BILL ANALYSIS
SB 211
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SB 211 (Simitian)
As Amended September 4, 2009
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE :31-4
LOCAL GOVERNMENT 5-2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Caballero, Arambula, | | |
| |Davis, | | |
| |De La Torre, Skinner | | |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Knight, Duvall | | |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Authorizes the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors
(County Supervisors) to initiate the formation of a regional
park and open-space district (district) with boundaries that are
coterminous with Santa Cruz County (County), except for
specified territory and prescribes specific requirements for
said district. Specifically, this bill :
1)Authorizes the County Supervisors to initiate the formation of
the district with boundaries that are coterminous with the
County, except for territory within the Midpeninsula Regional
Open Space District.
2)Authorizes the County Supervisors to hold a public hearing,
adopt a resolution, and call the election in lieu of the usual
petitions and local agency formation commission (LAFCO)
hearings and decisions.
3)Requires the County Supervisor's resolution to do all of the
following:
a) Name the proposed district and state the reasons for
forming it;
b) Describe the methods by which the district will be
financed;
SB 211
Page 2
c) Specify that the proposed district shall be governed by
a board of seven directors (board) representing divisions
of equal population;
d) Specify that the proposed district shall not have, and
may not exercise, the power of eminent domain unless
requested by the owner of the land;
e) Call the formation election; and,
f) Include any other matters necessary to the formation of
the district.
4)Specifies that the formation of the district is not subject to
LAFCO formation proceedings.
5)Requires the district to establish a citizen advisory
committee (committee) to provide broad-based citizen input
into the operation of the district, and advice and
recommendations on certain policy and program questions and
issues, including expenditure plans and acquisition programs.
6)Requires the committee to render advice and make
recommendations to the board on those matters.
7)Specifies that the committee shall be composed of nine members
as follows:
a) One supervisor appointed by the board of supervisors of
the County, or his or her designee;
b) One city council member representing each city in the
County appointed by the city council of the city
represented, or his or her designee;
c) One member representing the district's agricultural
interests appointed by the board;
d) One member representing the district's environmental
community appointed by the board;
e) One member representing the district's real estate
interests appointed by the board; and,
f) One member representing the district's business
SB 211
Page 3
community appointed by the board.
8)States that prior to the appointment of the committee members
representing the community's agricultural, environmental, real
estate, or business interests, the board shall solicit from
the community three or more nominations for each of those
positions.
9)Specifies that the nomination for the member of the citizen
advisory committee representing the district's agricultural
interest shall be made by the county farm bureau consistent
with any procedures that may be established by the board.
10)Specifies that two members of the member of the citizen
advisory committee representing the district's agricultural,
environmental, real estate, and business interest shall be
from southern Santa Cruz County and two shall be from northern
Santa Cruz County, as defined.
11)Requires the board to respond, in writing, to approved
committee recommendations on matters relating to expenditure
plans and acquisition programs.
12)Requires the board, before acting upon a proposed action
relating to expenditure plans and acquisition programs, to
consider recommendations from the committee and respond in
writing to the committee recommendations.
13)Requires the board to adopt rules of procedure for the
committee and establish responsibilities for the committee and
its members.
14)Requires the committee to conduct its meetings in accordance
with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
15)Specifies that the members of the committee are subject to
the Political Reform Act.
16)States that a quorum shall consist of seven members of the
committee.
17)Specifies that an action shall not be taken without the
concurrence of at least a majority of the total committee
membership.
SB 211
Page 4
18)Specifies that acquisition by the district of property within
the 25-year urban growth area boundary established by Measure
U, known as the Orderly Growth and Agricultural Protection
Initiative, as approved by the voters in the November 5, 2002,
general election, is subject to approval by the City Council
of the City of Watsonville.
19)States that not later than 60 days after receiving a
notification of intent by the board to acquire specified
property within the Measure U urban growth area boundary, the
Watsonville City Council shall determine whether to approve
acquisition of that property by the district.
20)Provides that if a written determination is not made by the
Watsonville City Council within 60 days of receiving
notification by the board, and the notification includes a
statement that it is a notification of intent by the board to
acquire property within the urban growth boundary, the
acquisition shall be deemed approved by the Watsonville City
Council.
21)Adds findings and declarations regarding the community effort
in the creation of a 25-year urban growth area for the City of
Watsonville established under Measure U and the need to allow
the City of Watsonville to approve any land purchase in that
area.
22)Adds legislative intent language regarding the need for a
county wide open space district in Santa Cruz County.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Authorizes the formation of an open-space district by a
petition requesting the creation and maintenance of an
open-space district, describing the exterior boundaries,
signed by at least 5,000 electors residing within the
territory proposed to be included in the open-space district,
and presented to the board of supervisors of the county
containing the largest area within the proposed district.
2)Authorizes proceedings for the formation of a regional park
district, regional park and open-space district, or regional
open-space district in specified counties of the state to be
initiated by resolution of the county board of supervisors
SB 211
Page 5
adopted after a noticed hearing, and specifies the contents of
the resolution, in lieu of the petition and related
proceedings required under the above provisions.
3)Allows regional park and open-space districts to sell bonds to
acquire property by purchase or eminent domain.
4)Authorizes regional park and open-space districts to use the
following types of funding mechanisms:
a) General obligation bonds paid for by higher property tax
rates that require a two-thirds voter approval;
b) Mello-Roos Act bonds paid for by special taxes (parcel
taxes) that require a two-thirds voter approval; and,
c) Assessment bonds paid for by benefit assessments that
require the property owners' approval with
weighted-ballots.
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS : In Santa Cruz County, four independent recreation and
park districts and a county-run county service area provide park
services in the unincorporated communities outside the County's
four cities. Although mostly in San Mateo and Santa Clara
counties, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District also
overlaps a small corner of Santa Cruz County. Open space
advocates in Santa Cruz County want to form a countywide
regional open-space district with a directly-elected board of
directors. Looking to the statutory precedents created for
other counties, they want permission to expedite the proposed
district's formation.
The Legislature has delegated its inherent power to control
local boundaries to the 58 LAFCOs; directing the LAFCOs to
discourage urban sprawl, preserve open space and agricultural
lands, provide efficient government services, and encourage
orderly government while considering local conditions and
circumstances. The Legislature has waived LAFCOs' control over
some districts' boundaries, particularly when they are
coterminous with the boundaries of a single county. SB 211
exempts the formation of the proposed Santa Cruz regional
open-space district from LAFCO's review. However, the proposed
district would not be coterminous with the County's boundaries
SB 211
Page 6
because the bill slices off the 765 acres that are already
within the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District's
boundaries. The Midpeninsula District also owns the 800-acre
Loma Prieta Ranch in Santa Cruz County, although that property
is not yet within the District's existing boundaries. These
detailed boundary questions may deserve the Santa Cruz LAFCO's
careful review. The Legislature may wish to ask why there is a
need to circumvent the LAFCO process. The Legislature may wish
to consider that if the district's formation is not going to go
through the full LAFCO process, perhaps it should require the
Santa Cruz LAFCO to hold at least one public hearing on the
issue prior to taking the formation proceedings to the voters.
The regional park and open-space district law is the principal
act for agencies such as the East Bay Regional Parks District
and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. Starting in
1972, 10 special bills have allowed county supervisors to start
formation proceedings for regional open-space districts without
the sponsors having to gather more than 5,000 signatures on
petitions: Los Angeles - SB 659 (Hill, 1991); Marin - AB 2353
(Bagley, 1972); Napa -
SB 1306 (Thompson,1992); Riverside - SB 486 (Berge son, 1989);
Sacramento - SB 779 (Johnston, 1993); San Bernardino - AB 775
(Eaves, 1990); Santa Barbara - AB 1613 (Lempert, 2000); Sonoma -
AB 3630 (Filante, 1990); and, Ventura - AB 1145 (Jackson, 2002).
However, even after getting authorization, five of these
districts were never actually formed at the local level.
In May 1998, members of the Pajaro Valley community (which is in
South Santa Cruz County) came together to begin a visioning
process about the future of the valley. This broad-based group
of residents, business, agricultural, environmental, and
government agency representatives created the non-profit group,
Action Pajaro Valley, in 1999. The group developed a
constructive collaborative process for planning and creating a
positive future for all residents of the Pajaro Valley. One
result of this process is a growth management strategy, which
incorporates a unified set of land use policies for the Pajaro
Valley as a consolidated ecological region. These areas include
the City of Watsonville, Green Valley Area, and the Town of
Pajaro. These policies balance the valley's economic interests,
environmental resources, and socioeconomic needs for the next
20-30 years. In the November 2002 election, City of Watsonville
residents passed Measure U, also known as the Orderly Growth and
Agricultural Protection Initiative. This ballot initiative
SB 211
Page 7
established an Urban Growth Area for the City of Watsonville
intending to: preserve Pajaro Valley farmland, create an urban
growth boundary that the City of Watsonville can grow into over
the next 20-25 years, protect the local environment, supply new
jobs in the City of Watsonville, and provide the opportunity for
new housing units. Consistent with the vision of Measure U and
the citizens of Pajaro Valley, this bill requires that if the
district proposes to purchase any open-space land within the
25-year growth boundary established by Measure U then the City
of Watsonville must approve this action.
In keeping with the spirit of a community wide planning process,
this bill establishes a citizen advisory committee to provide
broad-based citizen input into the operation of the district,
and advice and recommendations on certain policy and program
questions and issues, including expenditure plans and
acquisition programs. This committee will be made up of a
council member from each city in the county, one supervisor from
the board of supervisors, and individuals representing the
community's agricultural, environmental, real estate, and
business interest.
Analysis Prepared by : Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916)
319-3958
FN:
0002896