BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 248|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 248
          Author:   Oropeza (D), et al
          Amended:  8/31/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  8-1, 4/22/09
          AYES:  Romero, Alquist, Hancock, Liu, Maldonado, Padilla,  
            Simitian, Wyland
          NOES:  Huff

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-4, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza,  
            Wyland, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Denham, Runner, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR  :  25-12, 6/1/09
          AYES: Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, Correa,  
            DeSaulnier, Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal,  
            Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Romero, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Wiggins, Wolk,  
            Wright, Yee
          NOES: Aanestad, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Cox, Denham,  
            Dutton, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Runner, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Ducheny, Wyland

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  54-21, 9/3/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Educational equity:  Title IX

           SOURCE  :     Author
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 248
                                                                Page  
          2



           DIGEST  :    This bill requires school districts, community  
          colleges, and campuses of the California State University  
          (CSU) to post the list of rights afforded to pupils under  
          Title IX on the district or campus website.  This bill also  
          requests compliance on the part of the University of  
          California (UC).  It also requests the chancellor of the  
          University of California to place the list of rights at the  
          entrance to the universities gymnasiums and in the locker  
          rooms.

           Assembly Amendments  deleted Senate language requiring the  
          president of a CSU campus to post the list of rights at the  
          entrance to the University gymnasium and in locker rooms  
          and requesting the Chancellor of each UC campus to post  
          them in the university gymnasiums and locker rooms. 

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing federal law - now called the Patsy T.  
          Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act, after the late  
          Hawaiian Congresswoman - (Title IX of the Education  
          Amendments of 1972 to the 1964 Civil Rights Act) provides  
          that, in part, "no person in the United States shall, on  
          the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be  
          denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination  
          under any educational program of activity receiving Federal  
          financial assistance."  In order to be in compliance with  
          Federal Title IX, a school must show compliance with one of  
          these three parts.  The federal tests are:  (1) athletic  
          participation of women and girls is proportionate to  
          enrollment, (2) the school has a history and continuing  
          practice of program expansion for women or girls, and (3)  
          the school is fully meeting female athletes' interests and  
          abilities in its present athletic program. 

          Existing state law (AB 833, Steinberg, Chapter 660,  
          Statutes of 2003) establishes standards virtually identical  
          to those of Federal Title IX, with one modification:  in  
          Test 2, "history" is defined to mean the past two years.   
          Existing law (AB 322, Oropeza, Chapter 386, Statutes of  
          2005) requires the California Department of Education (CDE)  
          to post on its website, by July 1, 2006, in both English  
          and Spanish, information in the federal regulations  
          implementing Title IX.  The CDE is authorized to use a list  







                                                                SB 248
                                                                Page  
          3

          of specific rights that are based on Title IX regulations  
          as a source for the information for the website.  

          Title IX applies to all aspects of educational  
          opportunities, not just athletics.

          This bill:

          1.Requires, by July 1, 2010, a school district to place on  
            its website a list of rights extended to students under  
            Title IX. 

          2.Requires, by July 1, 2010, the president or chief  
            executive officer of a California Community College  
            campus, and the president of a campus of CSU to place in  
            the athletic sport section of the campus Web site a list  
            of rights extended to students under Title IX. 

          3.Requests, by July 1, 2010, the chancellor of each campus  
            of the UC to place in the athletic sport section of the  
            campus Web site a list of rights extended to students  
            under Title IX. 

          4.Requires that a list of these rights be posted in no less  
            than 12-point boldface type, and the bottom of each page  
            is to contain the name and contact information for the  
            gender equity coordinator of the school district, college  
            or university. 

           Related legislation  

          SB 195 (Florez), 2009, expands the information that must be  
          included in the assurance of compliance with Title IX  
          currently provided by postsecondary educational  
          institutions to the Student Aid Commission, and adds a  
          $50,000 civil penalty for knowingly providing false  
          information.  It is in the Senate Appropriations Committee.

           FISCAL EFFECT :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          This bill imposes a reimbursable mandate on K-12 and  
          community college districts.  There are over 2,500 junior  
          high and high school sites in the state and 110 community  







                                                                SB 248
                                                                Page  
          4

          college campuses.  Assuming $100 to $200 per campus/school  
          site for costs associated with compliance with the bill  
          (staff time, costs of posting, printing, etc.), costs for  
          this mandate would range between $250,000 and $500,000, one  
          time.  As state entities, UC and CSU are not eligible to  
          claim mandate reimbursement from the state, though K-12 and  
          community college districts are.  

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/4/09)

          American Civil Liberties Union
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and  
          Dance
          California Athletic Trainers Association
          California Commission on the Status of Women
          California Interscholastic Federation
          California Teachers Association 
          City of Carson


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, nearly 40  
          years since the passage of Title IX, there is still ample  
          room for improvement in increasing access to athletic  
          programs. Lack of readily available information on key  
          provisions of Title IX for students and parents make  
          compliance more difficult. Lack of awareness is often a  
          direct result of Title IX non-compliance. 

          By codifying federal standards relative to gender equity in  
          school athletics, this bill ensures that Title IX  
          provisions would continue to be law in California even if  
          the federal provisions are amended or repealed. 

          More than Athletics: Title IX applies to all aspects of  
          educational opportunities, not just athletics, and covers  
          staff as well. This bill is focused primarily on athletics,  
          as it requires the list of rights be posted in the athletic  
          sport section of the college or university campus Web site.  
          The Assembly should consider whether it might also be  
          appropriate to require the list of rights to be posted in a  
          general location on the campus Web site or be published in  
          course catalogs.







                                                                SB 248
                                                                Page  
          5



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES: Arambula, Beall, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Coto, De La Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, Eng,  
            Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani,  
            Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman,  
            Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza,  
            Monning, Nava, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner,  
            Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico,  
            Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NOES: Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Conway, Cook, Duvall, Fuller, Gaines, Gilmore, Hagman,  
            Harkey, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Nestande,  
            Niello, Nielsen, Audra Strickland, Tran
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Ammiano, Davis, DeVore, Garrick, Vacancy


          DLW:nl  9/4/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****