BILL ANALYSIS
SB 228
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 4, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 228 (DeSaulnier) - As Amended: June 21, 2010
Policy Committee: Natural
ResourcesVote:7-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
As amended, this bill requires compostable plastic bag
manufacturers, effective July 1, 2011, to ensure that such bags
are readily identifiable and distinguishable from other plastic
bags by specified visual indicators, so long as such indicators
do not violate Federal Trade Commission requirements.
FISCAL EFFECT
No state costs.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author notes the increased use of compostable
plastic bags, which can be collected along with other organic
waste for composting. Yet, the author continues, there is
nothing to distinguish such bags from conventional,
nonbiodegradable plastic bags. This is problematic, the
author claims, because consumers mistakenly place conventional
plastic bags in compost collection bins, which, because they
are nonbiodegradable, contaminate the compost material. The
result, the author contends, is higher composting costs. The
author concludes that the labeling specifications required by
this bill will allow consumers to readily distinguish between
compostable plastic bags and conventional plastic bags and
then to properly dispose of each type of bag.
2)Calrecycle-Why Say What It Is If We Don't Say What It Does ?
Previous versions of this bill required a compostable plastic
bag manufacturer to submit an annual report to Calrecycle that
demonstrate third-party certification of a bag's
SB 228
Page 2
compostability. Recent amendments to the bill struck this
reporting requirement, thereby eliminating Calrecycle's
responsibility under the bill. The bill continues, however,
to define "department" to mean Calrecycle, despite the lack of
departmental responsibility in the bill.
The committee should delete the bill's reference to
Calrecycle.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081