BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                              1
          1







                SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
                                 ALEX PADILLA, CHAIR
          

          AB 2758 -  Bradford                          Hearing Date:  June  
          29, 2010              A
          As Amended:         June 1, 2010                  FISCAL       B

                                                                        2
                                                                        7
                                                                        5
                                                                        8

                                      DESCRIPTION
           
           Current law  requires the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (CPUC) to require each electrical, gas, water, and telephone  
          corporation with gross annual revenues exceeding $25 million to  
          submit annually a detailed and verifiable plan for increasing  
          women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprise  
          (WMDVBE) procurement in all categories and short- and long-term  
          goals and timetables for that procurement.

           This bill  specifies that these procurement categories include  
          renewable energy, wireless telecommunications, broadband, smart  
          grid, and rail projects.

           Current law  requires each electrical, gas, water, and telephone  
          corporation with gross annual revenues exceeding $25 million to  
          submit an annual report to the CPUC regarding implementation of  
          its WMDVBE program.

          This bill  requires these corporations to also provide  
          information to the CPUC about which procurements are made with  
          WMDVBEs that have at least a majority of their workforce in  
          California.

           Current law  requires the CPUC to annually report to the  
          Legislature on the progress of utilities in implementing their  
          WMDVBE programs.

           This bill  requires that this CPUC report to the Legislature  
          include information about which procurements are made with  












          WMDVBEs that have at least a majority of their workforce in  
          California.

           Current law  specifies measures that a utility may consider to  
          increase its WMDVBE procurement, including amendment of  
          performance bond requirements when past performance within a  
          specified area of business justifies that consideration.

           This bill  would specify that a utility may consider an amendment  
          to performance bond requirements so that they do not  
          prohibitively burden WMDVBEs from procuring utility contracts.

           This bill  makes legislative findings about the economic benefits  
          of regulated utilities contracting with women, minority, and  
          disabled veteran businesses, especially in connection with  
          renewable energy, wireless telecommunications, broadband, smart  
          grid, and rail projects.


                                      BACKGROUND

           Beginning in 1986, the Legislature enacted a series of statutes,  
          and the CPUC adopted General Order (GO) 156, to encourage the  
          award of a fair proportion of all utility contracts for products  
          and services to WMDVBEs.   Commission-regulated water utilities  
          originally were not required to participate in the program but  
          were added in 2009.  These entities are required to annually  
          submit a detailed and verifiable plan, with goals and  
          timetables, for increasing WMDVBE procurement in all categories  
          of procurement, including technology, equipment, supplies,  
          services, materials, and construction.  A separate annual report  
          on progress made in meeting those goals also is required. There  
          is no penalty for failure of a utility to meet its goals.  The  
          CPUC is required to make an annual report to the Legislature on  
          utility progress in meeting WMDVBE goals.

          GO 156 specifies guidelines for the utilities to follow in  
          meeting WMDVBE requirements, including the following procurement  
          goals:  5% of all procurement from woman-owned business  
          enterprises; 15% from minority-owned business enterprises, and  
          1.5% for disabled veteran-owned businesses enterprises.  The  
          CPUC is required to adopt criteria for determining which  
          enterprises count toward these goals.  GO 156 requires woman-  











          and minority-owned business enterprises to be certified by the  
          CPUC's Utility Diversity Supplier Program clearinghouse, and  
          disabled veteran-owned businesses enterprises to be certified by  
          the Department of General Services pursuant to DVBE  
          certification established under the California Disabled Veteran  
          Business Enterprise Program.  Utilities subject to the WMDVBE  
          requirements are assessed a charge based on intrastate revenues  
          to support operation of the clearinghouse.

          The CPUC currently has an open rulemaking to review the impact  
          of GO 156 and its success in encouraging regulated utilities to  
          seek the full and fair participation of WMDVBEs in their  
          procurement programs (R.09-07-027).

          The California Constitution prohibits the State from  
          discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to,  
          any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color,  
          ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public  
          employment, public education, or public contracting.  According  
          to the CPUC, nothing in GO 156 authorizes or permits a utility  
          to use set-asides, preferences, or quotas in administration of  
          its WMDVBE program and utilities retain the authority to use  
          legitimate business judgment to select a supplier for a  
          particular contract.


                                       COMMENTS

          1)Author's Purpose  .  According to the author, emerging  
            industries that are vital to economic recovery have  
            historically left minority- and women-owned businesses behind.  
             This bill identifies renewable energy, wireless  
            telecommunications, broadband, smart grid, and rail projects  
            as emerging technologies that utilities should focus on in  
            their WMDVBE procurement programs.  The bill requires  
            utilities to include these sectors in their annual plans and  
            goals for WMDVBE procurement that are submitted to the CPUC.   
            The author claims that this will improve inclusion of WMDVBEs  
            in emerging technology sectors and demonstrate the  
            contributions of WMDVBEs to these sectors.  

           2)Level Playing Field  .  While the goal of the WMDVBE program is  
            to increase diversity in utility procurement, the program  











            requirements translate into reporting obligations for utility  
            corporations.  The original purpose of this bill was to extend  
            WMDVBE requirements to cable television corporations, thereby  
            making them subject to the same requirements as telephone  
            corporations with which they compete for customers.  That  
            provision was removed from the bill after strong opposition  
            from the cable industry.  Thus, the bill in its current form  
            does not extend the WMDVBE requirements to a broader range of  
            service providers, but instead increases the scope of WMDVBE  
            requirements on those to whom they already apply.  The end  
            result is increased requirements for telephone corporations  
            that compete with cable providers for customers.
           
          3)Rail Projects as Emerging Sector  .  The bill includes "rail  
            projects" on the list of emerging technology sectors that  
            should be included in utilities' WMDVBE annual plans and  
            goals.   According to the CPUC, it is not a common practice  
            for electrical, gas, water, and telephone corporations - the  
            utilities subject to WMDVBE requirements - to procure services  
            for "rail projects."  While railroad corporations are  
            utilities, the CPUC's jurisdiction over them is limited to  
            rail safety.  The author may wish to consider amending the  
            bill to more clearly identify the type of emerging technology  
            "rail projects" referenced, to add railroad corporations to  
            the list of utilities subject to WMDVBE requirements, or to  
            delete "rail projects" from the bill.

           4)California Workforce Data  .  This bill requires each utility to  
            include in its annual report on WMDVBE implementation, and the  
            CPUC to include in its annual report to the Legislature,  
            information about which WMDVBE contractors have at least a  
            majority of their workforce in California.  The author states  
            that this requirement may further the goal of keeping jobs in  
            California.  

           5)Performance Bonds  .  The bill provides that among the measures  
            a utility may consider to increase WMDVBE procurement is  
            amendment of performance bond requirements so that they do not  
            prohibitively burden WMDVBEs from procuring utility contracts.  
             The author states that this change makes it more explicit  
            that a utility could impose less restrictive performance bonds  
            for WMDVBE contractors and thereby improve procurement with  
            WMDVBEs.












           6)DVBE Certification  .  Current law requires the CPUC to adopt  
            criteria for determining which businesses qualify to count  
            toward a utility's WMDVBE procurement goals.  GO 156 requires  
            woman- and minority-owned business enterprises to be certified  
            by the CPUC's Utility Diversity Supplier Program, and disabled  
            veteran-owned businesses enterprises to be certified by the  
            Department of General Services (DGS) pursuant to DVBE  
            certification established under the California Disabled  
            Veteran Business Enterprise Program.  The Elite SDVOB Network  
            Northern California Chapter recommends that use of DGS  
            certification of DVBEs be required in statute, claiming this  
            will create more certainty and predictability for DVBE  
            certification.  The CPUC supports this change in law.  AB 1918  
            (Davis), which also makes changes to the WMDVBE program, has  
            been amended to require DGS certification of DVBEs.  The  
            author may wish to consider amending this bill to require that  
            DVBEs be certified by DGS for utility procurement and to avoid  
            any conflict with AB 1918.

           7)Related Legislation  .  AB 1918 (Davis) requires each "wireless  
            communications service provider" with gross annual revenues  
            exceeding $25 million to meet the WMDVBE requirements and  
            requires that DVBEs be certified by DGS for utility  
            procurement.
           

                                   ASSEMBLY VOTES

           Assembly Utilities & Commerce         9-2
          Assembly Appropriations              12-5
          Assembly Floor                     53-21


                                       POSITIONS
           
           Sponsor:
           
          The Greenlining Institute.

           Support:
           
          Greenlining Institute (sponsor)











          American GI Forum of California
          Asian Business Association
          Black Business Association 
          Black Economic Council (BEC)
          California Black Chamber of Commerce
          California Journal for Filipino Americans
          California Public Utilities Commission
          CHARO Community Development Corporation
          Community Union Inc
          Economic Business Development, Inc. (EBD)
          Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Alameda County
          Inland Empire Latino Coalition 
          Korean Center, Inc
          Latino Business Chamber of Greater Los Angeles
          Mabuhay Alliance
          National Association of Filipino American Associations
          Orange County Black Chamber of Commerce
          OurWeekly 
          TELACU

           Oppose:
           
          None on file.

          Jackie Kinney 
          AB 2758  Analysis
          Hearing Date:  June 29, 2010