BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 321
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 19, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                    SB 321 (Benoit) - As Amended:  July 15, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                             Local Government  
          Vote:        7-0
                       Elections and Redistricting            7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill imposes additional requirements on local governments  
          when conducting assessment ballot proceedings pursuant to  
          Proposition 218.  Specifically, the bill:   

          1)Requires the phrase "OFFICIAL BALLOT ENCLOSED" to be printed,  
            in no smaller than 16-point bold type, on envelopes mailed to  
            property owners containing the notices and assessment ballots.  
            Permits the phrase to be printed in language other than  
            English, if the local agency deems the translation to be  
            appropriate.

          2)States that if the agency uses agency personnel for the ballot  
            tabulation or if the agency contracts with a vendor for the  
            ballot tabulation and the vendor or its affiliates  
            participated in the research, design, engineering, public  
            education, or promotion of the assessment, the ballots shall  
            be unsealed and tabulated in public view so as to permit all  
            interested persons to monitor the accuracy of the tabulation  
            process. 

          3)Requires the information used to determine the weight assigned  
            to each vote be public and made equally available to  
            proponents and opponents (see discussion below).  

          4)Requires ballots to be preserved for at least two years and  
            references the statutes under which agencies may dispose of  
            the ballots after that time.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  








                                                                  SB 321
                                                                  Page  2


          Local costs not state-reimbursable, as local agencies have  
          authority to levy fees to cover the costs of the assessment  
          ballots.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  . In November 1996, California voters approved  
            Proposition 218, a constitutional amendment which restricted  
            local officials' ability to impose taxes, assessments, and  
            property-related fees, and imposed various voter approval  
            requirements on these levies. 

            This bill deals with the voter procedures for assessments,  
            which are levies or charges on real property by an agency for  
            a special benefit conferred upon that property.  Prior to  
            imposing an assessment, the agency must mail a notice to all  
            the property owners subject to the assessment along with a  
            ballot on which the property owner can indicate his or her  
            support of or opposition to the proposed assessment.  Each  
            ballot is weighted based on the amount of the assessment for  
            that property owner.  Not sooner than 45 days after mailing  
            the notice and ballots to property owners, the agency must  
            conduct a public hearing on the proposed assessment.  Upon  
            conclusion of that public hearing, the assessment may not be  
            imposed if ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment  
            exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment,  
            factoring in the appropriate weight for each ballot.  
            Assessment ballot proceedings are not considered elections.

           2)Rationale  . The author asserts that the bill is necessary to  
            ensure the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the  
            benefit assessment election process. The author also indicates  
            that many property owners may discard benefit assessment  
            ballots that they receive in the mail thinking that the  
            contents are "junk mail". This bill attempts to remedy this  
            situation by clearly marking the envelope as an official  
            ballot.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081