BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2735
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 19, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                AB 2735 (De Leon) - As Introduced:  February 19, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Revenue and  
          Taxation     Vote:                            6-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable: No           

          SUMMARY

          This bill provides that a "change-of-ownership" reassessment of  
          property is not triggered when one co-owner of a principal  
          residence dies and his or her interest in the property is  
          transferred to the other owner. Specifically, the bill:

          1)Requires that, in order to avoid a change-of-ownership  
            reassessment, the two individuals must together own 100% of  
            the real property in a joint tenancy or as tenants in common.

          2)Requires that, in order to be eligible for the exclusion, the  
            transferee must sign, under penalty of perjury, an affidavit  
            affirming that he or she continuously resided with the  
            transferor at the residence for the one-year period  
            immediately preceding the transfer.

          3)Applies to transfers occurring between January 1, 2011 and  
            January 1, 2021, and provides that the state will not  
            reimburse any local agency for any losses in property tax  
            revenues due to this bill.

           FISCAL EFFECT
           
          1)The Board of Equalization (BOE) estimates that this bill will  
            result in annual property tax reductions ranging from $175,000  
            to $525,000 in 2011-12, $350,000 to $1.050 million in 2011-12,  
            and increasing amounts in subsequent years.

          2)Under Proposition 98, reductions in property taxes to K-12 and  
            community college districts would be offset by the GF. This  
            would translate into increased annual GF costs of between  








                                                                  AB 2735
                                                                  Page  2

            $65,000 and $200,000 in 2011-12, $130,000 to $400,000 in  
            2012-13, and increasing amounts subsequent years.

           COMMENTS  
           
           1)Background  . Under existing property tax law, real property is  
            reassessed to its current fair market value whenever there is  
            a "change in ownership." The assessed valuation growth is then  
            limited to no more than 2% per year until another change in  
            ownership occurs. Generally, a when a death of an individual  
            results in the transfer of interest in property to a co-owner,  
            the portion of ownership that that is transferred is  
            reassessed to market value. However, there are many exclusions  
            from the change-in-ownership reassessment. Exclusions are  
            currently provided for transfers between spouses, registered  
            domestic partners, parents and children, and persons that own  
            property in a joint tenancy form of ownership where the  
            surviving joint tenant has original transferor status.

            However, under existing law, there is no exclusion for  
            transfers of real property between two unrelated persons who  
            own the home as tenants in common. Individuals in this  
            situation may include: seniors, veterans, or others who own a  
            home together and choose not to marry because of the loss of  
            various benefits; siblings or other members of a family;  
            friends or companions that choose not marry or register as  
            domestic partners; family members such as siblings; a person  
            and his or her care provider; or any two people who live  
            together to share the cost of housing.

           2)Purpose  . The intent of the bill is to protect a surviving  
            co-owner from an upward adjustment in the home's assessment,  
            thereby allowing the survivor to continue paying the same  
            amount of property tax on the home after the other person's  
            death.  
           
          3)Related legislation  . This bill is identical to AB 103 (De  
            Leon) from last year, and SB 153 (Migden) from 2008. AB 103  
            was held under submission by this Committee and SB 153 was  
            vetoed by the governor. 

          Analysis Prepared by:    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081