BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2605
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 12, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                 AB 2605 (De La Torre) - As Amended:  April 27, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Revenue and  
          Taxation     Vote:                            6-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Franchise Tax Board to establish a reward  
          program for information resulting in the identification of  
          underreported tax liabilities under the personal income tax or  
          corporate tax.  Specifically, the bill:

          1)In cases where the information is brought to the attention of  
            the FTB by the informant, that individual may receive a reward  
            of 25% of collected proceeds from a subsequent administrative  
            action, hearing or settlement, up to $250,000. 

          2)In cases arising from an FTB administrative hearing, audit,  
            investigation, news media account, or hearing, the a person  
            providing relevant information may receive an award equal to  
            10% of resulting collections.  In this case, the FTB  
            determines the reward based on the importance of the person's  
            information and the role of the person contributing to the  
            administrative hearing, judicial hearing, or settlement.

          3)Limits the rewards program as it pertains to under reported  
            personal income taxes to cases where the amount in dispute in  
            the administrative or judicial action exceeds $2 million, and  
            when the underpayment is attributable to an individual with  
            gross income of more than $250,000.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT
           
          Based on current FTB estimates, the reward program would lose  
          money during the next three years, and in subsequent years would  
          barely break even. Normally, the Legislature requires a 5:1  
          benefit-cost ratio to justify funding for new or expanded  








                                                                  AB 2605
                                                                  Page  2

          collections programs at FTB. Specifically:

          1)FTB staff estimates on-going costs of approximately $420,000  
            for five positions to track informant tips, audit new cases,  
            manually track collection cases, and monitor disbursements  
            from collected proceeds.

          2)FTB staff estimates the program would yield additional  
            collections totaling $200,000 in 2010-11, $350,000 in 2011-12,  
            and $400,000 in 2012-13. 

           COMMENTS
          1)Purpose .  According to the author's office, the purpose of  
            this bill is to offer a monetary reward to motivate citizens  
            to bring alleged violations of tax laws to the attention of  
            the FTB.

           2)Background  . The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) can, at its  
            discretion, pay rewards to informers for information about tax  
            law violations. The amount of the reward generally does not  
            exceed 15 percent of the additional taxes, penalties, and  
            fines collected as a result of the informant's information.  
            States generally do not maintain rewards programs. Though  
            California state tax law has authorized the FTB to conduct an  
            informant reward program since 1984, no money has been  
            appropriated to pay informants and the program has never been  
            operational. Similarly, a review of other large states by FTB  
            found that none has such a program.
           
          3)Fiscal concern  . A key reason for the lack of state interest in  
            rewards program is that an informant is likely to go to the  
            IRS rather than state collection agencies, given the larger  
            amount of federal taxes involved and potentially greater  
            rewards available. Based on FTB's current estimates, the money  
            needed to operate this program could be more effectively spent  
            on other collections programs.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081