BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                             SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
                           Senator Ellen M. Corbett, Chair
                              2009-2010 Regular Session


          SB 306                                                      
          Senator Calderon                                            
          As Introduced
          Hearing Date: April 14, 2009                                
          Civil Code; Financial Code                                  
          BCP:jd                                                      
                                                                      

                                        SUBJECT
                                           
                             Real Property Transactions

                                      DESCRIPTION  

          This bill would enact three separate provisions relating to real  
          property transactions.  Specifically, this bill would:
           enact technical and clarifying changes to SB 1137 (Perata,  
            Corbett, Machado, Chapter 69, Statutes of 2008), which  
            required, among other things, that a lender or servicer  
            contact a borrower at least 30 days prior to filing a Notice  
            of Default (the first step in the non-judicial foreclosure  
            process), and that tenants receive notice that their rental  
            property is in foreclosure;
           establish a minimum time period in which a payoff demand  
            statement must be valid, create a short-pay demand agreement;  
            and
           clarify the coverage of the Escrow Agents' Fidelity  
            Corporation.  

                                      BACKGROUND  

          Foreclosures in California are generally non-judicial, meaning  
          that they are accomplished without court involvement.  The first  
          step in the foreclosure process is the filing of a Notice of  
          Default, which generally occurs after three or more months of  
          delinquency.  The foreclosing entity must then wait at least  
          three months before noticing the sale of the property, which  
          must be posted at least 20 days before the date of sale.  In an  
          effort to help those for whom foreclosure may be avoided, the  
          Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, SB 1137 (Perata,  
          Corbett, Machado).  
                                                                (more)



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 2 of ?




          That urgency bill sought to increase protections for both  
          borrowers and tenants in the foreclosure process by requiring,  
          among other things: (1) contact prior to the filing of a notice  
          of default; (2) allowing a borrower to designate a HUD-certified  
          housing counseling agency to discuss options, on their behalf,  
          to avoid foreclosure; and (3) mailing of a notice that informs  
          tenants that their rental property is in foreclosure, as  
          specified.  The first portion of this bill, sponsored by the  
          United Trustees Association, seeks to enact clarifying changes  
          to those provisions.

          The remaining sections of this bill would establish a minimum  
          time period in which a payoff demand statement must be valid,  
          create a short-pay demand agreement, and exempt specified real  
          property escrows from coverage by the Escrow Agents' Fidelity  
          Corporation.  Those provisions are sponsored by the California  
          Escrow Association and the Escrow Agents Fidelity Corporation,  
          respectively.

          The provisions of this bill were approved by the Senate  
          Committee on Banking, Finance and Insurance on April 1, 2009.

                                CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW
           
          1.    Existing law  regulates the non-judicial foreclosure of  
            properties pursuant to the power of sale contained within a  
            mortgage contract.  To commence the process, existing state  
            law requires the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary to record  
            a Notice of Default and allow three months to lapse before  
            setting a date for sale of the property. (Civ. Code Secs.  
            2924, 2924f.)

             Existing law  prohibits a mortgagee, trustee, or authorized  
            agent from filing a notice of default until 30 days after  
            contact is made, as specified.  That notice of default must  
            include a declaration that the mortgagee, beneficiary, or  
            authorized agent has contacted the borrower, tried with due  
            diligence to contact the borrower, or the borrower has  
            surrendered the property, as specified.  (Civ. Code Sec.  
            2923.5 (a), (b).)

             Existing law  allows a borrower to designate a HUD-certified  
            housing counseling agency, attorney, or other advisor to  
            discuss with the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent,  
            on the borrower's behalf, options to avoid foreclosure. (Civ.  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 3 of ?



            Code Sec. 2923.5 (f).)

             Existing law  provides that the above requirements relating to  
            contact do not apply in various circumstances, including where  
            the borrower has filed for bankruptcy and the proceedings have  
            not been finalized.  Existing law further limits the contact  
            requirements to loans made between January 1, 2003 and  
            December 31, 2007 that are secured by residential real  
            property and are for owner-occupied residences, as defined.   
            (Civ. Code Sec. 2923.5 (h), (i).)

             This bill  would revise the above provisions by:
                     clarifying that the 30-day time period ends 30 days  
                 after initial contact; 
                 clarifying that the declaration requirement does not  
               apply if the borrower has surrendered the property,  
               contracted with an organization that advises people on how  
               to avoid their obligations, or filed for bankruptcy, as  
               specified;
                 defining "borrower" as a natural person or persons who  
               are original signators to a note or other obligation  
               secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on a residence, as  
               specified;
                 requiring a borrower's designation of a HUD-certified  
               housing counseling agency to be in writing;
                 clarifying that the bankruptcy exemption applies if a  
               case has been filed under Chapter 7, 11, 12 or 13 of Title  
               11 of the United States Code and the bankruptcy court has  
               not entered an order closing or dismissing the case, or  
               granting relief from a stay of foreclosure;
                 limiting the application of the contact requirement to  
               residential owner-occupied residences containing no more  
               than four dwelling units;
                 defining "owner-occupied" as the principal residence of  
               the borrower as indicated to the lender in loan documents; 
                 providing that the contact requirements apply to  
               mortgages or deeds of trust recorded from January 1, 2003  
               to December 31, 2007; and
                     other technical, clarifying changes. 

          2.    Existing law  states that the Legislature finds and declares  
            that any duty servicers may have to maximize net present value  
            under their pooling and servicing agreements is owed to all  
            parties in a loan pool, not to any particular parties, and  
            that a servicer acts in the best interests of all parties if  
            it agrees to or implements a loan modification or workout if:  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 4 of ?



            (1) the loan is in default or default is reasonably  
            foreseeable; and (2) anticipated recovery under the loan  
            modification or workout plan exceeds anticipated recovery  
            through foreclosure on a net present value basis.  (Civ. Code  
            Sec. 2923.6.)

             This bill  would revise the above finding and declaration by  
            additionally referring to investors under a pooling and  
            servicing agreement. 

          3.    Existing law  requires a trustee or authorized agent, upon  
            posting a notice of sale, to also post, and mail, a statutory  
            notice informing tenants that they are the resident of a  
            property subject to a foreclosure sale.  (Civ. Code Sec.  
            2924.8.)

             This bill  would clarify that the statutory notice shall,  
            concurrently with the mailing of the notice of sale, be sent  
            by first-class mail.

          4.    Existing law  provides rules by which an entitled person, as  
            defined, may request a payoff demand statement in connection  
            with a mortgage or deed of trust, and defines a payoff demand  
            statement as a written demand made by an entitled person or  
            authorized agent, setting forth the amounts required as of the  
            date of preparation by the beneficiary (generally, the  
            lender), to fully satisfy all obligations secured by the loan  
            that is the subject of the payoff demand statement.  (Civ.  
            Code Sec. 2943.)  
           
             Existing law  further requires the following in connection with  
            a payoff demand statement: (1) the statement must include  
            information reasonably necessary to calculate the payoff  
            amount on a per diem basis for the period of time, not to  
            exceed 30 days, during which the per diem amount is not  
            changed by the terms of the note; (2) the beneficiary or his  
            or her authorized agent must prepare and deliver the payoff  
            demand statement to the entitled person within 21 days of  
            receiving the demand for it.  If the loan is subject to a  
            recorded notice of default (NOD) or a filed complaint  
            commencing a judicial foreclosure, the beneficiary is under no  
            obligation to prepare and deliver a payoff demand statement,  
            unless the written demand for the statement is received prior  
            to the first publication of a notice of sale, or the notice of  
            the first date of sale established by a court.  (Civ. Code  
            Sec. 2943.)  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 5 of ?




             This bill  would establish a minimum period of time that a  
            payoff demand statement must be valid, as the lesser of: (1)  
            ten days from the date of preparation by the beneficiary; or  
            (2) the number of days from the date of preparation by the  
            beneficiary until the terms of the note result in a change in  
            the per diem amount.

             This bill  would define a "short-pay agreement" as an  
            agreement, in writing, in which the beneficiary agrees to  
            release its lien on a property in return for payment of any  
            amount less than the secured obligation.

             This bill  would define a "short-pay demand statement" as a  
            written agreement, conditioned on the existence of a short-pay  
            agreement, that is prepared in response to a written demand  
            made by an entitled person or an authorized agent, setting  
            forth an amount less than the outstanding debt, together with  
            any terms and conditions, under which the beneficiary will  
            execute and deliver a reconveyance of the deed of trust  
            securing the note that is the subject of the short-pay demand  
            statement.  This bill would provide that a short-pay demand  
            statement shall be valid for the same length of time as the  
            payoff demand statement described above.

             This bill  would require a beneficiary, or his or her  
            authorized agent to provide a short-pay demand statement to an  
            entitled person or his or her authorized agent within 21 days  
            of receiving a demand for the statement from the entitled  
            person or his or her agent, but would provide that if a  
            beneficiary or his or her authorized agent elects not to  
            proceed with the short-sale transaction, he or she is not  
            required to provide a short-pay demand statement, within 21  
            days of receiving the demand for the short-pay demand  
            statement.  This bill would further provide that if the terms  
            and conditions of the short-pay agreement require approval by  
            the beneficiary of a closing statement or similar document  
            prepared by the escrow holder, approval or disapproval must be  
            provided no more than four days after the beneficiary receives  
            the closing statement, except as specified.

          5.    Existing law  defines an exchange facilitator (EF), and  
            requires EFs doing business in California to meet specified  
            financial criteria and comply with specified requirements  
            related to their custodianship of money and property involved  
            in Section 1031 real property exchanges; and establishes  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 6 of ?



            specified prohibitions which apply to EFs doing business in  
            California. (Fin. Code Sec. 51000 et seq.)
             Existing law  establishes the Escrow Agents' Fidelity  
            Corporation (EAFC) to provide fidelity coverage to escrow  
            agents, as specified, and requires each person licensed under  
            the Escrow Law, who is engaged in the business of receiving  
            specified types of escrows within California, to participate  
            as a member in EAFC.  (Fin. Code Secs. 17312, 17314.)
             
            This bill  would explicitly exempt money or property held by or  
            deposited with a person acting as an EF from real property  
            escrows for which EAFC is required to provide fidelity  
            coverage.

                                        COMMENT
           
          1.    Stated need for the bill 

          The provisions of this bill are co-sponsored by the United  
          Trustees Association (UTA), the California Escrow Association  
          (CEA), and the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation (EAFC).  

          The UTA, sponsor of Sections 1 through 3, states that those  
          Sections are intended to clarify ambiguities in SB 1137 to avoid  
          unnecessary confusion and potential litigation.  The CEA,  
          sponsor of Section 4, notes that that Section proposes technical  
          changes to payoff demand statements under existing law, and  
          creates a "short-pay demand statement" for use in short sales of  
          real estate. Finally, the EAFC, sponsor of Section 5, states  
          that this bill is intended to clarify an ambiguity under  
          existing law regarding EAFC coverage of "exchanges."

          2.    Clarifying changes to SB 1137 (Perata, Corbett, Machado)  

          In response to the unprecedented threat to the state and local  
          economies as a result of skyrocketing residential property  
          foreclosure rates in California, the Legislature enacted, and  
          the Governor signed, SB 1137, an urgency bill that was chaptered  
          on July 8, 2008.  This bill seeks to "clean-up" various  
          provisions of SB 1137 in order to provide clarity to the  
          lenders, servicers, and trustees who must comply with its  
          requirements.

            a.    Declaration regarding contact  

            In order to facilitate communication between all parties, SB  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 7 of ?



            1137 required a lender or servicer to contact a delinquent  
            borrower at least 30 days prior to filing a Notice of Default  
            on their property.  To provide an affirmation of the steps  
            taken to comply with that requirement, SB 1137 required a  
            declaration to be included in the Notice of Default that the  
            borrower was contacted, due diligence efforts were taken to  
            contact the borrower, or that the borrower surrendered the  
            property.  That requirement raises two issues: (1) under  
            existing law, the borrower's surrender of the property is only  
            one of the three reasons why the contact requirements would  
            not otherwise apply; and (2) it discloses, in the public  
            record, that the borrower surrendered the property.

            This bill addresses those issues by, instead, requiring a  
            declaration only if the borrower was contacted, or if due  
            diligence was exercised to contact the borrower.  While that  
            resolves the privacy concerns, it would create some confusion  
            for those who examine the public record and are expecting to  
            see a declaration as part of the Notice of Default, but,  
            instead, see no such declaration.  To resolve those issues,  
            the following suggested amendments would, instead, require a  
            declaration that states either: (1) the borrower was  
            contacted; (2) due diligence efforts were made to contact the  
            borrower; or (3) that one of the three exceptions under  
            existing law (bankruptcy, surrender of property, or  
            contracting to extend the foreclosure process) applied.  The  
            sponsor of this section, the United Trustees, states that they  
            have no objection to these amendments:

             Suggested amendments  :

            1)  On page 4, strike out lines 6 through 8, inclusive, and  
            insert:
            
            authorized agent has contacted the borrower, has tried with  
            due diligence to contact the borrower as required by this  
            section, or that no contact was required pursuant to  
            subdivision (h).

            2)  On page 6, line 9, strike out "(b),"

            b.    Change to definition of borrower  

            While SB 1137 required a borrower to be contacted prior to the  
            filing of a Notice of Default, that bill did not specify what  
            should be done if there are multiple borrowers on note.  In  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 8 of ?



            order to partially address the issue of which borrowers must  
            be contacted, SB 306 would, instead, define borrower as a  
            "natural person or persons who are original signators to a  
            note or other obligation secured by a mortgage or deed of  
            trust on a residence . . ." Even with that revised definition,  
            it is unclear how many individuals must be contacted if  
            multiple individuals appear on the note, and raises an  
            additional policy question about whether contact should be  
            limited to original signators.  The sponsor has agreed to  
            strike the provision and to continue working with committee  
            staff and interested parties to resolve the issue:

             Suggested amendment:

             On page 4, strike out lines 24 through 28, inclusive, and  
            insert:

            (e) For purposes of this section, a "borrower" shall include a  
            mortgagor or trustor.

             c.    Restricting application to real property containing no  
               more than 4 units, and defining "owner-occupied"  

            The contact requirements imposed by SB 1137 were restricted to  
            those loans that appeared to be the most problematic - those  
            made between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007.  As the  
            intent of the legislation was to preserve home ownership, not  
            reward speculators, the language of the bill further limited  
            the contact requirement to owner-occupied residences, defined  
            as the principal residence of the borrower.

            This bill would make three substantive changes to those  
            provisions.  First, the type of residences would be limited to  
            those that are residential with one to four dwelling units.   
            The sponsor notes that this amendment is intended to address  
            the situation where an owner of a large apartment complex  
            moves into one of the units, thereby technically triggering  
            the contact requirements.  The sponsor further maintains that  
            condominiums would not be excluded by this restriction as they  
            are considered a single dwelling unit.

            Second, SB 306 would define "owner-occupied" as the residence  
            that is the principal residence of the borrower as indicated  
            to the lender in the loan documents.  The sponsor maintains  
            that this change would provide a bright-line rule for those  
            seeking to determine whether the contact requirements apply  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 9 of ?



            with respect to a particular loan.  It should be noted that  
            while an indication of "owner-occupied" in loan documents does  
            not necessarily mean that the property is currently, or was  
            ever, owner-occupied, the amended definition may cover more  
            properties than the definition in existing law.  Despite that  
            arguably broader coverage, this definition is different from  
            other definitions of "owner-occupied" currently in the code.  
            (For example, SBx2 7 (Corbett, 2009) applies if the "borrower  
            occupied the property as the borrower's principal residence at  
            the time the loan became delinquent.")

            This bill would also revise the loans subject to SB 1137's  
            contact requirements by including only those mortgages or  
            deeds of trust that were recorded between January 1, 2003 and  
            December 31, 2007 (existing law applies the requirements to  
            loans made between those dates).  That proposed clarification  
            seeks to use the public record to provide clarity with regard  
            to the loans for which the contact requirement applies.

            d.    Written consent to designation of HUD-certified housing  
            counseling agency 
             
            SB 1137 additionally required that a borrower be provided with  
            the toll-free telephone number to find a HUD-certified housing  
            counseling agency.  SB 1137 further allowed the borrower to  
            also designate a HUD-certified housing counseling agency, or  
            other advisor, to discuss, on the borrower's behalf, options  
            to avoid foreclosure.  This bill would revise that language  
            by, instead, requiring a borrower's written consent to that  
            designation, and adding that the HUD-certified housing  
            counseling agency, or other advisor, may discuss the  
            borrower's financial situation.
            e.   Reference to all investors under a pooling and servicing  
            agreement  

            This bill would additionally revise SB 1137's findings and  
            declarations regarding pooling and servicing agreements by  
            adding references to investors under a pooling and servicing  
            agreement (existing law only references parties in a loan  
            pool).  The sponsor, UTA, contends that this change is purely  
            technical and intended to reflect the difference between a  
            true security and a pool of private loans.   

            f.    Remaining changes are technical and clarifying  

            The remaining changes would, among other things, clarify that  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 10 of ?



            the 30-day time period runs from the time of initial contact,  
            clarify the bankruptcy exception, and clarify the mailing of  
            the notice to tenants. 

          3.    Changes relating to escrow  

          SB 306 would also amend provisions relating to payoff-demand  
          statements and clarify the coverage of the Escrow Agents'  
          Fidelity Corporation.  Those changes, as well as the above  
          amendments to SB 1137, were approved by the Senate Committee on  
          Banking, Finance and Insurance on April 1, 2009.

            a.   Payoff-demand statements  

            Existing law allows an entitled person, as defined, to request  
            a payoff demand statement that contains specified information,  
            including the amounts required as of the date of preparation  
            by the beneficiary, to fully satisfy all obligations secured  
            by the loan that is the subject of the payoff demand  
            statement.  While existing law provides that those statements  
            must be valid for no more than 30 days, there is no minimum  
            time period in which the statement must remain valid.  

            The California Escrow Association, sponsor of this section,  
                maintains that some lenders have begun providing payoff  
            statements to escrow agents that expire before the escrow  
            agent is able to disburse funds.  Escrow agents use those  
            statements to calculate how much money to disperse to each  
            party in real estate transactions involving mortgages.  To  
            address the issue, this bill would require payoff demand  
            statements to be valid for no less than the lesser of: (1) ten  
            days from date of preparation; or (2) the number of days from  
            the date of preparation until the terms of the note result in  
            a change in the per diem amount.  The sponsor states that  
            those changes "will give escrow officers the chance to close  
            transactions based upon the information in the demand  
            statements."

            This bill would also create a new payoff demand statement, the  
            "short-pay demand statement," which is intended to allow  
            escrow agents to obtain valid payoff statements during  
            short-sale transactions.  CEA notes that they have worked with  
            lender groups to provide this notification mechanism from  
            lenders, so that escrow agents know when they are authorized  
            to close transactions.  Those transactions have become  
            increasingly common as housing prices continue to fall as a  
                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 11 of ?



            result of the foreclosure and economic crisis.  

            b.    Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation  

            Created in 1982, the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation  
            serves to indemnify escrow agents that are members of the  
            corporation against certain losses.  EAFC membership is  
            required for each person licensed under the Escrow Law who  
            engages in the business of receiving escrows for deposit or  
            delivery in specified transactions, including real property  
            escrows.  This bill would exempt money or property held by or  
            deposited with a person acting as an exchange facilitator from  
            real property escrows for which EAFC is required to provide  
            coverage.  

            Those facilitators facilitate, for a fee, an exchange of  
            like-kind property in accordance with Internal Revenue Code  
            Section 1031.  The Internal Revenue Service's fact sheet on  
            like-kind exchanges notes while a taxpayer generally has to  
            pay tax on a gain at the time of sale, "Section 1031 provides  
            an exception and allows [a taxpayer] to postpone paying tax on  
            the gain if you reinvest the proceeds in similar property as  
            part of a qualifying like-kind exchange." In order for those  
            transactions to qualify for tax-preferred treatment, the  
            seller cannot have control over sales proceeds and must,  
            instead, transfer the proceeds to an individual (an exchange  
            facilitator) who holds them until the close of the 1031  
            exchange.

            The sponsor of this section, the EAFC, maintains that this  
            provision clarifies its belief that its coverage extends to  
            concurrent exchanges of real estate, not delayed exchanges,  
            such as Section 1031 exchanges.  The EAFC further notes that  
            persons handling delayed exchanges are separately regulated  
            under SB 1007 (Machado, Chapter 708, Statutes of 2008).


           Support  :   None Known

           Opposition  :  None Known

                                        HISTORY
           
           Source  : California Escrow Association; Escrow Agents Fidelity  
          Corporation; United Trustees Association

                                                                      



          SB 306 (Calderon)
          Page 12 of ?



           Related Pending Legislation  :  None Known

           Prior Legislation  :

          SB 1137 (Perata, Corbett, Machado, Chapter 69, Statutes of  
          2008), enacted changes to the procedures that must be followed  
          before the holder of a mortgage may issue a notice of default or  
          notice of trustee sale, requires the holder of a mortgage to  
          mail a specified notice to the tenant(s) of a property on which  
          foreclosure proceedings have begun, and imposes penalties on  
          property owners who fail to adequately maintain foreclosed  
          properties, as specified.

          SB 1007 (Machado, Chapter 708, Statutes of 2008), defined the  
          term exchange facilitator (EF), in connection with Section 1031  
          exchanges, enacted specified rules for EFs doing business in  
          California, and enacted specific prohibitions against certain  
          acts by EFs doing business in California.

          SBX2 7 (Corbett, Chapter 4, Statutes of 2009), provided that a  
          servicer of residential mortgage loans may not proceed with  
          foreclosure proceedings for 90 days under specified conditions,  
          unless the servicer has a comprehensive loan modification  
          program.

           Prior Vote  :

          Senate Committee on Banking, Finance, and Insurance (Ayes 9,  
          Noes 0)

                                   **************