BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 136
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 7, 2009

                   ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
                                 Mary Hayashi, Chair
                      SB 136 (Huff) - As Amended:  June 23, 2009

           SENATE VOTE  :   36-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   State real property.

           SUMMARY  :   Authorizes the Department of General Services (DGS)  
          to dispose of all or any portion of three specific parcels of  
          state owned real property.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          Authorizes DGS to dispose of all or any portion of the following  
          three specific parcels of state owned real property:

          1)Parcel #1, consisting of approximately 2.76 acres, known as  
            the Harts Mills Forest Fire Station (Old), located at 9476  
            Oro-Quincy Highway, in Berry Creek, Butte County;

          2)Parcel #2, consisting of approximately 47 acres, known as the  
            Mendocino Ranger Station Excess Land, located at 17501 North  
            Highway 101, in Willits, Mendocino County; and,

          3)Parcel #3, consisting of an approximately 85 acres, known as  
            the East Campus of the Agnews Developmental Center in Santa  
            Clara County, and specifies the resolution or mitigation of  
            any disputes or claims related to the land lease agreement and  
            the energy purchase agreement between the state and Agnews  
            Developmental Center Cogeneration Facility, dated December 31,  
            1990, shall be a cost of sale of all of the property  
            authorized to be disposed of at the East Campus.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires DGS to perform various functions with respect to  
            state property and provides for the sale, lease, or transfer  
            of surplus state property.

          2)Requires DGS to request authorization from the Legislature  
            prior to the disposition by sale or otherwise of state land  
            reported to it by a state agency as being in excess of its  
            foreseeable needs.  Each state agency is required to annually  
            review proprietary state lands under its jurisdiction to  








                                                                  SB 136
                                                                  Page  2

            determine what lands are in excess of the agency's foreseeable  
            needs and to report to DGS.

          3)Provides criteria for state agencies to use in determining and  
            reporting to DGS lands in excess of the agency's foreseeable  
            needs.  A state agency is to include land not currently being  
            utilized, or currently being underutilized, for any existing  
            or ongoing program; land for which the agency has not  
            identified any specific utilization relative to future needs;  
            and land not identified by the agency within its master plan  
            for facility development.

          4)Requires DGS to determine if surplus land is needed by any  
            other state agency, and to first offer surplus state real  
            property to local agencies, and then to nonprofit affordable  
            housing sponsors, as defined, prior to offering the property  
            to private entities. Existing law also prescribes the  
            procedure for local agencies and nonprofit affordable housing  
            sponsors to use to obtain the surplus state real property.

          5)Specifies that the Legislature may authorize a particular  
            surplus property be sold at less than fair market value and  
            provides that 30 days prior to executing such a transaction,  
            DGS must report to the chairs of the fiscal committees of the  
            Legislature the following information: the financial terms of  
            the transaction; a comparison of fair market value for the  
            property and financial terms; and the basis for agreeing to  
            terms and conditions other than fair market value.

          6)Exempts the sale of surplus property from designated  
            provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).  
             Specifically, the law provides that any disposition of a  
            parcel of surplus property made on an "as-is" basis shall be  
            exempt from statutory requirements of CEQA; however, the law  
            makes it explicit that the buyer or transferee of a parcel  
            shall be subject to any local governmental entitlement or land  
            use approval requirements and CEQA.  Furthermore, existing law  
            provides that if any transaction is not on an "as-is" basis  
            sale and close of escrow is contingent on satisfying any local  
            governmental approvals for entitlement or land use  
            requirements, including compliance by the local government  
            with CEQA, then the execution of the purchase and sale  
            agreement or exchange agreement is exempt from CEQA.

          7)Requires, pursuant to Proposition 60A of November 2004, SCA  








                                                                  SB 136
                                                                  Page  3

            18, Johnson, Resolution Chapter 103/04, that the proceeds from  
            the sale of surplus state property, with specified exceptions,  
            be used to pay the principal and interest on the Economic  
            Recovery Bond Act of 2004.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

           Purpose of this bill  .  This bill is the annual surplus property  
          bill sponsored by DGS.  According to DGS, "This bill is  
          necessary to dispose of three excess properties identified by  
          State agencies."

           Background - General  .  In the early 1990s, DGS undertook a  
          program to save money and make government more accessible to  
          citizens by rearranging state offices in major urban centers.   
          The plan also envisioned consolidation in numerous other  
          California communities where the state leased dispersed office  
          space.  Based on a series of regional plans and facility  
          studies, DGS' efforts led to office consolidation projects  
          (completed or in the process of development) in major  
          metropolitan areas (e.g., San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles,  
          Riverside/San Bernardino, Long Beach, San Diego and Sacramento).

          Under the provisions of Proposition 60A, the proceeds of the  
          sale of surplus property must be used to pay the holders of the  
          state's deficit reduction bonds.  These payments are intended to  
          accelerate the redemption of the state's debt, and reduce future  
          General Fund payments to the bondholders.  

          The ability to get excess properties declared surplus by the  
          Legislature has been impeded these past few years by a  
          disagreement between the Legislature and the Administration  
          regarding the removal of a statutory exemption for the State's  
          surplus properties from the requirements of CEQA.  This  
          disagreement has at least for now been resolved with enactment  
          of AB 8xx (Nestande), Chapter 6 of 2009-10 Second Extraordinary  
          Session, that places within Section 11011 of the Government Code  
          an ongoing CEQA exemption for all properties declared surplus by  
          the Legislature. 

           Background - Agnews Developmental Center  .  In 1876, the State  
          purchased 323.5 acres of farmland from Abraham Agnews.  Agnews  
          State Hospital was established in 1885 as a neuropsychiatric  








                                                                  SB 136
                                                                  Page  4

          institution for the care and treatment of persons with mental  
          illnesses.  This facility became known as the West Campus.

          In 1926, the State acquired an additional 424 acres (known as  
          the East Campus), which was located one and one-half mile from  
          the main facility (which became the West Campus).

          Approximately 337 acres of the original East Campus has been  
          sold or transferred.  Most significant, was the sale of  
          approximately 140 acres to Cisco Systems (Cisco) in the  
          mid-1990's.  Also, in the mid-1990's the West Campus was closed  
          and declared surplus.   This property was sold in stages and  
          became the corporate headquarters for Sun Micro Systems, as well  
          as a new mixed-use community known as the Rivermark Development.  


          The Agnews East currently resides on the remaining 87 acres on  
          the north edge of the city of San Jose, in the heart of Silicon  
          Valley.  As of April 2009, under the closure plan, the  
          Department of Developmental Services has transferred all the  
          clients to community based housing facilities or to other DDS  
          facilities. There are 51 buildings on the campus, comprising  
          approximately 692,800 gross square feet of space.  
          
          A third party owned cogeneration plant provides thermal and  
          electrical energy to Agnews and markets electricity to PG&E.   
          The cogeneration agreements expire in the year 2020.

          DGS is the lead agency in facilitating the future use of the  
          real estate, existing leases, structures and infrastructure of  
          the campus, including disposition of the cogeneration plant.  

          The Department of Developmental Services has responsibility for  
          maintaining the property until DGS transfers or otherwise  
          disposes of the asset.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Department of General Services (sponsor)
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.








                                                                  SB 136
                                                                  Page  5



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Ross Warren / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301