BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2667
                                                                  Page  1

          DCONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2667 (Hill)
          As Amended  August 18, 2010
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |65-6 |(May 20, 2010)  |SENATE: |28-3 |(August 20,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2010)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   TRANS.   

           SUMMARY  :  Requires medical facilities to provide contact  
          information to parents or other responsible parties on the  
          no-cost or low-cost assistance that is available for the  
          inspection and installation of child passenger restraint  
          systems.  

           The Senate amendments  :  

          1)Specify that facilities providing this information would not  
            have any additional obligations relating to child restraint  
            systems.  

          2)Delete this bill's provision that would have limited a  
            facility's obligation to provide this information to one  
            instance per child.  

          3)Add the Department of Public Health's Web site containing the  
            child passenger restraint system safety inspection locator to  
            those contacts that might be provided by medical facilities to  
            parents of discharged children.  
           
          EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Requires every public or private hospital, clinic, or birthing  
            center, at the time of the discharge of a child less than six  
            years of age or less than 60 pounds, to provide and discuss  
            information on the current law requiring child passenger  
            restraint systems to the parents or the person to whom the  
            child is released.  

          2)Provides that these facilities will not be responsible for the  
            failure of the parent or person to whom the child is released  
            to use a child passenger restraint system.  








                                                                  AB 2667
                                                                  Page  2


          3)Prohibits a parent or legal guardian, while present in a motor  
            vehicle, from permitting his/her child less than six years of  
            age or under 60 pounds to be transported upon a highway  
            without providing and properly securing a child passenger car  
            seat in the rear seat of the vehicle that meets federal safety  
            standards.  

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill:

          1)Made findings and declarations regarding the safety benefits  
            of properly using child restraint systems in motor vehicles  
            and the high rate of improper installation of those systems.  

          2)Required public and private hospitals, clinics, and birthing  
            centers, at the time of the discharge of a child under six  
            years of age or under 60 pounds, to provide and discuss with  
            the parent or person to whom the child is released information  
            on where child passenger restraint systems can be inspected  
            and proper installation instruction can be given, by providing  
            appropriate contact information.  

          3)Specified that such contact information may include, but is  
            not limited to, calling 1-866-SEAT-CHECK, visiting  
            www.seatcheck.org, and providing the telephone number of the  
            local office of the California Highway Patrol and the Web site  
            for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Child  
            Safety Seat Inspection Station Locator.  

          4)Provided that the specified facilities are responsible for  
            providing that information only one time per child.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, there will be minor costs to hospitals, clinics and  
          other medical facilities (including the University of California  
          and other public facilities) to provide additional information.   


           COMMENTS  :  The author reports that he has hosted two child seat  
          safety check events in his district over the last six months and  
          saw first-hand the alarming number of child safety seats that  
          are not installed properly.  He is therefore seeking to ensure  
          that parents know that existing resources are available to  
          obtain free safety seat inspections.  He points to a recent  
          study indicating that over 90% of parents and caregivers believe  








                                                                  AB 2667
                                                                  Page  3

          their child safety seats are installed correctly, whereas  
          research shows that seven out of 10 children are improperly  
          restrained, putting them at risk for serious injury or death in  
          a crash.  

          Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death of  
          children, three to 14 years of age.  Many of these deaths can be  
          prevented through the proper use of child safety seats.   
          According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,  
          child safety seats can reduce fatal injury by 7l% for infants  
          and by 54% for toddlers, one to four years of age.  

          The author notes that in vetoing two previous bills AB 2108  
          (Evans) of 2006, and AB 881 (Mullin) of 2007, that would have  
          established new child restraint requirements, the Governor  
          suggested that safety benefits would instead accrue from more  
          education and enforcement of existing requirements.  This bill  
          seeks to take precisely that approach.  

          While some might suggest that this bill would establish an  
          onerous mandate for medical establishments that are currently  
          under great stress to provide all the services expected of them,  
          it should be noted that these facilities are already required to  
          discuss child restraint issues with the parents of the young  
          children they treat.  The requirements of this bill would seem  
          to represent more of a refinement of the existing mandate,  
          rather than the establishment of a new one.  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Howard Posner / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 


                                                                FN: 0006330