BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                         SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                              Gloria Romero, Chair
                           2009-2010 Regular Session
                                        

          BILL NO:       SB 252
          AUTHOR:        Denham
          INTRODUCED:    February 24, 2009
          FISCAL COMM:   No             HEARING DATE:  April 1, 2009
          URGENCY:       No             CONSULTANT:Kathleen Chavira

           NOTE  :  This bill has been requested by the Senate  
          Appropriations Committee.  A do pass motion should include  
          a referral to the Senate Rules Committee for consideration  
          of the referral request of the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee.  
           
          SUBJECT  :  Deferred Maintenance Funding
          
           SUMMARY  

          This bill expands the uses of deferred maintenance funding  
          to include the use of these funds for internal connections  
          for education technology wiring.  

           BACKGROUND  

          Current law authorizes the governing board of a school  
          district to establish a restricted deferred maintenance  
          fund, and provides for the deposit of prescribed local  
          funds, and for the deposit of matching state funds. Current  
          law also requires the State Allocation Board (SAB) to  
          apportion to school districts the state matching funds for  
          deferred maintenance. 

          Under the School Facility Program (SFP), administered by  
          the SAB, local education agencies are eligible to receive  
          per-pupil grants from state education bond funds for  
          construction or modernization of schools.  Applications for  
          new construction are submitted on a district-wide or High  
          School Attendance Area basis, while applications for  
          modernization are submitted on a site by site basis. 

          To be eligible for modernization funding, a permanent  
          building must be at least 25-years old and a relocatable  
          building must be at least 20-years old. Projects eligible  




                                                                SB 252
                                                                Page 2



          under modernization include such modifications as air  
          conditioning, plumbing, lighting, and electrical systems  
          and eligible project costs include funding for, among other  
          things, design, education technology, and  
          furniture/equipment.
           






          ANALYSIS
           
           This bill  :

          1)   Expands the purposes for which deferred maintenance  
               funding may be used.  Specifically, it defines  
               "electrical" for the purposes of allowable uses for  
               deferred maintenance funding to:

                    a)             Include internal connections for  
                    education technology wiring.

                    b)             Include components necessary to  
                    transmit information to school buildings, as  
                    specified.

                    c)             Exclude services that extend  
                    beyond the school campus or library branch.

          2)   Makes technical and conforming changes.

           STAFF COMMENTS  

           1)   Is this bill necessary  ?  SBX3 4 (Ducheny, Chapter 12,  
               Statutes of 2009) allows full funding flexibility for  
               a number of K-12 education programs, including  
               deferred maintenance and provides that such  
               flexibility shall be provided for the next five fiscal  
               years.  It appears that districts currently have the  
               flexibility and discretion to use these funds for the  
               purpose of internal connectivity.  In light of  
               changing technology and the potential for additional  
               state, federal or even private sources of funding in  
               the future, would it be more prudent to consider such  




                                                                SB 252
                                                                Page 3



               a change once the flexibility provisions provided for  
               in the current budget agreement are inoperative? 

           2)   Current program  . Funding for the Deferred Maintenance  
               Program comes primarily from the Budget Act  
               (proposition 98 funding), but also includes excess  
               repayments from the former State School Building Aid  
               Program, and State School Site Utilization funds. The  
               SAB annually apportions funds for this program for the  
               purpose of providing assistance to school districts  
               for major repair or replacement of existing school  
               building components.  According to the Office of  
               Public School Construction, while electrical expenses  
               are currently eligible for deferred maintenance  
               funding, the internal connections authorized by this  
               bill would not be an eligible expense as they would be  
               viewed as an upgrade, versus repair work.  

           3)   Fiscal impact  .   As noted in comment #1, deferred  
               maintenance funding is provided from the General Fund.  
                This bill would authorize the use of these funds for  
               purposes not currently considered eligible expenses.   
               Although Legislative Counsel has identified this bill  
               as non-fiscal, to the extent that the bill expands the  
               use of current funds for new purposes, this bill would  
               create pressure on the state General Fund to support  
               these expanded activities.

           4)   Other sources for this purpose  . The Schools and  
               Libraries Program of the Universal Service Fund,  
               commonly known as "E-Rate," is administered by the  
               Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) under  
               the direction of the Federal Communications Commission  
               (FCC), and provides discounts to assist most schools  
               and libraries in the United States to obtain  
               affordable telecommunications and Internet access.  
               This program is funded through a Universal Service fee  
               charged to companies that provide interstate and/or  
               international telecommunications services. Funding can  
               be requested for telecommunications services, Internet  
               access, internal connections, and basic maintenance of  
               internal connections. Discounts for support depend on  
               the level of poverty and the urban/rural status of the  
               population served and range from 20% to 90% of the  
               costs of eligible services. According to the  
               California Department of Education, in 2007-08, $228  




                                                                SB 252
                                                                Page 4



               million for internal connections was approved for 196  
               primarily high poverty school districts (approximately  
               19% of the total number of districts). Generally, only  
               86% of the actual costs to these districts were  
               covered by the program.  

               In addition, the electrical "upgrades" described by  
               this bill would be considered eligible expenditures  
               under the School Facility Program modernization or new  
               construction programs.  Staff notes that eligibility  
               for modernization funding would require that a  
               permanent building must be at least 25-years old and a  
               relocatable building must be at least 20-years old.

           SUPPORT  

          Central Valley Education Coalition

           OPPOSITION

           None received.