BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
2774 (Swanson)
Hearing Date: 8/12/2010 Amended: 8/10/2010
Consultant: Bob Franzoia Policy Vote: L&IR 4-1
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: AB 2774 would establish a rebuttable presumption
as to when an employer commits a serious violation and would
define physical harm, as specified. This bill would also
establish new procedures and standards for the investigation and
the determination by the Division of Occupational Safety and
Health (division) in the Department of Industrial Relations of a
serious violation by an employer which causes harm or exposes an
employee to the risk of harm.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund
Revision of procedures to $300 to $600 annually; likely
an overall Special*
determine degree of reduction in current appeals process
workplace injuries costs in future years
* Occupational Safety and Health Fund
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
Existing law authorizes the division to issue a citation when an
employer causes an employee to suffer or potentially suffer,
among other things, serious injury or illness or serious
physical harm.
This bill defines serious physical harm to mean any injury or
illness, specific or cumulative, occurring in the place of
employment or in connection with any employment, that results in
any of the following:
(1) Inpatient hospitalization for purposes other than medical
observation.
(2) The loss of any member of the body.
(3) Any serious degree of permanent disfigurement.
This bill would revise the current process to provide for a
staged process that would result in a review of the alleged
violation before that violation reaches the appeals process.
There would be initial costs to provide the "pre appeal"
process. To the extent alleged violations are disposed of
earlier, there would be savings overall.