BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 82
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 82 (Hancock)
          As Amended  June 14, 2010
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :Vote not relevant  
           
           HIGHER EDUCATION    9-0                                         
           
           -------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Block, Norby, Adams,      |
          |     |Chesbro, Fong, Fuller,    |
          |     |Galgiani, Portantino,     |
          |     |Ruskin                    |
          |     |                          |
           -------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Increases the maximum amounts that California  
          Community College (CCC) district governing boards (boards) are  
          authorized to charge for parking and transportation services.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Increases the maximum amount that a board can charge students  
            and employees for parking services from $40 to $50 per  
            semester and from $20 to $25 per intersession and provides  
            that the fee shall only be required of those using the CCC  
            district's parking services.

          2)Increases the maximum amount that a board can charge for  
            ridesharing and carpooling parking services from $30 to $35  
            per semester and from $10 to $15 per intersession.  

          3)Increases the maximum amount that a board can charge for  
            transportation services from $60 to $70 per semester and from  
            $30 to $35 per intersession.  

          4)Provides that a board may increase parking or transportation  
            services fees by up to the same percentage as the increase in  
            the Implicit Price Deflator for State and Local Government  
            Purchases of Goods and Services published by the United States  
            Department of Commerce between January 1, 2011, and the  
            operative date of a proposed increase in the fee.

          5)Deletes unnecessary and duplicative language regarding CCC  
            transportation services fees.








                                                                  SB 82
                                                                  Page  2



          6)Continues requirements that a majority of a CCC district's  
            students and/or employees vote to support a transportation  
            services fee before a fee can be charged to any group of  
            students and/or faculty not using the service.  

          7)Deletes existing law that prohibits a CCC district from  
            entering into a contract for transportation services until a  
            majority of students have voted to support the fee. 

          8)Deletes existing law that prohibits a CCC district from  
            entering into a transportation services contract for more than  
            10 years.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  This bill has been keyed non-fiscal by  
          Legislative Counsel.  

           COMMENTS  :  This bill has been substantially amended in the  
          Assembly.  The original contents of this bill have been deleted  
          and the current contents of this bill were not heard in the  
          Senate.
           
          Background  :  AB 2812 (Higher Education Committee), Chapter 954,  
          Statutes of 1998, reorganized CCC parking fee provisions,  
          authorized all CCC governing boards to levy fees to fund parking  
          facility construction and transportation services, and  
          established the maximum fee amounts CCCs are authorized to  
          charge for parking and transportation services.  

           Purpose of this bill  :  According to the author, a number of CCC  
          districts are working to initiate and expand transit and parking  
          services for students and faculty.  However, CCC districts are  
          bumping up against the fee ceilings set in current law.  The  
          author believes the current fee ceilings, established over a  
          decade ago, create a disincentive for CCC districts to provide  
          discounted mass transit and increased parking opportunities for  
          students and faculty.  This bill would address this problem by  
          increasing the maximum amount CCC districts are authorized to  
          charge for parking and transportation services.  
           
          Arguments in support  :  This bill is supported by numerous CCC  
          districts.  Supporters argue that the parking and transportation  
          fee caps in current law have remained unchanged for over 10  
          years, while costs for CCC districts to offer parking and  








                                                                  SB 82
                                                                  Page  3


          transportation services have increased significantly over the  
          years since the original limit was placed in statute.   
          Supporters believe that this change in law will allow CCC  
          districts to better cover costs associated with parking services  
          and public mass transit options for students, without having to  
          use general purpose funding that could better serve students in  
          the classroom.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916)  
          319-3960 


                                                                FN: 0005004