BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 178|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 178
          Author:   Aanestad (R)
          Amended:  8/31/09
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 4/28/09
          AYES:  Wright, Harman, Benoit, Calderon, Denham, Florez,  
            Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Wiggins, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, DeSaulnier, Hancock,  
            Leno, Oropeza, Runner, Walters, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR  :  39-0, 6/3/09 (Consent) 
          AYES: Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Calderon,  
            Cedillo, Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham,  
            DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman,  
            Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal,  
            Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Romero, Runner, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Walters,  
            Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 75-0, 9/2/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    State property:  Department of Forestry and  
          Fire Protection

           SOURCE  :     City of Redding

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          2


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes the Director of the  
          Department of General Service to sell, lease or exchange  
          approximately three acres of state-owned real property  
          located at 875 Cypress Avenue, in the City of Redding, that  
          is specifically not declared surplus to the State's needs  
          and is currently used by the Department of Forestry and  
          Fire Protection as its Shasta-Trinity Unit Headquarters,  
          for the purpose of consolidating operations on or near the  
          Redding Airport.

           Assembly Amendments  added clarifying language concerning  
          the telecommunications tower and vault located on the  
          Cypress property, and made other clarifying changes. 

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law generally requires the Department  
          of General Services (DGS) to perform various functions with  
          respect to state property and provides for the sale, lease,  
          or transfer of surplus state property.

          Existing law requires the Director of DGS to request  
          authorization by the Legislature prior to the disposition  
          by sale or otherwise of state land reported to it by a  
          state agency as being in excess of its foreseeable needs.   
          Each state agency is required to annually review  
          proprietary state lands under its jurisdiction to determine  
          what lands are in excess of the agency's foreseeable needs  
          and to report to DGS.  

          This annual review of proprietary state lands does not  
          apply to tax-deeded land, land held for highway purposes,  
          lands under the jurisdiction of the State Lands Commission,  
          land that has escheated to the state or that has been  
          distributed to the state by a court decree in estates of  
          deceased persons, and lands under the jurisdiction of the  
          State Coastal Conservancy.  Jurisdiction of all land  
          reported as excess is transferred to DGS, when requested by  
          the Director of DGS, for sale or disposition or as may  
          otherwise be authorized by law.

          Existing law provides criteria for state agencies to use in  
          determining and reporting to DGS lands in excess of the  
          agency's foreseeable needs.  A state agency is to include  
          land not currently being utilized, or currently being  







                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          3

          underutilized, for any existing or ongoing program; land  
          for which the agency has not identified any specific  
          utilization relative to future needs; and land not  
          identified by the agency within its master plan for  
          facility development.

          Where applicable within its jurisdiction, DGS is  
          responsible for determining if surplus land is needed by  
          any other state agency.  Existing law  (Government Code  
          Section 11011.1) requires the state to first offer surplus  
          state real property to local agencies, and next, to offer  
          the property to nonprofit affordable housing sponsors, as  
          defined, prior to offering the property to private  
          entities.  Existing law also prescribes the procedure for  
          local agencies and nonprofit affordable housing sponsors to  
          use to obtain the surplus state real property. 

          Existing law specifies that the Legislature may authorize a  
          particular surplus property be sold at less than fair  
          market value and provides that 30 days prior to executing  
          such a transaction, DGS must report to the chairs of the  
          fiscal committees of the Legislature the following  
          information:  (a) the financial terms of the transaction;  
          (b) a comparison of fair market value for the property and  
          financial terms; (c) the basis for agreeing to terms and  
          conditions other than fair market value. 

          Existing law (Government Code 11011 (k) (1) and (2))  
          contains provisions exempting the sale of surplus property  
          from designated provisions of the California Environmental  
          Quality Act (CEQA).  Specifically, the law provides that  
          any disposition of a parcel of surplus property made on an  
          "as-is" basis shall be exempt from statutory requirements  
          of CEQA; however, the law makes it explicit that the buyer  
          or transferee of a parcel shall be subject to any local  
          governmental entitlement or land use approval requirements  
          and CEQA.
           
           Furthermore, existing law provides that if any transaction  
          is not on an "as-is" basis sale and close of escrow is  
          contingent on satisfying any local governmental approvals  
          for entitlement or land use requirements, including  
          compliance by the local government with CEQA, then the  
          execution of the purchase and sale agreement or exchange  







                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          4

          agreement is exempt from CEQA.  

           Proposition 60A of November 2004 (SCA 18, [Johnson],  
          Resolution Chapter 103, Statutes of 2004) which was adopted  
          by the electorate (73 percent margin) requires, among other  
          things, that the proceeds from the sale of surplus state  
          property, with specified exceptions, be used to pay the  
          principal and interest on the Economic Recovery Bond Act of  
          2004.

          This bill:

           1.   Authorizes DGS to sell, exchange, lease (for no more  
               than 66 years), or any combination thereof, all or a  
               portion of the state-owned Cypress Property in the  
               City of Redding (City) that is currently used by the  
               Department of Forestry and Firefighters (CalFire).

           2.   Requires the Director of the DGS to use the proceeds  
               of any sale, exchange, lease, or any combination  
               thereof to acquire the land and facilities in order to  
               consolidate or expand the operations of the  
               Shasta-Trinity Unit of CalFire.

           3.   Requires DGS to initially offer the Cypress Property  
               to the City for purposes of a local government-owned  
               facility, and under terms and conditions that provide  
               for continuous operation of the state's facilities at  
               the Cypress Property until relocation is accomplished.  
                If the City fails to purchase the property within 120  
               days after notice from DGS, DGS may sell, exchange or  
               lease the property to the public, as specified. 

           4.   Requires any transaction to be for no less than fair  
               market value, as determined by an independent  
               appraisal by DGS or pursuant to a competitive  
               selection process.

           5.   Stipulates that compensation for the Cypress Property  
               may include land, or a combination of land,  
               improvements and money.

           6.   Requires any funds received from the sale, exchange,  
               lease, or combination thereof of all or a portion of  







                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          5

               the Cypress Property to be held in trust and used only  
               for the acquisition, lease, lease-purchase, lease with  
               option to purchase, or lease-purchase finance of the  
               land and facilities and shall be appropriated to the  
               DGS for expenditure for these purposes.

           7.   Authorizes DGS to enter into one or more agreements,  
               contracts, or leases to provide a substitute location  
               and substitute facilities for the Shasta-Trinity Unit  
               Headquarters, and requires DGS to provide for the  
               continuous operation of the state's facilities at the  
               Cypress Property until relocation is accomplished. 

           8.   Provides that, upon appropriation by the Legislature,  
               DGS shall use the proceeds of any sale, exchange, or  
               lease explicitly for consolidation or expansion of the  
               Shasta-Trinity Unit.

           9.   States that the disposition of the Cypress Property  
               is not subject to provisions of law requiring the  
               proceeds from the sale of state surplus property is  
               used to pay the principal and interest on the Economic  
               Recovery Bonds or provisions of law requiring state  
               surplus property be offered first to local government  
               agencies and affordable housing interests.

           10.  Provides that any use or redevelopment of the Cypress  
               Property awarded to a nongovernmental entity and not  
               involving the exercise of sovereign activities of the  
               State or another government agency shall be subject to  
               the zoning and building code regulations of the City.

           11.  Requires DGS to develop the terms and conditions of  
               any disposition agreement and provide them to the  
               Department of Finance (DOF) prior to soliciting bids.   
               Also, requires DGS to obtain approval from DOF prior  
               to execution of any disposition agreement regarding  
               the Cypress Property.

           12.  Requires the Department of General Services to notify  
               the chairperson of the committee in each house of the  
               Legislature that considers appropriations and the  
               Chairperson of the Join Legislative Budget Committee,  
               or his/her designee, in writing of the Director's  







                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          6

               intention to enter into a lease or an agreement, not  
               less than the minimum time that the Chairperson of the  
               Joint Legislative Budget Committee, or his/her  
               designee, may in each instance determine.

           13.  Makes various legislative findings and declarations  
               regarding the Cypress Property.

           Comments
           
          Under the provisions of Proposition 60A, the proceeds of  
          the sale of surplus property must be used to pay the  
          holders of the state's deficit reduction bonds.  These  
          payments are intended to accelerate the redemption of the  
          state's debt, and reduce future General Fund payments to  
          the bondholders.  This bill avoids the transfer of the  
          proceeds associated with the disposition of the property by  
          specifying that the disposition of the Red Bluff Property  
          does not constitute a sale or other disposition of surplus  
          state property that would otherwise be subject to Section 9  
          of Article III of the Constitution.

           CEQA Exemption  .  Last year the Governor vetoed SB 553  
          (Aanestad) which would have authorized DGS to lease, sell,  
          or exchange at fair market value this same parcel of  
          state-owned property in the City of Redding being used by  
          the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as its  
          Shasta-Trinity Unit Headquarters.  The Governor's veto  
          message essentially stated that the disposal of the Redding  
          property and other surplus property should be exempt from  
          CEQA because historically, such properties have generally  
          been exempt from the CEQA process.

          The ability to get excess properties declared surplus by  
          the Legislature has been impeded these past few years by a  
          disagreement between the Legislature and the Administration  
          regarding the removal of a statutory exemption for the  
          State's surplus properties from the requirements of CEQA.   
          This disagreement has at least for now been resolved with  
          enactment of AB 8xx (Nestande), Chapter 6, Statutes of 2009  
          Second Extraordinary Session, that places within Section  
          11011 of the Government Code an ongoing CEQA exemption for  
          all properties declared surplus by the Legislature. 








                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          7

          This bill makes it explicit that its provisions do not  
          constitute a sale or other disposition of surplus property  ,  
          thus, DGS staff contends that a CEQA exemption is not  
          needed for this bill.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

          1.  Minor costs of around $30,000 for DGS to administer the  
              property disposition through lease, sale, or exchange,  
              reimbursed from proceeds of a property sale or from CDF  
              in the case of a lease or exchange. 

          2.  Any net revenue to the state from a sale of the  
              property would presumably be used to offset the costs  
              of a replacement site and facilities for a new CDF unit  
              headquarters. DGS does not have an appraised value of  
              the property. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/3/09)

          City of Redding (source)
          Department of Forestry and Firefighters (CalFire)
          Shasta Trinity Headquarters


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          because of deteriorating and cramped conditions, the City  
          of Redding currently is in the process of looking for a new  
          location for its police headquarters.  A recent review of  
          possible locations for a new police station identified the  
          Cypress Property in Redding as the most suitable site  
          because it is positioned adjacent to City Hall and because  
          it has good ingress and egress for emergency situations.

          However, the property is currently utilized by CalFire as  
          its Shasta-Trinity Unit headquarters.  City staff has  
          worked closely with CalFire to develop a strategy to  
          purchase this state-owned property in exchange for a site  
          approved by CalFire near the Redding Airport which is more  
          suitable for CalFire's needs.








                                                                SB 178
                                                                Page  
          8


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore,  
            Hagman, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman,  
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande,  
            Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner,  
            Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson,  
            Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Buchanan, Furutani, Hall, Logue


          TSM:do  9/3/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****