BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 104|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 104
Author: Oropeza (D), et al
Amended: 4/30/09
Vote: 21
SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE : 5-2, 4/27/09
AYES: Simitian, Corbett, Hancock, Lowenthal, Pavley
NOES: Runner, Ashburn
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
SUBJECT : California Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006:
Greenhouse gases
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill makes changes to the definition of
"greenhouse gases" and makes other clarifying changes to
provisions of the California Global Warming Solutions Act
of 2006.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law, under the California Global Warming Solutions
Act of 2006 (Act):
1. Requires the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to
determine the 1990 statewide greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions level and approve a statewide GHG emissions
CONTINUED
SB 104
Page
2
limit that is equivalent to that level, to be achieved
by 2020. ARB must adopt regulations for reporting and
verification of GHG emissions, monitoring and compliance
with the program, and achieving GHG emission reductions
from sources or categories of sources by January 1,
2011, to be operative on January 1, 2012, subject to
certain requirements. (Health and Safety Code 38500 et
seq.).
2. Contains definitions for certain terms, and defines
"greenhouse gases" to include carbon dioxide, methane,
nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and
sulfur hexafluoride.
This bill:
1. Adds "nitrogen trifluoride" under the definition of
"greenhouse gases," as well as any other gas designated
as a GHG by the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change and any amendments and protocols.
2. Provides that GHG emission limits and emission reduction
measures are not required to be adopted by the ARB by
January 1, 2011, for a GHG designated by the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and any
amendments and protocols.
3. Requires the ARB to adopt emission limits and emission
reduction measures for a gas designated as a greenhouse
gas by the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change or by the ARB within two years of a
designation as a greenhouse gas.
Please refer to the Senate Environmental Quality Committee
analysis for a full discussion on the definition of
Greenhouse Gas.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: Yes
SUPPORT : (Verified 5/19/09)
American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees, AFL-CIO
SB 104
Page
3
Sierra Club California
Union of Concerned Scientists
The Coalition for Clean Air
American Lung Association
Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies
OPPOSITION : (Verified 5/19/09)
CalChamber
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The author's office cites two 2008
studies regarding nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and notes that
NF3 "was not widely used in the 1990s when the Kyoto
Protocol was negotiated, and until these two studies were
released many in science, industry and government believed
that NF3 was a harmless replacement to other damaging gases
used by industries." According to the author's office,
studies found that NF3 has a global warming potential
17,000 times greater than CO2, persists in the atmosphere
550 years, and is used in the manufacture of several
consumer items, including photovoltaic solar panels, LCD
television screens, and microprocessors.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : The opponents do not believe it
is in the state's best interest to automatically shift
additional regulatory authority to the already expansive
authority and heavy workload of the California Air
Resources Board. The opponents contend that the AB 32
implementation process has revealed the many complex issues
involved with regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The
opponents are concerned that additional requirements and
regulatory measures will take time away from the crucial
measures being developed now. The opponents contend that
adding new sources to be regulated, without first
determining the significance of their contribution to
statewide emissions and before giving appropriate direction
to the regulatory agency, is unnecessary and unwise. The
opponents believe that prior to giving regulatory authority
to any agency, the legislature should review United Nations
Convention decisions on particular emission sources, debate
the issues surrounding regulation of those emissions, and
make fully informed policy decisions for the good of
California.
SB 104
Page
4
TSM:do 5/26/09 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****