BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 310|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 310
          Author:   Ducheny (D)
          Amended:  8/31/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 4/27/09
          AYES:  Simitian, Corbett, Hancock, Lowenthal, Pavley
          NOES:  Runner, Ashburn

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-5, 5/26/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza,  
            Wolk, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Denham, Runner, Walters, Wyland

           SENATE FLOOR  :  22-14, 6/2/09
          AYES:  Alquist, Cedillo, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Ducheny,  
            Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete  
            McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Romero, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Correa, Cox,  
            Denham, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Runner, Strickland,  
            Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Dutton, Maldonado, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  42-28, 9/3/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Water quality:  stormwater and other runoff

           SOURCE  :     California Major Builders Council
                      California Building Industry Association

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 310
                                                                Page  
          2


           DIGEST  :    This bill allows local government agencies that  
          have permits for stormwater systems to voluntarily create a  
          watershed improvement plan to improve stormwater  
          management.  The bill allows participating agencies to  
          assess fees on activities that generate stormwater  
          pollution to pay for the implementation of plans approved  
          by the regional water board.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) require entities that develop the  
          plan that is submitted to a regional water quality control  
          board (RWQCB) for approval to reimburse the RWQCB for its  
          costs in accordance with a fee schedule adopted by the  
          RWQCB, and (2) make clarifying changes.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing Law

           1.Establishes a national objective, in conjunction with  
            numerous implementing provisions, to restore and maintain  
            the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the  
            nation's wasters pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution  
            Control Act, also referred to as the Clean Water Act  
            (CWA) (33 U.S.C., 1251(a) et seq.).

          2.Establishes the State Water Resources Control Board  
            (SWRCB) as the water pollution control agency for all  
            purposes of the federal Clean Water Act which is  
            authorized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  
            (U.S. EPA) to administer the National Pollutant  
            Elimination System (NPDES) program in California,  
            pursuant to 402 of the CWA.

          3.Establishes a system of water quality control that  
            provides for 10 water RWQCBs which are responsible for  
            protecting water quality through the adoption of  
            region-specific water quality control plans (also  
            referred to as basin plans) containing beneficial use  
            designations, water quality objectives, and implementing  
            programs, pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality  
            Control Act of 1969 (Division 7 of the California Water  
            Code).








                                                                SB 310
                                                                Page  
          3

          4.Requires each RWQCB to adopt a water quality control plan  
            for its region for the reasonable protection of  
            beneficial uses of water in that region and the  
            prevention of nuisance.

          5.Authorizes RWQCBs to investigate the quality of state  
            waters, and grants to a RWQCB certain authority in  
            connection with those investigative functions.

          6.Authorizes RWQCBs to administratively impose civil  
            liability in connection with violations of certain water  
            quality provisions.

          7.Requires RWQCBs to obtain coordinated action in water  
            quality control, including prevention and abatement of  
            water pollution and nuisance.

          8.Requires the SWRCB to report information regarding water  
            quality and related enforcement activities.

          9.Establishes regional water management plans, pursuant to  
            the Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Act of  
            2003, to facilitate the development of integrated  
            regional water management plans, to maximize the quality  
            and quantity of water available to meet the state's water  
            needs by providing a framework for local agencies to  
            integrate programs and projects that protect and enhance  
            regional water supplies (Water Code 10530 et seq.).  

           This bill:

          1.Authorizes a city, county and special district that is a  
            permittee or co-permittee under an NPDES permit for a  
            municipal stormwater system to develop a watershed  
            improvement plan, as specified.

          2.Requires RWQCBs to review and approve a watershed  
            improvement plan if they find that the proposed plan will  
            facilitate compliance with one or more water quality  
            requirements.

          3.Requires a RWQCB to review each watershed improvement  
            plan developed and approve it if it finds that the  
            proposed watershed improvement plan will facilitate  







                                                                SB 310
                                                                Page  
          4

            compliance with one or more water quality requirements.   
            Require the SWRCB to establish, via emergency  
            regulations, a fee schedule for RWQCB's review of a  
            watershed improvement plan.

          4.Requires a RWQCB to review each watershed improvement  
            plan developed and approve it if it finds that the  
            proposed plan will facilitate compliance with one or more  
            water quality requirements.

          5.Authorizes RWQCBs to participate in the preparation of a  
            watershed improvement plan.

          6.Authorizes a county, city or specified district, or  
            combination thereof, to impose fees on activities that  
            generate or contribute to runoff, stormwater, or surface  
            runoff pollution to pay the costs of the preparation of a  
            watershed improvement plan or the implementation of a  
            plan.

          7 Authorizes a county, city, or special district, or  
            combination thereof, to plan, design, implement,  
            construct, operate, and maintain controls and facilities  
            to improve water quality.
           
          Comments

           According to the author's office, the purpose of this  
          legislation is to maintain existing regulatory  
          requirements, while putting California in a leadership role  
          in stormwater management through facilitating city, county,  
          and other municipal stormwater permittees' adoption of  
          cooperative watershed-based stormwater management programs.  
           The intent is to establish multiple watershed-based pilot  
          programs that would demonstrate more effective ways to  
          isolate receiving waters from impact sources.

          Although there are a number of existing watershed and river  
          enhancement groups in California, the focus of this  
          legislation is upon the municipal stormwater permitees that  
          have legal and regulatory responsibilities under the Clean  
          Water Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act.  
           It is not intended to change or reduce municipal  
          permittees obligations under those acts or to change the  







                                                                SB 310
                                                                Page  
          5

          roles of the SWRCB and RWQCBs.  Its goal is to promote the  
          development of cooperative watershed approaches that will  
          reduce urban storm water volumes, reduce urban runoff  
          pollutants and provide adequate, reliable funding to meet  
          water quality requirements.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this  
          bill will result in the following fiscal effects: 

          1. Potential long-term Waste Discharge Fund savings of an  
             unknown amount resulting from more effective stormwater  
             management and an associated reduction in water quality  
             violation enforcement actions. 

          2. Annual cost in 2009-10 through 2012-13, ranging from  
             approximately $150,000 to $450,000 (Waste Discharge  
             Fund), to the RWQCB to participate in the development of  
             watershed improvement plans and to review them.  Thus  
             bill directs these RWQCB costs to be reimbursed by the  
             local government(s) responsible for developing the  
             plans. 

          3. Annual costs in 2009-10 through 2012-13, ranging from  
             $300,000 to $550,000 (Waste Discharge Fund), to the  
             SWRCB for program oversight and coordination. 

          4. Local costs of an unknown amount, potentially in the  
             millions of  dollars, to the extent local governments  
             develop watershed improvement plans and the scope of  
             those plans. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/4/09)

          California Major Builders Council (co-source)
          California Building Industry Association (co-source)
          California Association of Realtors
          Industrial Governmental Association
          Western Municipal Water District

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  9/4/09)








                                                                SB 310
                                                                Page  
          6

          Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Supporters believes that by  
          providing a voluntary mechanism for more comprehensive  
          storm water management planning and by providing a viable,  
          ongoing means for sufficient and sustained funding to  
          implement these plans, this bill represents an innovative  
          option for storm water permittees to meet water quality  
          requirements.  This bill will also result in substantial  
          environmental benefits.  In addition, because local  
          government entities will be doing better planning on a  
          watershed basis, the money will result in superior results  
          for less cost.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers  
          Association states their opposition as follows:

          "Specifically, our objection is found in Section 16103.   
          The last sentence in this section purports to statutorily  
          label such fees 'user-based or regulatory fees.'  However,  
          they are not legitimate fees at all, not regulatory fees,  
          and not user fees.  They are not limited to polluters, or  
          persons who subscribe to a service, but would finance the  
          construction of public facilities and be collected from  
          every developed property on which rain falls.  Such a levy  
          is either a tax or perhaps an assessment, but not a fee."  
           

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Arambula, Beall, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Carter, Chesbro, Coto, De La Torre,  
            Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, John A. Perez, V.  
            Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana,  
            Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Yamada,  
            Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, Duvall, Emmerson, Fletcher,  
            Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey,  
            Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, Silva, Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ammiano, Charles Calderon, Davis, De  
            Leon, DeVore, Evans, Galgiani, Huber, Skinner, Vacancy







                                                                SB 310
                                                                Page  
          7



          TSM:cm  9/4/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****