
            to acquire information since July 2005 from the U.S. Customs  
            Service.  BOE matches the U.S. Customs Service's electronic  
            records of California imports against its own registration  
            records, and determines whether the California businesses and  
            individuals identified have complied with their use tax  
            reporting obligations.  BOE reports that, in fiscal year  
            2009-10, this program is expected to generate over $14  
            million.  

           4)Issue  . While it may be reasonable to allow BOE to waive  
            penalties in cases where late payments are due to reasonable  








                                                                  AB 2556
                                                                  Page  3

            cause, it is more difficult to justify the waiving of  
            interest. This is because, while penalties are a form of  
            punishment meant to discourage non-payment, interest payments  
            are primarily intended to compensate the state for the loss of  
            use of the money that it was owed at an earlier date. By  
            waiving interest, the BOE is making a taxpayer that pays two  
            or three years after the tax was due better off than his/her  
            counterpart who paid the liability on time. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081