BILL ANALYSIS
SB 190
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 19, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
SB 190 (Wright) - As Amended: July 1, 2009
Policy Committee: HealthVote:12 - 4
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires the Department of Public Health (DPH) by July
1, 2011, to consult with interested parties and adopt
regulations establishing standards for 100% pomegranate juice.
FISCAL EFFECT
Annual special fund costs of approximately $90,000 (Food Safety
Fund) for two years for DPH to develop standards and adopt
regulations governing the labeling of pomegranate juice.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author contends this bill addresses the
adulteration of pomegranate juice from foreign sources.
According to the author, pomegranate juice from foreign
suppliers in Iran and other Middle Eastern countries is
purchased for well below the established market price for pure
pomegranate juice concentrate and then used in juice products
that are falsely labeled with claims of "100% pomegranate
juice with no sugar added" to induce consumers to purchase the
product in hopes of receiving substantial health benefits.
The author asserts that, given the inherently high cost of
producing pomegranate juice, many suppliers resort to
adulteration, an illegal practice of tainting pomegranate
juice with filler ingredients such as sugar, high fructose
corn syrup, low-cost juices, colorants, and flavor enhancers.
The author notes that California is the only commercial
growing region of pomegranates in the United States and
adulterated pomegranate juice damages California growers by
SB 190
Page 2
driving down the price they get for their commodity.
Supporters, including Roll International, owner of POM and a
member of PURE PJ, the sponsor of this bill, and many
California pomegranate farms and farmers, state that this bill
will lead to the establishment of a standard of identity for
pomegranate juice, similar to the existing standard that
California has for olive oil, and require the labeling of
pomegranate juice as "100% pomegranate juice" to mean exactly
that. Individual pomegranate growers and pomegranate juice
producers argue that this bill will protect the interests of
consumers who wish to buy authentic pomegranate juice and
provide an even playing field for the 250 farmers in the state
who grow commercial pomegranates on 35,000 acres.
2)Opposition . In opposition to the bill, the Department of
Public Health (DPH) writes that existing law already states,
in part, that food fabricated from two or more ingredients is
misbranded unless it bears a label clearly stating that the
common or usual name of each ingredient and, if the food
claims to be a beverage containing vegetable or fruit juice,
it must include a prominent statement on the information panel
disclosing the total percentage of fruit or vegetable juice
contained in the food. Furthermore, DPH adds that any person
who violates these provisions, or violates any regulation
adopted pursuant to these provisions, shall, if convicted, be
subject to fines and/or imprisonment.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081