BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2567
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 2567 (Bradford)
As Amended April 12, 2010
Majority vote
TRANSPORTATION 11-3
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Bonnie Lowenthal, Bill | | |
| |Berryhill, Blumenfield, | | |
| |Buchanan, Eng, Furutani, | | |
| |Galgiani, Hayashi, Norby, | | |
| |Portantino, Solorio | | |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Jeffries, Miller, Niello | | |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Authorizes local public agencies to use automated
parking enforcement systems for street sweeping-related
violations. Specifically, this bill :
1)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding the
importance of street sweepers in clearing streets and roads of
trash and pollutants.
2)Authorizes local agencies to install and operate automated
parking enforcement systems on local public agency-owned or
-operated street sweeping equipment for purposes of digitally
photographing street sweeping parking violations.
3)Requires the photo enforcement equipment to be angled and
focused so as to capture digital photographs of license plates
and so as not to unnecessarily capture images of drivers,
other vehicles, and pedestrians.
4)Provides that citations can only be issued for violations
captured during designated street sweeping hours.
5)Provides that citations cannot be issued to vehicles that park
in restricted zones after the street has been cleaned by the
street sweeper.
6)Allows a local public agency to contract with a private vendor
AB 2567
Page 2
for the processing of parking violation notices so long as the
local public agency maintains overall control and supervision
of the automated parking enforcement system.
7)Requires public agencies to give advanced public notice, at
least 30 days, of their intent to use automated parking
enforcement systems.
8)Restricts local agencies to issuing only warning notices
during this 30-day period using the automated enforcement
system; specifically provides, however, that local public
agencies may use a manual system to issue citations, before,
during, and after the 30-day warning period.
9)Requires a designated local public agency employee, who is
qualified to issue parking citations for that agency, to
review digital photographs to determine the validity of a
parking citation.
10)Requires that digital image evidence be retained for up to
six months from the date the information was first obtained or
60 days after final disposition of the citation, whichever
date is later, after which time the information must be
destroyed.
11)Provides that digital photographs made by an automated
parking enforcement system are confidential and use of the
photographs is limited.
12)Requires a designated employee to issue a notice of a parking
violation to the registered owner of the vehicle within 15
days of the violation and prescribes specific data to be
included in the violation.
13)Sets forth provisions governing the processing of violations
and appeals.
14)Requires a local public agency that utilizes an automatic
parking enforcement system to report specific information to
the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees and the Assembly
Transportation Committee by January 1, 2015.
15)Sunsets on January 1, 2016.
AB 2567
Page 3
EXISTING LAW authorizes the:
16)City and County of San Francisco, until January 1, 2012, to
issue citations based on photo-evidence of parking violations
in transit-only lanes.
17)Use of automated enforcement systems at rail or rail transit
signals and crossing gates.
18)Use of automated enforcement systems at intersections to
detect red light violations.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS : According to the author, the intent of this bill is
"to reduce the amount of dirt, oil, and debris being washed into
the storm drains, thereby having a positive environmental
impact."
The California Public Parking Association, sponsor of this bill,
suggests that by allowing automated parking enforcement systems
to be placed on street sweepers, this bill will effectively
complement the work of existing parking enforcement personnel
and help allocate scarce resources.
Currently, Chicago and the District of Columbia (Washington
D.C.) use the automated street sweeper system, which uses
photo-light sensing, character recognition, and global
positioning system technology to spot parking violators.
In California, use of similar automated enforcement technology
is authorized for red light violations by a governmental agency.
Last session, usage of this technology was also authorized on a
pilot project basis for the City and County of San Francisco
(San Francisco) to issue citations based on photo-evidence of
transit-only-lane parking violations. The authority granted to
San Francisco was provided for in AB 101 (Ma), Chapter 377,
Statutes of 2008.
Provisions of this bill are similar to those in AB 101 and
identical to last year's AB 1336 (Eng) that passed the
Legislature but was vetoed by the Governor. In his veto
message, the Governor wrote, "This bill could present a
significant risk of violating an individual's privacy unrelated
AB 2567
Page 4
to the enforcement of law. It may also lead to the unwarranted
proliferation of camera enforcement in many other arenas."
Interestingly, subsequent to the Governor's veto of AB 1336 for
these reasons, the Governor introduced his budget proposal which
calls for the deployment of a massive statewide speed camera
program to generate nearly $400 million in net profit to state
and local government. As proposed, the camera program is
expected to print over two million citations each year.
Previous legislation: Last year's AB 1336 (Eng) was identical
to this bill.
AB 101 (Ma), Chapter 377, Statutes of 2008, authorized the City
and County of San Francisco to issue citations based on
photo-evidence of transit-only-lane parking violations.
SB 1136 (Kopp), Chapter 54, Statutes of 1998, extended
indefinitely provisions that allow the use of automated
enforcement systems at official traffic control signals.
SB 833 (Kopp), Chapter 922, Statutes of 1995, originally
authorized, for a limited time, the use of automated photo
enforcement for all places where a driver is required to respond
to an official traffic control signal (i.e. red light cameras).
Analysis Prepared by : Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093
FN: 0003855