BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2785
                                                                  Page  1

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2785 (Veterans Affairs Committee) 
          As Amended  May 12, 2010
          Majority vote 

           VETERANS AFFAIRS    9-0         APPROPRIATIONS      15-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Cook, Salas, Block,       |Ayes:|Fuentes, Conway, Ammiano, |
          |     |Gilmore, Knight, Lieu,    |     |Coto, Davis, Hall,        |
          |     |Saldana, V. Manuel Perez, |     |Harkey, Hill, Lowenthal,  |
          |     |Yamada                    |     |Miller, Nielsen, Norby,   |
          |     |                          |     |Skinner, Solorio,         |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson                 |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs  
          (Secretary), on or before June 30, 2011, and every year  
          thereafter, to identify other state agencies and departments  
          that offer or provide services to veterans, for the purpose of  
          entering into formal agreements that specify the respective  
          roles and activities of the entities. 

           EXISTING LAW  states the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) has  
          specified powers and duties relating to military veterans, and  
          the Secretary is in charge of DVA.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  General Fund costs of around $100,000 annually  
          for up to two years for the equivalent of one full-time position  
          in DVA to identify and enter into agreements with other state  
          agencies providing veterans agencies.  Costs to the other  
          agencies should be absorbable.

           COMMENTS:   According to the findings of the bill, a 2009 audit  
          of DVA by the State Auditor confirmed that DVA provides few  
          direct services to veterans, outside of its veteran homes and  
          Cal Vet Home Loan Program, and that DVA has extremely limited  
          interaction and few formal agreements with other state agencies  
          and other departments that could provide additional services to  
          veterans if done in a coordinated and efficient manner.

          The author states that this dysfunction unfortunately comes at a  
          critical time, with California on the verge of experiencing the  
          return of thousands of soldiers from Operation Iraqi Freedom and  








                                                                  AB 2785
                                                                  Page  2

          Operation Enduring Freedom.  Many will have served multiple  
          tours of duty in combat zones and thus will likely suffer from  
          both physical and mental health issues. 


          The 2009 audit additionally noted that the strategic plan of DVA  
          covering fiscal years 2007 to 2012, inclusive, is incomplete and  
          has not formally assessed the needs of veterans or included key  
          stakeholders in its strategic planning process, nor has it  
          effectively measured the department's progress towards meeting  
          the goals and objectives identified in the plan.

           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Eric Worthen / V. A. / (916) 319-3550 


                                                                FN: 0004344