BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 147|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 147
          Author:   DeSaulnier (D), et al
          Amended:  6/21/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/15/09
          AYES:  Romero, Huff, Alquist, Maldonado, Padilla, Simitian,  
            Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hancock, Liu

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, DeSaulnier, Hancock,  
            Leno, Oropeza, Runner, Walters, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR  :  39-0, 6/2/09
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Calderon,  
            Cedillo, Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham,  
            DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman,  
            Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal,  
            Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Romero, Runner, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Walters,  
            Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  76-1, 9/2/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    University admission requirements:  career  
          technical
                      education

           SOURCE  :     State Building and Construction Trades Council
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 147
                                                                Page  
          2



           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Trustees of the  
          California State University (CSU), on or before January 1,  
          2014, to develop and implement a procedure for allowing  
          students to satisfy a general elective course requirement  
          for purposes of admission to CSU by completing a high  
          school career technical education (CTE) course that meets  
          criteria established by the State Board of Education,  
          subject to the approval of the Academic Senate.

           Assembly Amendments  requires the CSU Trustees to recognize  
          courses that meet the State Board of Education CTE model  
          curriculum standards as satisfying the completion of a  
          general elective course for the purposes of admission if,  
          by January 1, 2014, CSU has not complied with the  
          provisions of this bill.

           ANALYSIS  :    The State Board of Education (SBE) adopted  
          Model Curriculum Standards for CTE in May 2005 and adopted  
          the curriculum frameworks for those standards in January  
          2007.  The standards are organized in 15 industry sectors  
          of interrelated occupations and broad industries.  The  
          standards identify 58 different career pathways and the  
          academic and technical courses required for each pathway.

          The California State University (CSU) and the University of  
          California (UC) have established common high school  
          coursework requirements for undergraduate admissions.   
          Students who take courses that meet these minimum subject  
          area requirements and who meet other specified criteria are  
          eligible to apply and be considered for admission to  
          campuses within these institutions.  The following pattern  
          of coursework is commonly referred to as the "a-g"  
          requirements:

          A. 2 years of history/social science
          B. 4 years of college preparatory English or language  
             instruction
          C. 3 years of college preparatory mathematics
          D. 2 years of laboratory science
          E. 2 years of the same language other than English
          F. 1 years of visual and performing art
          G. 1 year college preparatory electives







                                                                SB 147
                                                                Page  
          3


          Existing law, SB 1543 (Alarcon), Chapter 669, Statutes of  
          2006, requires the CSU and requests the UC to adopt model  
          uniform academic standards for CTE that satisfy the  
          completion of general elective ("g") course requirements  
          for the purposes of admission.  SB 1543 specified if the  
          model academic standards were not adopted by July 1, 2008,  
          the Board of Trustees (Trustees) of the CSU would have been  
          required and the Regents of the UC would have been  
          requested to recognize the completion of all high school  
          courses that meet the CTE standards adopted by the SBE as  
          satisfying the completion of the general elective course  
          requirement.  The CSU and UC satisfied the requirements of  
          SB 1543 in spring 2008.

          This bill:

          1.Requires the CSU Trustees  to develop and implement a  
            process whereby high school CTE courses would satisfy a  
            general elective course requirement for purposes of  
            admission to CSU that meet either of the following  
            criteria:

             A.    Adopt standards, in consultation with the SBE,  
                that satisfy the completion of general elective  
                course requirements for CSU admission; or,

             B.    Base standards on the model curriculum standards  
                established by the SBE and any additional criteria  
                that CSU faculty identify as necessary to prepare  
                students for success in coursework unique to a  
                specific major or educational program.

          2.Requires the CSU Trustees to recognize courses that meet  
            the SBE CTE model curriculum standards as satisfying the  
            completion of a general elective course for the purposes  
            of admission if, by January 1, 2014, CSU has not complied  
            with the provisions of this bill.

          3.Requires the criteria to be developed by CSU faculty and  
            subject to the approval of the CSU Academic Senate, and  
            requires the CSU Trustees to adopt regulations based on  
            the recommendations of the CSU Academic Senate.








                                                                SB 147
                                                                Page  
          4

          4.States that, to the extent possible, costs associated  
            with these activities be covered by the Carl D. Perkins  
            Career and Technical Educational Improvement Act or by  
            other nonstate funds available for the purposes of this  
            bill.

           Jurisdiction  .  Historically, the CSU and UC have had  
          jurisdiction over their admission policies and procedures,  
          including the establishment of coursework required for  
          entry to a campus or major program, required tests, and  
          minimum grade point average standards.

          According to the author's office, the CTC system in  
          California is in a steady decline.  A 20-year period of  
          changing educational funding priorities, various reform  
          movements and cultural pressures regarding the necessity of  
          curriculum to prepare all students for non-career focused  
          baccalaureate degrees has reduced the number of CTE  
          teachers, classes and student enrollment to a historic low  
          in California.  In 2008, only 29.4 percent of students  
          enrolled in high school were enrolled in a CTE course - a  
          decline of 73.8 percent since 1987.  Also, the state has  
          seen a 30 percent loss of CTE teachers since 1987.

          Though there are about 7,000 UC-approved CTE courses  
          offered statewide, the author's office indicates that only  
          a small number of "industrial arts" CTE courses have been  
          approved.  The author's office argues that, while the  
          overwhelming amount of CTE courses in the industrial arts  
          will not qualify for the UC, these courses should qualify  
          for CSU as this institution offers industrial arts degrees.

           Prior Legislation

           AB 876 (Davis), Chapter 650, Statutes of 2008, required the  
          CSU and requested the UC to take specific actions with  
          respect to assisting in the development of CTE courses and  
          recognizing CTE courses in admission criteria and  
          procedures.

          AB 1586 (DeSaulnier), 2007-08 Session, which was held in  
          the Senate Education Committee, would have required CSU to  
          adopt the SBE model CTE curriculum standards.








                                                                SB 147
                                                                Page  
          5

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          For CSU, total one-time General Fund costs of $650,000 to  
          $1.2 million over four years.  This amount assumes CSU  
          would contract with the UC to perform the required course  
          evaluations.  There are about 19,000 CTE courses offered in  
          California high schools that do not meet UC and CSU  
          admissions requirements.  The cost estimate includes  
          $360,000 to $650,000 for evaluation staff, assuming 50  
          percent to 90 percent of CTE courses are submitted for  
          approval under CSU's new criteria.  The other major cost  
          element would be $250,000 to $500,000 to modify CSU's  
          Mentor online admissions portal to account for the new and  
          differing admissions requirements with UC.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/3/09)

          State Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO  
          (source) 
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          California Association of Regional Occupational Centers and  
          Programs
          California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning  
          Contractors'  Association 
          California Automotive Business Coalition 
          California Chapter of the American Fence Contractors'  
          Association
          California Correctional Peace Officers Association
          California Farm Bureau Federation
          California Fence Contractors' Association
          California Industrial and Technology Education Association
          California School Employees Association
          California Space Authority
          California Teachers Association
          Engineer Contractors' Association
          Flasher/Barricade Association
          Los Angeles Unified School District
          Marin Builders' Association
          Metropolitan Education District
          Small School Districts' Association

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  9/3/09)







                                                                SB 147
                                                                Page  
          6


          California State University
          California Postsecondary Education Commission (Unless  
          Amended)
          University of California (introduced version)


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,  
            Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu, Logue,  
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava,  
            Nestande, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner,  
            Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson,  
            Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Niello
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Buchanan, Hall, Vacancy


          DLW:cm  9/3/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****