BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 14, 2010

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                                Cameron Smyth, Chair
            AB 2663 (Bonnie Lowenthal) - As Introduced:  February 19, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :  Local government: federal fiscal year.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the state to delay borrowing from those  
          cities and counties that operate on the federal fiscal year.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Defines "federal fiscal year" to mean a fiscal year beginning  
            on October 1 and ending September 30.

          2)Defines "federal fiscal year city, county, or city and county"  
            to mean any city, county, or city and county that observes the  
            federal fiscal year calendar.

          3)Provides that if the Legislature transfers, borrows, or  
            suspends revenues allocated to a federal fiscal year city,  
            county, or city and county, that the transaction shall be  
            suspended during the months of July, August, and September,  
            and instead, commence on October 1.

          4)Provides that the suspended transaction for federal fiscal  
            year cities and counties shall apply to all of the following  
            transactions enacted by law on or after January 1, 2011,  
            involving the following funds and revenues:

             a)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of property tax  
               revenues, allocated in accordance with subdivision (a) of  
               Section 1 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution;

             b)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of revenues from  
               the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) required to be  
               apportioned pursuant to Section 3 of Article XIX of the  
               California Constitution;

             c)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of revenues from  
               the Transportation Investment Fund (TIF) allocated pursuant  
               to subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article XIX B of the  
               California Constitution (Proposition 42 funds); and,

             d)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of funds  








                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  2

               allocated to a redevelopment agency pursuant to subdivision  
               (b) of Section 16 of Article XVI of the California  
               Constitution.

          5)Makes other findings and declarations about the impact of  
            borrowing local revenues on those cities and counties that  
            observe the federal fiscal year.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides that the Legislature can borrow a specified amount of  
            total property tax revenues from local governments if:

             a)   The Governor issues a proclamation of  "severe fiscal  
               hardship;"
             b)   The Legislature enacts an urgency statute suspending  
               Proposition 1A property tax protection with a two-thirds  
               vote of each house; and,

             c)   The Legislature enacts a law providing for full  
               repayment of the borrowed funds plus interest within three  
               years.

          2)Redirects $1.7 billion of redevelopment property tax increment  
            revenues to K-12 school districts serving redevelopment areas  
            in 2009-10 and an additional $350 million in 2010-11 and  
            shifts an equivalent amount of existing property tax revenue  
            from those school districts to the Supplemental Revenue  
            Augmentation Fund.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)According to the author, there are five local governments in  
            California that operate on a federal fiscal year including the  
            cities of Long Beach, Huntington Beach, Inglewood, 
          El Segundo and South Lake Tahoe.  

          2)The federal fiscal year commences on October 1st, three months  
            after the beginning of the state's fiscal year.  In previous  
            years, if the state intended to borrow money from local  
            governments, it usually did so at the start of the state's  
            fiscal year on July 1st.  The author notes that "for the five  
            cities on the federal fiscal year, the state's borrowing comes  








                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  3

            at the end of their budget cycles - when they are least able  
            to adapt to borrowing, placing an undue financial burden on  
            those cities."  For those local governments that follow the  
            state's fiscal year, borrowing would typically occur at the  
            beginning of their calendar year, and those local governments  
            would be better able to plan for the borrowing, transfer, or  
            suspension in an up-front manner.

          3)AB 2663 provides for a delay in state borrowing, transfer, or  
            suspension of revenues for the affected five cities, meaning  
            that state borrowing would start on October 1 and any  
            transactions for July, August, and September for those five  
            cities would be suspended.  The bill provides the revenue  
            streams that this delay would apply to - property tax  
            revenues, HUTA funds, Proposition 42 transportation funds, and  
            redevelopment funds.

          4)One of the revenue streams mentioned in the bill is from the  
            Transportation Investment Fund allocated pursuant to  
            subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article XIX B of the  
            California Constitution.  Staff notes that the Legislature  
            passed, and the Governor signed AB X8 6 and AB X8 9 in March  
            of 2010.  Both bills were part of a package of bills that  
            enacted a gas tax swap affecting transportation funds.  The  
            author may want to ensure that with the recent changes to  
            transportation funding, that the cross-reference to  
            transportation funds contained in the bill is correct.

           5)Support Arguments  . The five cities that observe the federal  
            calendar year face a bigger financial burden than other cities  
            when state borrowing, transfer, or suspension of revenues  
            occurs.  A delay that would coincide with the start of the  
            federal fiscal year makes sense from an administrative  
            standpoint for the five cities, and allows those local  
            governments to retain the ability to budget as necessary to  
            better absorb any borrowing, suspension, or transfer that  
            might occur.
           6)Opposition Arguments  .  This bill may create some minor  
            administrative work for the state in order to track such  
            delays through various processes.  Also, there may be very  
            minimal impacts to the state's cash flow due to the provisions  
            allowing for the delay, in which portions of the borrowed  
            revenues might be realized in the year following the fiscal  
            year from when it is actually borrowed or suspended.









                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  4

            As we've seen in recent years, there could be instances of  
            mid-year budget adjustments.  This bill assumes that any  
            borrowing, suspension, or transfer would commence at the start  
            of the state's fiscal year in July, but this is not  
            necessarily the case in all situations.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          City of Long Beach [SPONSOR]
          City of Huntington Beach

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958