BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 56
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 56 (Alquist)
          As Amended  August 17, 2010
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :21-12  
           
           HEALTH              12-4        APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Monning, Ammiano, Carter, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Bradford,        |
          |     |          De La Torre, De |     |Huffman, Coto, Davis, De  |
          |     |Leon, Eng, Hayashi,       |     |Leon, Gatto, Hall,        |
          |     |Hernandez, Jones, Bonnie  |     |Skinner, Solorio,         |
          |     |Lowenthal, V. Manuel      |     |Torlakson, Torrico        |
          |     |Perez, Salas              |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Gaines, Smyth,    |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |
          |     |        Audra Strickland  |     |Nielsen, Norby            |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY :  Permits a health plan that is governed, owned, or  
          operated by a county board of supervisors, a county special  
          commission, a county-organized health system (COHS), or a county  
          health authority, or the County Medical Services Program (CMSP),  
          to form joint ventures for the joint or coordinated offering of  
          health plans to individuals and groups.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :  

          1)Gives a CMSP governing board the power to participate in such  
            a joint venture, provided that it is funded separately from  
            the program and does not impair its financial stability.  
            Permits a CMSP governing board, if it elects to participate in  
            such a joint venture, to contract with a third-party  
            administrator to provide coverage under the joint venture.

          2)Permits the joint ventures to consist of either:

             a)   Contractual relationships entered into in order to pool  
               risk or share networks, or both; or,

             b)   Contractual relationships entered into in order to  
               provide for the joint offering or marketing of health plans  








                                                                  SB 56
                                                                  Page  2


               to individuals and groups.

          3)Requires participating health plans, in forming joint  
            ventures, to seek to contract with designated public  
            hospitals, county health clinics, primary care clinics, and  
            other traditional safety net providers.

          4)Requires joint ventures to meet all the requirements of the  
            Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, one-time fee-supported special fund costs to the  
          Department of Managed Health Care in the range of $200,000 to  
          $500,000 (health plan fees) to license two to five joint  
          ventures established pursuant to authority created in this bill.
           
          COMMENTS  :  According to the author, due to the economic  
          downturn, hundreds of thousands of Californians are joining the  
          ranks of the uninsured or are looking to publicly financed  
          programs for their health coverage.  Compared to persons with  
          health coverage, the uninsured are less likely to have a regular  
          source of care, are likely to delay seeing a doctor, and are  
          less likely to receive preventive health care services.  Based  
          on recent data collected by the Kaiser Family Foundation and  
          other entities, health care costs continue to rise at a faster  
          rate than general inflation and than average wage growth.  The  
          author states that there is a lack of affordable health coverage  
          options particularly for low-income uninsured populations.   
          Because of the cost-effective provider networks these plans use,  
          and their very low levels of overhead, the local health plans  
          have the potential to be a viable coverage alternative for the  
          uninsured, a population they don't currently serve.  By  
          clarifying their ability to form joint ventures to serve the  
          uninsured, the author asserts that this bill will tap into the  
          potential these plans offer for providing cost-effective  
          coverage. 

          According to the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), as  
          of December 2009, managed care served about 3.8 million Medi-Cal  
          beneficiaries in 25 counties (representing 52% of the total  
          Medi-Cal population).  In California, there are three models of  
          managed care:  

          1)In the COHS model counties, DHCS contracts with a health plan  








                                                                  SB 56
                                                                  Page  3


            created by the County Board of Supervisors.  Local government,  
            health care providers, community groups and Medi-Cal  
            beneficiaries all can give input in creating the health plan.   
            In a COHS county, everyone is in the same managed care plan.   
            COHS serve about 811,500 beneficiaries through five health  
            plans in 11 counties: Merced, Monterey, Napa, Orange, San  
            Mateo, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, Solano,  
            Sonoma, and Yolo.  Ventura's program is in formation, and is  
            expected to be implemented between October 2010 and January  
            2011.

          2)In most Two-Plan model counties, there is a "Local Initiative"  
            (LI) and a "commercial plan" (CP).  DHCS contracts with both  
            plans. Local government, community groups and health care  
            providers all can give input in creating the LI. The LI is  
            designed to meet the needs and concerns of the community. The  
            CP is a private insurance plan that also provides care for  
            Medi-Cal beneficiaries.  Two-Plan serves about 2.6 million  
            beneficiaries in 12 counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno,  
            Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco,  
            San Joaquin, Santa Clara, Stanislaus, and Tulare.  

          3)In GMC counties, DHCS contracts with several commercial plans.  
            This provides several choices for beneficiaries, so the health  
            plans may want to try different ways to deliver care to  
            members.  GMC serves about 387,000 beneficiaries in two  
            counties: Sacramento and San Diego.

          CMSP provides medical care services in 34 primarily rural  
          counties to indigent adults 21-64 years of age with incomes at  
          or below 200% of the federal poverty level who are not eligible  
          for Medi-Cal and who are U.S. citizens or legal residents. 


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916)  
          319-2097 


                                                                FN: 0006097