BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2663 (Bonnie Lowenthal)
          As Amended  August 17, 2010
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |73-1 |(June 2, 2010)  |SENATE: |32-1 |(August 19,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2010)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   L. GOV.  

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the state to delay the borrowing, transfer,  
          or suspension of Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) revenues until  
          the start of the federal fiscal year for those cities that  
          operate on the federal fiscal year.

           The Senate amendments  :  

          1)Limit the provisions of the bill to cities that follow a  
            federal fiscal year by deleting references to counties.

          2)Limit the provisions of the bill to the borrowing, transfer,  
            or suspension of revenues of HUTA revenues from federal fiscal  
            year cities.

          3)Make other technical, clarifying changes.

           EXISTING LAW  provides that the Legislature can borrow a  
          specified amount of total property tax revenues from local  
          governments if:

          1)The Governor issues a proclamation of "severe fiscal  
            hardship;"

          2)The Legislature enacts an urgency statute suspending  
            Proposition 1A property tax protection with a two-thirds vote  
            of each house; and,

          3)The Legislature enacts a law providing for full repayment of  
            the borrowed funds plus interest within three years.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill:

          1)Defined "federal fiscal year" to mean a fiscal year beginning  








                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  2

            on October 1 and ending September 30.

          2)Defined "federal fiscal year city, county, or city and county"  
            to mean any city, county, or city and county that observes the  
            federal fiscal year calendar.

          3)Defined "state fiscal year" to mean a fiscal year beginning on  
            July 1 and ending June 30.

          4)Provided that if the Legislature transfers, borrows, or  
            suspends revenues allocated to a federal fiscal year city,  
            county, or city and county, that the transaction shall be  
            suspended during the months of July, August, and September,  
            and instead, commence on October 1 and specifies that the  
            transaction shall be completed on or before June 30 of that  
            same state fiscal year.
          5)Provided that the suspended transaction for federal fiscal  
            year cities and counties shall apply to all of the following  
            transactions enacted by law on or after January 1, 2011,  
            involving the following funds and revenues:

             a)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of property tax  
               revenues, allocated in accordance with subdivision (a) of  
               Section 1 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution;

             b)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of revenues from  
               HUTA required to be apportioned to cities and counties  
               pursuant to Chapter 3 of Division 3 of the Streets and  
               Highways Code [including the revenues apportioned pursuant  
               to Section 2103 of the Streets and Highways Code, as  
               amended by AB 9 X8 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 12,  
               Statutes of 2010];

             c)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of revenues from  
               the Transportation Investment Fund (TIF) allocated pursuant  
               to subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article XIX B of the  
               California Constitution (Proposition 42 funds); and,

             d)   The borrowing, transfer, or suspension of funds  
               allocated to a redevelopment agency pursuant to subdivision  
               (b) of Section 16 of Article XVI of the California  
               Constitution.

          6)Made other findings and declarations about the impact of  
            borrowing local revenues on those cities and counties that  








                                                                 AB 2663
                                                                  Page  3

            observe the federal fiscal year.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, potential General Fund revenue loss of up to $200,000  
          due to loss of interest, and a potential cash flow impact due to  
          a delay of cash receipts.  Senate Appropriations notes that the  
          magnitude of the fiscal impact would depend on the amount and  
          timing of any state transfer, borrowing, or suspension of local  
          revenues.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, there are five local  
          governments in California that operate on a federal fiscal year  
          including the cities of Long Beach, Huntington Beach, Inglewood,  
          El Segundo and South Lake Tahoe.  

          The federal fiscal year commences on October 1st, three months  
          after the beginning of the state's fiscal year.  In previous  
          years, if the state intended to borrow money from local  
          governments, it usually did so at the start of the state's  
          fiscal year on July 1st.  The author notes that "for the five  
          cities on the federal fiscal year, the state's borrowing comes  
          at the end of their budget cycles - when they are least able to  
          adapt to borrowing, placing an undue financial burden on those  
          cities."  For those local governments that follow the state's  
          fiscal year, borrowing would typically occur at the beginning of  
          their calendar year, and those local governments would be better  
          able to plan for the borrowing, transfer, or suspension in an  
          up-front manner.

          This bill provides for a delay in state borrowing, transfer, or  
          suspension of revenues for the affected five cities, meaning  
          that state borrowing would start on October 1 and any  
          transactions for July, August, and September for those five  
          cities would be suspended.  Amendments taken in the Senate  
          specify that the delay in borrowing only applies to HUTA funds.   
          The bill provides that any transferring, borrowing, or  
          suspension of HUTA revenues that commences on October 1 for the  
          federal fiscal year cities shall be completed on or before June  
          30 of that same state fiscal year.
          Support arguments:  The five cities that observe the federal  
          calendar year face a bigger financial burden than other cities  
          when state borrowing, transfer, or suspension of revenues  
          occurs.  A delay that would coincide with the start of the  
          federal fiscal year makes sense from an administrative  
          standpoint for the five cities, and allows those local  








                                                                  AB 2663
                                                                  Page  4

          governments to retain the ability to budget as necessary to  
          better absorb any borrowing, suspension, or transfer of HUTA  
          funds that might occur.

          Opposition arguments:  This bill may create some minor  
          administrative work for the state in order to track such delays  
          through various processes.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958


                                                              FN: 0006143