BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
160 (Cedillo)
Hearing Date: 04/20/09 Amended: As Introduced
Consultant: Dan Troy Policy Vote: ED 5-3
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 160 would expand eligibility for state
postsecondary institutional financial aid programs to include
students who are exempted from paying nonresident tuition due to
specified provisions in law.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund
UC aid $800 $1,600 $1,600 General*
CSU aid $1,200 $2,400 $2,400 General*
*Combination of General Fund support and fee revenue
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
AB 540 (Firebaugh) of 2001 exempted individuals from paying
nonresident tuition at public California postsecondary
institutions if they attended a California high school for at
least 3 years, graduated from a California high school or
obtained an equivalent degree, registered or attended an
accredited California postsecondary institution not before the
2001-02 year, and, for an alien without unlawful immigration
status, filed an affidavit stating that the student has applied
to legalize their immigration status or will do so as soon as
eligible. Effectively, the bill provided in-state tuition on
the basis of secondary school attendance rather than on legal
residency. This bill would extend eligibility for
postsecondary institutional financial aid programs to these
pupils. Eligibility would not extend to fee waivers at the
California Community Colleges.
Using 2007-08 data, the University of California (UC) estimates
that 572 AB 540 students would have been eligible for
approximately $1.6 million in institutional aid in that year.
Assuming 65 percent more AB 540 FTEs attend the California State
University (CSU) than UC (CSU has approximately 65 percent more
FTEs than UC), the cost would be approximately $2.4 million,
assuming an average award of $2,536.
While it is unclear what response the institutions would take
toward allocating institutional awards - they may choose to
shift more institutional resources toward aid to meet the
greater eligibility counts or they may allocate lower average
grant awards to keep system-wide costs neutral - it is clear
that increasing the pool of eligibility creates pressure to
increase the amount of institutional resources that go toward
financial aid.
A similar measure, SB 1301 (Cedillo), was vetoed by the Governor
in 2008. The Governor's veto message indicated concern about
placing additional demands on
Page 2
SB 160 (Cedillo)
financial aid resources given the state's fiscal condition.
Related measures were also vetoed in 2007 and 2005.