BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 313|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 313
          Author:   DeSaulnier (D)
          Amended:  4/27/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LAB. & INDUS. RELAT. COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 4/29/09
          AYES: DeSaulnier, Wyland, Ducheny, Hollingsworth, Leno, Yee

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8


           SUBJECT  :    Workers compensation:  penalty assessments

           SOURCE  :     Small Business California


           DIGEST  :    This bill increases the per-employee penalty for  
          the lack of workers' compensation coverage from $1000 to  
          $1500.  This bill provides the Director of the Department  
          of Industrial Relations with the option to issue a penalty  
          assessment order, as specified.  This bill also establishes  
          the period for the prorating of back premiums at three  
          years and provides for associated penalty assessments, as  
          specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Requires every employer, except the state, to secure the  
             payment of workers' compensation for employees for  
             injuries arising out of, or in the course of,  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 313
                                                                Page  
          2

             employment.

          2. Specifies that the director of the Department of  
             Industrial Relation shall issue and serve a penalty  
             assessment order of $1000 per employee on an employer  
             who is found to be without workers' compensation  
             insurance and on whom a stop-work order has been imposed  
             due to the lack of such coverage.  The collected monies  
             are deposited in the Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust  
             Fund (Fund).   The monies in the Fund are collected  
             through a basic charge on all employers, supplemented by  
             the fines and penalties. 

          3. Provides that at any time that the director determines  
             that an employer has been uninsured for a period in  
             excess of one week during the calendar year preceding  
             the director's determination, the director may issue and  
             serve a penalty assessment order that requires the  
             uninsured employer to pay to the director, for deposit  
             into the State Treasury to the credit of the Uninsured  
             Employers Fund, the greater of: (a) twice the amount the  
             employer would have paid in workers' compensation  
             premiums during the period the employer was uninsured or  
             (b) the sum of one thousand dollars per employee  
             employed during the period the employer was uninsured.   
             This penalty shall be in lieu of, and not in addition to  
             any other penalty imposed under the section of law  
             described in #2, above.

          4. Provides that if the employer is currently insured, or  
             becomes insured during the period during which the above  
             penalty is being determined, the amount an employer  
             would have paid in workers' compensation premiums shall  
             be calculated by prorating the current premium for the  
             number of weeks the employer was uninsured.

          5. Provides that if the employer is uninsured at the time  
             the above penalty is being determined, the amount an  
             employer would have paid in workers' compensation  
             premiums shall be calculated by applying the rating for  
             that type/class of worker as determined by the Workers'  
             Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB) and the  
             Insurance Commissioner to the number of weeks the  
             employer was uninsured.







                                                                SB 313
                                                                Page  
          3


          6. Provides that if the employer contends that the  
             assignment of the governing classification is incorrect,  
             or that any employee should be assigned to a different  
             classification, the employer has the burden to prove  
             that the different classification should be utilized.

          This bill:

          1. Increases the per-employee penalty for the lack of  
             workers' compensation coverage from $1000 to $1500.

          2. Provides the director of the Department of Industrial  
             Relations with the option to issue a penalty assessment  
             order either:

             A.    Under the provisions related to a stop-work  
                order and the $1500 penalty.

             B.    Under the provisions setting forth the procedure  
                for securing payment of unpaid workers'  
                compensation premiums in conjunction with the  
                per-employee penalty.

          3. Establishes the period for the prorating of back  
             premiums at three years.

          4. Provides that if the employer is uninsured at the time  
             the above penalty is being determined, the amount an  
             employer would have paid in workers' compensation  
             premiums shall be the product of the employer's payroll  
             within the three-year period immediately prior to the  
             date the above penalty assessment is issued multiplied  
             by a rate determined in accordance with regulation that  
             may be adopted by the Labor Commissioner or, if none has  
             been adopted, the average insurer rate per $100 of  
             payroll as reported in the most recent summary published  
             by the rating organization designated by the Insurance  
             Commissioner (i.e. the WCIRB). 

          5. Deletes the provisions regarding the governing  
             classification to which each employee of an uninsured  
             employer shall be assumed to be assigned under the  
             provisions of this section.







                                                                SB 313
                                                                Page  
          4


           Comments
           
          In addition to enhancing the penalties for employer  
          non-compliance with worker's compensation law, this bill  
          attempts to fix an unintended conflict in Labor Code  
          Section 3722 as reported by the Division of Labor Standards  
          Enforcement and the Commission on Health and Safety and  
          Workers Compensation.  This unintended conflict may be  
          explained as follows:

          1. Labor Code Section 3722(a) provides that the director  
             shall issue a penalty assessment of $1000 where he/she  
             has identified an employer who is not providing workers'  
             compensation coverage for employees and where the  
             director has issued a stop-work order on the employer  
             for lack of such coverage.  

          2. Labor Code Section 3722(b) provides for a procedure for  
             determining what back premium payments are owed by the  
             employer and requires payment of premiums and specified  
             penalties.  But this subsection also states that its  
             penalties may not be in addition to penalties assessed  
             under 3722(a).

          3. Since Labor Code 3722(a) specifies that in the case  
             where the director is required to issue a stop-work  
             order the director must issue a penalty order of $1000,  
             there remains no option for the director to require  
             payment of back premiums and associated penalty  
             assessments because 3722(b) prohibits any penalty  
             imposed in addition to that in 3722(a).  

          4. Thus, in effect, in cases involving required stop orders  
             often, egregious examples no back premiums and  
             associated penalties may be collected.

          Finally, an additional problem with the existing law is  
          that it may be difficult for enforcement agencies to  
          determine what premiums may be owed because this requires  
          an evaluation of how many workers were on a payroll over a  
          lengthy period in the past, what type of work they were  
          doing, and what rating they would each have had as  
          determined under the rating plan devised by the Workers'  







                                                                SB 313
                                                                Page  
          5

          Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau all in consultation  
          with the Insurance Commissioner.  This bill provides for a  
          simpler and more efficacious means of assessing premiums  
          and penalties owing.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/19/09)

          Small Business California (source)
          Acclamation Insurance Management Services
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          CAL Insurance and Associates, Inc.
          California Applicants' Attorneys Association
          California Association of Psychiatric Technicians
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
          California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO
          Efficiency Data & Development
          Glendale City Employees Association
          Organization of SMUD Employees
          Safeway Inc.
          San Bernardino Public Employees Association
          San Luis Obispo County Employees Association 
          Santa Rosa City Employees Association

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office and supporters  
          of this bill, believe the bill creates a more effective  
          penalty structure for employers that fail to maintain  
          workers' compensation coverage.  They argue that under the  
          current scheme employers may face a penalty that is less  
          than what their workers' compensation costs would have,  
          thus creating a disincentive to have coverage.  Other  
          proponents say that certain employers' failure to maintain  
          coverage creates an unfair competitive advantage for  
          violators of the law.  Further, the money recovered by the  
          penalties will be deposited into the Fund.  This fund  
          provides benefits to the injured employees of illegally  
          uninsured employers, and most that funding comes from a  
          levy on law-abiding employers.  This bill reduces the  
          amount law-abiding employers have to pay to the Fund.








                                                                SB 313
                                                                Page  
          6


          AGB:do  5/19/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****