BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 124|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 124
          Author:   Oropeza (D)
          Amended:  4/30/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SEN. TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  7-4, 5/12/09
          AYES:  Lowenthal, DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Oropeza, Pavley,  
            Simitian, Wolk
          NOES:  Huff, Ashburn, Harman, Hollingsworth


           SUBJECT  :    Schoolbus idling and idling at schools

           SOURCE :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill codifies an existing regulation  
          adopted by the California Air Resources Board to limit the  
          idling of school buses, school pupil activity buses, youth  
          buses, transit buses, general public paratransit vehicles,  
          and other commercial motor vehicles at or near schools and  
          makes the penalty consistent with the penalty for  
          commercial motor vehicles that violate ARB's rule to limit  
          diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicle idling.

           ANALYSIS  :    The California Toxic Air Contaminant  
          Identification and Control Program requires ARB to identify  
          and control toxic air contaminants (TAC).  Following the  
          identification of a substance as a TAC, existing law  
          requires ARB to prepare a report on the need and  
          appropriate degree of regulation for that substance.  ARB  
          identified diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) as a TAC  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 124
                                                                Page  
          2

          in August 1998.  A needs assessment for diesel PM was  
          published in October 2000 as the "Risk Reduction Plan to  
          Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled  
          Engines and Vehicles."  In this Risk Reduction Plan, ARB  
          indicated that idling measures could be used to "limit the  
          amount of time heavy-duty vehicle engines are allowed to  
          operate while not performing useful work, e.g., moving the  
          vehicle or operating essential equipment."

          In December 2002, ARB adopted a regulation to limit school  
          bus idling and idling at schools in order to reduce  
          children's and the general public's exposure to diesel PM  
          and other pollutants from school buses, school pupil  
          activity buses, youth buses, general paratransit vehicles,  
          transit buses, and heavy-duty commercial motor vehicles  
          that operate at or near schools.

          Effective July 2003, this regulation requires the driver of  
          a school bus, school pupil activity bus, youth bus, general  
          paratransit vehicle, transit bus, and a commercial motor  
          vehicle to turn off the engine upon arriving at a school  
          and to restart it no more than 30 seconds before departing.  
           A driver of a bus or vehicle whose primary purpose is the  
          transport of children (i.e., a school bus, school pupil  
          activity bus, youth bus, or general public paratransit  
          vehicle) is subject to the same requirement when operating  
          within 100 feet of a school and is prohibited from idling  
          more than five minutes at locations beyond schools.  A  
          driver of a transit bus or other commercial motor vehicle,  
          whose primary purpose is not the transport of children, is  
          prohibited from idling more than five minutes within 100  
          feet of a school.

          In addition, the regulation requires a motor carrier of an  
          affected bus or vehicle to ensure that drivers are informed  
          of the idling requirements, to track complaints and  
          enforcement actions regarding the requirements, and to keep  
          records of such driver education and tracking activities.

          The regulation exempts specific idling situations where  
          health, safety, or operational concerns take precedence.   
          For example, exemptions are provided for idling in the  
          midst of traffic; to ascertain safe operating conditions of  
          a bus or vehicle; for test, service, repair, or diagnostic  







                                                                SB 124
                                                                Page  
          3

          purposes, to accomplish work, other than transportation,  
          for which a vehicle was designed (e.g., controlling cargo  
          temperature or operating a lift, drill, etc.); to operate  
          equipment needed by persons with disabilities and heaters  
          or air conditioners for special needs children; to operate  
          defrosters or other equipment to prevent a safety or health  
          emergency; and to recharge a hybrid electric bus or  
          vehicle.

          The regulation to limit school bus idling and idling at  
          schools may be enforced by ARB, peace officers, or air  
          districts.  A violation of any provision is subject to a  
          minimum civil penalty of $100 ad specified criminal  
          penalties.

          In 2004, ARB adopted a rule that, effective February 2005,  
          prohibits the idling of diesel-fueled commercial vehicles  
          for more than five minutes, regardless of the location.  At  
          the time, the minimum civil penalty accompanying a  
          violation of this rule was $100.  In 2007, however, the  
          Legislature passed AB 233 (Jones), Chapter 593, which  
          increased the minimum penalty to $300.

          This bill codifies the regulation to limit school bus  
          idling and idling near schools, and conforms the minimum  
          penalty for a violation of this rule to the minimum penalty  
          ($300) for a violation of the rule to limit the idling of  
          commercial motor vehicles.

           Prior Legislation

             In 2004, the Legislature passed AB 2644 (Oropeza), a  
            nearly identical measure to this one.  The Governor  
            vetoed the bill with the following message:

            "Improving the quality of our air is a priority of my  
            administration.  Through the budget and other  
            legislative efforts we have committed millions of  
            dollars towards clean air programs that are assured to  
            make significant improvements in air quality, including  
            upgrading our aging school bus fleet to new cleaner  
            burning less polluting busses.

            "However, AB 2644 is duplicative of existing state  







                                                                SB 124
                                                                Page  
          4

            regulations for idling school buses and is unnecessary.  
             This bill will limit the California air Resources  
            Boards [sic] discretionary authority to modify the  
            program.  Future refinements, such as changes to  
            reporting and training provisions and other substantive  
            and nonsubstantive amendments would need to go through  
            the legislative process and be approved by the  
            Governor.  This is an unnecessary level of  
            micro-management that the states regulatory system is  
            designed to address."

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/14/09)

          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          American Lung Association of California
          California State PTA
          County Health Executives Association of California
          Independent Private Schools of California
          Planning and Conservation League
          Sierra Club of California


          JJA:cm  5/14/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****