BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           95 (Corbett)
          
          Hearing Date:  05/11/2009           Amended: 05/04/2009
          Consultant: Mark McKenzie       Policy Vote: Jud 3-2
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:   SB 95 would enact the California Car Buyers'  
          Protection Act of 2009.  Specifically, this bill would:
           Require a motor vehicle dealer to pay off any outstanding  
            liens on a vehicle purchased for purposes of resale within two  
            business days, as specified.
           Make failure to comply with the above provision regarding  
            dealer pay off unlawful under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act  
            as an unfair or deceptive act or practice.
           Increase the amount of a vehicle dealer's surety bond from  
            $50,000 to $100,000 and establish a bond requirement of  
            $50,000 for dealers of trailers designed for vessel transport  
            as a condition for licensure by the Department of Motor  
            Vehicles (DMV).
           Allow a person, until January 1, 2015, to recover actual  
            damages plus any incidental and consequential damages, rather  
            than an amount not to exceed the value of the vehicle  
            purchased from or sold to the dealer, with respect to existing  
            rights of action against a dealer, salespersons, and the  
            dealer's surety bond.
           Establish the following priorities for satisfaction of claims  
            against a dealer's surety bond: (1) DMV; (2) persons who  
            bought or leased a motor vehicle; (3) finance companies,  
            creditors, or other commercial entities, with specified  
            limits.  Subject to these priorities, claimants would be paid  
            in full if the bond is sufficient, otherwise payment would be  
            on a pro-rata basis.

          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2009-10      2010-11       2011-12     Fund
           
          DMV: bond requirements $50        $150        $150      Special*

          DMV: lien payoff complaints       $375        $750       
          $750Special*










          ____________
          * Motor Vehicle Account
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.
          
          The DMV reports that the number of consumer complaints involving  
          a dealer's failure to pay off a trade-in has risen significantly  
          from prior years.  As of the end of February 2009, the DMV  
          states that it is investigating 256 active cases where a dealer  
          has failed to pay off a consumer's trade-in and 564 additional  
          consumer complaints that the consumer had not yet received  
          verification that title to a vehicle bought from or sold to a  
          dealer had been transferred.  This bill is intended to address  
          the consumer problems that have arisen from increases in  
          dealership closures.  

          Page 2
          SB 95 (Corbett)

          DMV indicates that provisions of the bill that increase a  
          dealer's bond requirements generate both one-time costs for  
          revisions of forms and publications and ongoing costs over a  
          three year period related to the impact on the dealer license  
          renewal process.  Based upon experience when motor vehicle  
          bonding requirements were raised after the passage of SB 1458  
          (Romero), Chapter 303 of 2002, DMV estimates one-time costs of  
          approximately $50,000 to implement SB 95, and ongoing staffing  
          costs of approximately $150,000 annually over three years.  DMV  
          renews roughly 6,000 dealer licenses each year.  The changes to  
          the bonding requirements would likely result in a number of late  
          or incomplete renewal applications, adding an average of 20-30  
          minutes of staff time to each renewal.  Furthermore, DMV  
          estimates that some dealers would decide not to renew the dealer  
          license because of the increased bonding requirements.  Each  
          business closure requires approximately eight hours of DMV staff  
          time.

          Provisions of the bill that require a dealer to pay off any  
          outstanding liens on a vehicle purchased for purposes of resale  
          within two business days would have an impact on the Division of  
          Investigations.  DMV currently fields about 28,000 complaints a  
          year related to lien payoffs and failure of dealers to process  
          registration and title transfer paperwork within specified  










          timeframes.  DMV estimates that SB 95 could generate an  
          additional 2000 to 4000 complaints from the sellers of trade-in  
          vehicles, purchasers of vehicles, lien holders, and other  
          dealers.  Assuming an average of four hours of Investigator  
          staff time for each complaint, this bill could require an  
          additional 5-10 PY ongoing at costs in the range of $500,000 to  
          $1 million annually.  Staff estimates that while initial  
          staffing pressures may be on the high end of this range,  
          complaints would likely taper off somewhat as the industry and  
          consumers adjust to the lien payoff requirements.