BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
128 (Padilla)
Hearing Date: 05/28/2009 Amended: 4/2/2009
Consultant: Brendan McCarthy Policy Vote: EQ 5-2
SB 128 (Padilla)
Page 2
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 128 establishes the California Climate Change
Institute and requires the Institute to support research and
education programs relating to climate change and greenhouse gas
emissions.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund
Administering research Unknown, potentially in the
millionsUnknown
programs
Research funding Unknown, potentially in the tens of
millions Unknown
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: Suspense File.
SB 128 would create the California Climate Change Institute.
Under the bill, the Institute would be tasked with a)
identifying and supporting research and education relating to
climate change, b) overseeing, coordinating, and managing a
research and development program for meeting the state's
greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and mitigating the
impacts of climate change, and 3) developing educational
curricula to support emerging green technology industries.
This bill does not specify a governance structure for the
Institute, the size or scope of the research to be undertaken by
the Institute, or the funding source for the Institute's
operating costs or research.
On April 29, 2009 the California Public Utilities Commission
administratively established the California Institute for
Climate Solutions, to conduct research into climate
change-related topics. The anticipated budget for the institute
was $60 million per year, funded from electricity and natural
gas ratepayers. AB 1338 (Committee on Budget, 2007) clarified
existing law which prohibits the commission from
administratively creating or funding such a program.
SB 128 (Padilla)
Page 2
Last session, SB 1762 (Perata) proposed to create the California
Climate Change Research and Workforce Development Institute at
the University of California. The purpose of the bill was to
support research on ways to reduce or mitigate greenhouse gas
emissions. SB 1762 would have been funded from about $10 million
per year in existing natural gas ratepayer funds and up to $30
million per year from a new surcharge on electricity ratepayers.
The Governor vetoed SB 1762, with the following veto message:
I am returning Senate Bill 1762 without my signature.
This bill would establish the California Climate Change
Institute within the University of California (UC) to perform
climate change research and develop educational and green
workforce development strategies. Funding for the institute
comes from a redirection of public interest energy research
(PIER) funds and authorization of a new surcharge on electric
service provided by investor- and publicly-owned utilities.
Unfortunately, this bill is too limiting and is too premature to
be signed this year.
First, the bill places the institute entirely within the UC
system. Doing so does not recognize the role that the other
segments of California's higher education system can provide,
not only for climate change research, but for the development
and deployment of new technologies that will reduce our
greenhouse gas emissions and keep California at the forefront of
these emerging technologies.
Additionally, this bill is premature because the Air Resources
Board (ARB) is still developing the Scoping Plan required by the
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. This plan should be in
place prior to re-organizing the way climate change research in
the state is conducted.
Finally, the bill prohibits ratepayer-funded climate change
research in other state agencies. This is ill-advised as it may
deprive the state from being able to receive federal funding for
projects that must be administered by particular state agencies.
It would be a disservice to Californians if the state could not
fully participate in federal funding paid for by their tax
dollars.
SB 128 (Padilla)
Page 2