BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 154
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 15, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                     SB 154 (Benoit) - As Amended:  July 8, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill:

          1)Requires drivers' license suspension for a conviction of  
            boating under the influence (BUI) with a prior BUI or DUI  
            (driving under the influence) offense within seven years. 

          2)Requires, rather than authorizes, courts to impose, as a  
            condition of probation, that every person convicted of BUI  
            complete a licensed DUI program. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time and ongoing costs in the range of $200,000 to the  
            Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to administer BUI license  
            suspension. DMV indicates programming costs and administrative  
            costs related to updating forms and procedures account for the  
            balance of the costs.

          2)Unknown, likely minor annual GF costs to the extent persons  
            who receive felony probation for BUI do not enroll and/or  
            complete the required DUI program. According to DMV figures,  
            95 persons were convicted of BUI in 2008 with prior BUI or DUI  
            convictions. If four persons violated felony probation for not  
            completing the program and were committed to state prison as a  
            result, the annual cost would exceed $150,000.  

          3)Unknown, likely minor annual nonreimbursable local  
            incarceration costs to the extent persons who receive  
            misdemeanor probation for BUI do not enroll and/or complete  
            the required DUI program. 








                                                                  SB 154
                                                                 Page  2


           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . The author contends that BUI penalties should be  
            more akin to DUI penalties, stating, "The same reckless  
            mindset is at work when intoxicated individuals take either  
            the wheel of the car or control of a watercraft. SB 154  
            reflects the seriousness of BUI offenses, protecting the  
            safety of travelers on California's streets, highways, and  
            waterways."

            Current law requires a DUI program for persons convicted of  
            DUI, but for BUI authorizes the judge to order a program for  
            BUI. This bill applies the DUI requirement to BUI. 

            Current law requires drivers' license suspension for DUI.  
            Until last year, DMV believed it had authority to suspend  
            drivers' licenses for BUI. Following a legal challenge,  
            however, the court found that state law does not authorize DMV  
            to suspend the driver's license of an individual convicted of  
            BUI. This bill specifies that BUI with a specified DUI or BUI  
            prior within seven years results in the immediate suspension  
            of the person's driving privilege. 


           2)Current DUI law  provides that a person convicted of a first  
            DUI offense is subject to the following penalties when given  
            probation:  48 hours to 6 months in jail; $390 to $1,000 fine  
            plus penalty assessments; completion of a 3-month treatment  
            program or a 9-month program if the BAC was .20% or more; and  
            a 6-month license suspension, or 10-month suspension if a  
            9-month program is ordered. 


           3)Current BUI law  provides that a person convicted of first-time  
            BUI shall be punished by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or up to  
            six months in county jail. If probation is granted, the court,  
            as a condition of probation, may require the person to  
            complete a licensed drinking driver treatment program. 


           4)Proponents  , including the CA District Attorneys Association,  
            the State Sheriffs Association, and Mothers Against Drunk  
            Driving, contend that 25% of boating-related deaths in  
            California involve alcohol and cite the deterrent value of  








                                                                  SB 154
                                                                  Page  3

            license suspension and mandatory treatment programs. 

           5)Opponents  , including CA Attorneys for Criminal Justice (CACJ),  
            The CA DUI Lawyers Association (CDLA), and the CA Public  
            Defenders Association (CPDA), cite the diminution of judicial  
            discretion, by making treatment programs mandatory, and  
            question the nexus between drinking while boating and drivers  
            license suspension. 

           6)Should BUI be treated similar to DUI?  In many respects boating  
            is recreation, while driving is transportation. As noted by  
            CACJ and CDLA, "the State of California does not treat boating  
            the same as operating a motor vehicle. You must obtain a  
            driver's license to operate a motor vehicle but no license is  
            required for boating. In fact, you may lawfully operate a boat  
            as young as 13 under specified circumstances. California lacks  
            an extensive regulatory scheme for boating as is currently in  
            place for motor vehicles, signaling a recognition that the  
            activities are vastly different."

           7)Is there a sufficient nexus between BUI and driving a car to  
            warrant license suspension for BUI?  Without defending drinking  
            while boating, is suspending a person's drivers' license the  
            appropriate penalty? Many people who boat with a beer would  
            never drive with a beer. According to the CPDA, "this bill  
            would make a drunk boating conviction the basis for suspending  
            ones driver's license if the boater has a prior drunk driving  
            or drunk boating conviction. There are different licensing  
            agencies for operators of motor vehicles and for vessels.  
            There are different skills and training requirements?. One  
            shouldn't suffer the loss of his driver's license, which is  
            crucial for employment and daily necessities because of action  
            that took place in a pleasure craft."

           8)Is there sufficient reason to eliminate judicial discretion,  
            in terms of requiring treatment  ? According to CACJ and CDLA,  
            "Current law appropriately recognizes that a one-size-fits-all  
            approach is overly inclusive and an unnecessary expenditure of  
            resources. SB 154, however, removes this discretion-making  
            authority from the judge and makes such a program referral  
            mandatory. In essence, the practical effect of your measure is  
            to impose a referral to an alcohol program where a judge has  
            determined it is unwarranted. We are unaware of any studies  
            indicating judges are improperly exercising their authority.  
            The courtroom experience of our members indicates that judges  








                                                                  SB 154
                                                                  Page  4

            are more than willing to impose an alcohol program requirement  
            in appropriate cases. Therefore, eliminating judicial  
            discretion is unwarranted." 


           9)Number of DUI and BUI convictions  . In 2007 there were 153,348  
            DUI convictions in California, and 182 BUI convictions (the  
            BUI convictions are based on a four-year average). DMV  
            estimates that about half of the annual BUI convictions have  
            prior related offenses. 



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081