BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           44 (Corbett)
          
          Hearing Date:  07/23/2009           Amended: 07/08/2009
          Consultant:  Dan Troy           Policy Vote: ED 7-0
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:   SCR 44 would request the California Department  
          of Education (CDE) to review the regional market rate  
          methodology and implementation guidelines that set reimbursement  
          rates for certain child care providers and require the CDE,  
          should it complete this review, to submit a report to the  
          Legislature before the next budget cycle about the review and  
          any recommended changes to the methodology.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2009-10      2010-11       2011-12     Fund
                                                                  
          Regional Market Rate              $200 to $250             
          General
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.
          
          Under current law, many subsidized child care slots are provided  
          through vouchers or alternative payment programs (APPs) that are  
          generally funded at a Regional Market Rate (RMR) determined  
          through a biennial survey.  Depending on the level of care,  
          providers are funded at a certain percentage of the cost of  
          private care in that region.  Licensed providers (Title 22 and  
          family child care homes) typically are funded at 85 percent of  
          the RMR.  The methodology used in the most recent RMR survey  
          involved sampling and estimation that was based first on  
          statistical socio-economic modeling of zip codes into "market  
          profiles."  Licensed providers were then sampled based on the  
          zip code of their physical location.  Reimbursement ceilings  
          were then calculated at the market profile level for care  
          setting, age of the child, and time category (hourly, daily,  
          weekly, monthly).  County and sub-county estimates become the  
          weighted averages of the market profiles within their  










          jurisdictions.  

          Other providers that contract directly with the Department of  
          Education are reimbursed through a uniform Standard  
          Reimbursement Rate (SRR) that was established in 1980 and has  
          been increased over time through cost of living adjustments.   
          The differential between the RMR and SRR rates can create  
          disparities in funding in high-cost counties.  Certain providers  
          are subject to the higher standards, yet the uniform SRR at  
          which they are funded can be lower than what license-exempt  
          providers may receive through the RMR in the same county.  

          Many child care providers who are reimbursed using the RMR also  
          believe that the current survey methodology relies too heavily  
          on median home values and incomes, which may not necessarily  
          have any effect on private child care rates charged in that  
          area.


          Page 2
          SCR 44 (Corbett)

          In order to achieve nearly $40 million in budget savings, the  
          Governor proposed a reduction in the reimbursement rate ceiling,  
          from the 85th percentile of the 2005 Regional Market Rates to  
          the 75th percentile of the 2007 Regional Market Rate. This  
          proposal was rejected by the Budget Conference Committee.

          This resolution would request CDE to review the current RMR  
          methodology and implementation guidelines, and question whether  
          adherence to the current regional market rate system has  
          resulted in sufficient access for working poor families.  
          Further, the resolution would also request CDE to operate an  
          open and transparent process where all vested stakeholders are  
          fully versed in the methodology used for the regional market  
          rate survey and are included in the planning and implementation  
          process being undertaken by the CDE to establish new rates or a  
          new rate structure.  CDE would also be requested to submit a  
          report to the Legislature by April of 2010 relating to the  
          review of the methodology and recommend changes.

          The process requested in the resolution would likely result in  
          costs of $200,000 to $250,000, as the CDE would need to shift  
          two positions to complete this task and conduct multiple  
          meetings throughout the state.  In order to reduce costs, staff  
          recommends limiting the resolution to requesting CDE to convene  










          one meeting with stakeholders in which the Department could  
          explain the methodology used to calculate the RMR and could  
          receive feedback from stakeholders.  The cost of such a meeting  
          would likely be in the range of $2,000 to $5,000.