BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                    SB 67|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 67 
          Author:   Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee
          Amended:  9/4/09
          Vote:     27 - Urgency

           
           SENATE FLOOR  :  26-1, 9/12/09 (FAIL)
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, Correa,  
            DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu,  
            Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla,  
            Pavley, Price, Romero, Simitian, Steinberg, Wiggins,  
            Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Denham
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Cox,  
            Dutton, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Runner, Strickland,  
            Walters, Wyland

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  62-12, 9/11/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Property tax revenues:  Proposition 1A  
          receivables

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :     Assembly Amendments  delete the prior version of  
          the bill expressing the intent of the Legislature to enact  
          statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009.

          This bill now makes clean up revisions to the Proposition  
          1A (2004) suspension and securitizing provisions of the  
          July 2009-10 Budget Act enacted through AB 15XXXX (Gaines),  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 67
                                                                Page  
          2

          Chapter 14, Statutes of 2009, Fourth Extraordinary Session.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          This bill:

          1. Increases the minimum size of the Joint Powers Authority  
             (JPA) from 100 local agencies to 250 local agencies.   
             Ensures the bonds are sold by a single JPA instead of  
             multiple JPAs, thereby minimizing costs to the state.

          2. Clarifies and revises various dates and timelines to  
             streamline the process and eliminate potential ambiguity  
             for bond investors.

          3. Allows bond proceeds to be used to reimburse the State  
             Treasurer (Treasurer) for his work in reviewing the  
             bonds, and provide a streamlined contracting process so  
             the Treasurer can quickly procure fiscal advisory  
             services.  Under the existing language, the Treasurer  
             and the Director of the Department of Finance (DOF) have  
             certain oversight responsibilities to protect the  
             interests of the state.

          4. Removes the requirement for at least two early call  
             dates, and instead allow periodic interest payments, as  
             approved by the Director of DOF and the Treasurer.   
             Removing the early call date requirement will provide  
             more flexibility to negotiate terms that minimize  
             interest and other costs.

          5. Revises the extreme hardship exemption process such that  
             the determination is made after the anticipated sales of  
             bonds, but not later than December 1, 2009.  If bonds  
             are successfully sold and allocated, locals will see no  
             revenue loss or delay associated with the Proposition 1A  
             suspension, and no hardship exemptions will be granted.

          6. Adds "city" and "a city and county" to the existing  
             authority for a county to borrow funds from a  
             Redevelopment Agency.  An RDA would have the option, but  
             not be required, to loan funds to a city, county, or  
             city and county to fully or partially replace their  
             Proposition 1A reduction.  No such loan could be made if  







                                                                 SB 67
                                                                Page  
          3

             the Redevelopment Agency has itself borrowed from its  
             Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund.

          7. Makes other technical and clarifying changes requested  
             by local governments, bond counsel, and the Treasurer's  
             Office to facilitate the securitization of Proposition  
             1A receivables.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee,  
            Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan,  
            Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway,  
            Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, Eng,  
            Evans, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Galgiani,  
            Garrick, Gilmore, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal,  
            Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen,  
            John A. Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana,  
            Skinner, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson,  
            Torres, Torrico, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Anderson, Bill Berryhill, DeVore, Fletcher, Gaines,  
            Harkey, Knight, Miller, V. Manuel Perez, Silva, Smyth,  
            Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Adams, Hagman, Huber, Jeffries, Tran,  
            Vacancy


          DLW:cm  10/12/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****