BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 194|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 194
          Author:   Florez (D)
          Amended:  8/2/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE  :  3-2, 4/29/09
          AYES:  Wiggins, Kehoe, Wolk
          NOES:  Cox, Aanestad

           SENATE FLOOR  :  23-14, 1/28/10
          AYES: Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, Correa, DeSaulnier,  
            Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Lowenthal, Maldonado,  
            Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero,  
            Simitian, Steinberg, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES: Aanestad, Ashburn, Cogdill, Cox, Denham, Dutton,  
            Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Liu, Runner, Strickland,  
            Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Alquist, Ducheny, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  Not available


           SUBJECT  :    Community Equity Investment Act of 2010

           SOURCE  :     California Legal Assistance Foundation


           DIGEST  :    This bill enacts the Community Equity Investment  
          Act of 2010 and specifies how funds received under the  
          federal State Community Development Block Grant Program are  
          expended at the local government level.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 194
                                                                Page  
          2

           Assembly Amendments  delete the version of the bill that  
          passed the Senate and now deals with the same subject  
          matter, community investment, but changed the pertaining  
          year from 2009 to 2010.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing law
           
          The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program was  
          established by the federal Housing and Community  
          Development Act of 1974 and is administered at the federal  
          level by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban  
          Development (HUD).  The primary objective of the CDBG  
          program is the development of viable urban communities by  
          providing decent housing and a suitable living environment  
          and by expanding economic opportunities for households of  
          low and moderate income.  HUD allocates money directly to  
          large cities and metropolitan areas (CDBG entitlement  
          funds).  

          The state CDBG program, which is administered by the  
          Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD),  
          provides federal funds to cities with a population of less  
          than 50,000 and counties with a population in  
          unincorporated areas of less than 200,000  (CDBG  
          non-entitlement funds).  In order to be eligible for  
          non-entitlement CDBG funds, a nonmetropolitan city or  
          county must submit its housing element to HCD.

          This bill:

          1. Makes legislative findings that there are hundreds of  
             disadvantaged unincorporated communities in the state  
             that may be isolated geographically, surrounded by the  
             city limits of large and medium-sized cities.  Finds  
             that the conditions within these disadvantaged  
             unincorporated communities evidence a distinct lack of  
             public and private investment; present a threat to the  
             health and safety of residents; and foster economic,  
             social, and educational inequality. 

          2. Provides that unless prohibited by federal regulations,  
             local governments must do the following, in  







                                                                SB 194
                                                                Page  
          3

             administering the federal CDBG program: 

             A.    If a local government has a citizen advisory  
                committee (CAC) to advise the city council or board  
                of supervisors on how to spend their CDBG funds, the  
                local government must include representation from  
                disadvantaged unincorporated communities within its  
                jurisdiction; 

             B.    Provide proper notice in compliance with federal  
                law to ensure that residents of disadvantaged  
                unincorporated communities, are given reasonable and  
                timely access to information about the CDBG program,  
                including the application process and technical  
                assistance.

             C.    Prioritize the needs of disadvantaged  
                unincorporated communities within their jurisdiction,  
                if there is no local government board that represents  
                the disadvantaged community, when determining how to  
                spend technical assistance funds.

           Background
           
          The CDBG program provides money to local governments for  
          economic and community development.  Large cities and  
          counties, known as entitlements, receive a direct  
          allocation of CDBG from the federal government.   
          Entitlements are required to follow federal guidelines in  
          administering their portion of CDBG, including establishing  
          a citizen participation plan which must encourage the  
          participation of low- and moderate-income residents.  Small  
          communities, non-entitlements, receive CDBG funds through  
          the State Community Development Block Grant program, which  
          is administered through the Department of Housing and  
          Community Development (HCD). 

           Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)  :  Under existing federal  
          regulations, a grantee must develop and follow a detailed  
          plan which provides for, and encourages, citizen  
          participation and which emphasizes participation by persons  
          of low- or moderate-income, particularly residents of  
          predominantly low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, slum  
          or blighted areas, and areas in which the grantee proposes  







                                                                SB 194
                                                                Page  
          4

          to use CDBG funds.  The plan must:  (1) provide citizens  
          with reasonable and timely access to local meetings,  
          information, and records related to the grantee's proposed  
          and actual use of funds, (2) provide for public hearings to  
          obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and  
          questions at all stages of the community development  
          program, including at least the development of needs, the  
          review of proposed activities, and review of program  
          performance, (3) provide for timely written answers to  
          written complaints and grievances, and (4) identify how the  
          needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in the  
          case of public hearings where a significant number of  
          non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected  
          to participate.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  1/14/09)

          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (source)
          California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
          Center on Race
          Community Water Center
          Dolores Huerta Foundation
          El Comite para el Bienestar de Earlimart
          Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
          Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
          Fresno City Councilmember Henry T. Perea
          Fresno County Supervisor Henry Perea
          Fresno Metro Ministry
          Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc.
          Planning and Conservation League
          Poverty & the Environment
          Seven Trees Coalition

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/26/10)

          Cities of:  Downey, Lakewood, Long Beach, Roseville,  
          Sacramento,
             South San Francisco, and Torrance
          League of California Cities

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the California Rural  







                                                                SB 194
                                                                Page  
          5

          Legal Assistance Foundation, the sponsor of this bill, over  
          one million Californians live in disadvantaged,  
          unincorporated communities.  Residents of these areas often  
          live without the most basic features of safe and healthy  
          environment-services like clean water, sewage lines, storm  
          drains, streetlights, sidewalks, and safe housing.   
          Dependent on county governance for urban needs, these  
          communities are systematically underserved in the overall  
          allocation of public resources and are frequently left out  
          of local planning processes.  This bill will help ensure  
          that all California communities are able to realize their  
          potential as livable, healthy, and economically viable  
          places. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The League of California Cities  
          (League) is opposed to the state conditioning funds that  
          are received directly from the federal government by  
          entitlement communities.  The League believes that "the  
          current economic conditions suggest that now is not the  
          appropriate time to add further conditions to this source  
          of federal funding."  
           

          AGB:CTW:do  8/26/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****