BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 248
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 248 (Oropeza)
          As Amended  August 31, 2009
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :25-12  
          
           EDUCATION           7-3         HIGHER EDUCATION    7-1         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Brownley, Arambula,       |Ayes:|Portantino, Block, Fong,  |
          |     |Buchanan, Carter, Eng,    |     |Galgiani, Huber, Ma,      |
          |     |Solorio, Torlakson        |     |Ruskin                    |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Nestande, Garrick, Miller |Nays:|Cook                      |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
            
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano,         |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Davis,                    |     |                          |
          |     |Fuentes, Hall, John A.    |     |                          |
          |     |Perez,                    |     |                          |
          |     |Skinner, Solorio,         |     |                          |
          |     |Torlakson, Hill           |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen,                  |     |                          |
          |     |Audra Strickland          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Requires school districts to post the list of rights  
          extended to pupils under Title IX on the district website;  
          requires community colleges and campuses of the California State  
          University (CSU) to post the list of rights extended to pupils  
          under Title IX in the athletic sport section of the campus Web  
          site; and, requests the chancellor of each campus of the  
          University of California (UC) to post the list of rights  
          extended to pupils under Title IX in the athletic sport section  








                                                                  SB 248
                                                                  Page  2


          of the campus Web site.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Requires, by July 1, 2010, a school district to place on its  
            website a list of rights extended to students under Title IX.   


          2)Requires, by July 1, 2010, the president or chief executive  
            officer of a California Community College (CCC) campus, and  
            the president of a campus of CSU to place in the athletic  
            sport section of the campus Web site a list of rights extended  
            to students under Title IX.

          3)Requests, by July 1, 2010, the chancellor of each campus of  
            the UC to place in the athletic sport section of the campus  
            Web site a list of rights extended to students under Title IX.

          4)Requires that a list of these rights be posted in no less than  
            12-point boldface type, and the bottom of each page is to  
            contain the name and contact information for the gender equity  
            coordinator of the school district, college or university.

           EXISTING FEDERAL LAW  provides that, in part, no person in the  
          United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from  
          participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to  
          discrimination under any educational program of activity  
          receiving federal financial assistance.  In order to be in  
          compliance with federal Title IX, a school must show compliance  
          with one of the three tests.  The federal tests are:  1)  
          athletic participation of women and girls is proportionate to  
          enrollment; 2) the school has a history and continuing practice  
          of program expansion for women or girls; and, 3) the school is  
          fully meeting female athletes' interests and abilities in its  
          present athletic program.  (Title IX of the Education Amendments  
          of 1972 to the 1964 Civil Rights Act) 

           EXISTING STATE LAW  establishes standards substantially similar  
          to those of Federal Title IX; and, requires the California  
          Department of Education (CDE) to post on its Web site, by July  
          1, 2006, in both English and Spanish, information regarding the  
          federal regulations implementing Title IX.  (Education Code 230,  
          270, 271 and Article 4 commencing with 66271.5) 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, total annual minor absorbable General Fund and  








                                                                  SB 248
                                                                  Page  3


          General Fund/Proposition 98 costs, likely less than $100,000, to  
          educational entities to complete the requirements of this  
          measure.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, nearly 40 years since the  
          passage of Title IX, there is still ample room for improvement  
          in increasing access to athletic programs.  Lack of readily  
          available information on key provisions of Title IX for students  
          and parents make compliance more difficult.  Lack of awareness  
          is often a direct result of Title IX non-compliance.  

          By codifying federal standards relative to gender equity in  
          school athletics, this bill ensures that Title IX provisions  
          would continue to be law in California even if the federal  
          provisions are amended or repealed.

          More than Athletics:  Title IX applies to all aspects of  
          educational opportunities, not just athletics, and covers staff  
          as well.  This bill is focused primarily on athletics, as it  
          requires the list of rights be posted in the athletic sport  
          section of the college or university campus Web site.  The  
          Assembly should consider whether it might also be appropriate to  
          require the list of rights to be posted in a general location on  
          the campus Web site or be published in course catalogs.

          Previous Legislation:  AB 322 (Oropeza) Chapter 386, Statutes of  
          2005, required the CDE to post on its Web site, by July 1, 2006,  
          in both English and Spanish, information in the federal  
          regulations implementing Title IX.  CDE is authorized to use a  
          list of specific rights that are based on Title IX regulations  
          as a source for the information for the Web site.  

          AB 2240 (Oropeza) from 2004 would have established the Athletic  
          Bill of Rights to make high schools students and parents of high  
          school students aware of their rights under Title IX in regard  
          to athletic programs at public high schools and specified that a  
          poster be printed and posted in school athletic facilities to  
          make students aware of these rights.  The bill was vetoed by the  
          Governor with the following veto message:   
               The Federal Title IX requirements that are intended to  
               ban sex discrimination in school academics and  
               athletics have provided a worthy benefit to improving  
               equity in athletics for women and men.  However,  
               establishing an additional Equity in Athletics Bill of  








                                                                  SB 248
                                                                  Page  4


               Rights is generally duplicative and unnecessary.  
               Instead, the Legislature could approve a bill  
               requiring the posting of existing Title IX  
               requirements, on school campuses and on the California  
               Department of Education website, to help promote  
               greater student and parental awareness of athletic  
               equity issues in California schools.

          AB 833 (Steinberg), Chapter 660, Statutes of 2003, established  
          state standards substantially similar to those of Federal Title  
          IX.


           Analysis Prepared by :    Chelsea Kelley / ED. / (916) 319-2087 


                                                                FN: 0002591