BILL ANALYSIS
SB 323
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 19, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
SB 323 (Oropeza) - As Amended: July 15, 2009
Policy Committee: Revenue and
Taxation Vote: 6-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes a taxpayer to direct any portion of their
personal income tax refunds into a qualified tuition program
(QTP) account. Specifically, the bill:
1)Requires the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to modify its income
tax form to include information necessary to facilitate such a
designation, which would be limited to one QTP account per
return.
2)Requires the Scholarshare Investment Board (Board) to
reimburse FTB through an interagency agreement for the actual
cost of implementing this bill, up to $475,000. Specifies that
the reimbursement shall be applied to the fiscal year in which
FTB incurs the costs.
3)Sunsets on December 31, 2014.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)FTB estimates one-time costs of approximately $373,000 and
ongoing costs of $51,000 (GF) to administer this refund
program. This includes expenses for programming changes to
computer systems, additional customer service contacts from
taxpayers, and transferring funds to QTP accounts.
2)Implementation costs could be greater if FTB is required to
redirect staffing from revenue producing activities to
implement program (see Comment #3 below.)
SB 323
Page 2
3)Costs up to $475,000 would be reimbursed from the Scholarshare
Administrative Fund (special fund). However, the balance (at
least $100,000) would be borne by the GF.
4)Less than $10,000 reduction in state revenues to the extent
refunds diverted into QTP accounts would have otherwise been
invested in taxable accounts.
COMMENTS
1)Background . Qualified Tuition Programs (QTPs) are established
and maintained by the state to encourage savings for
education. Under federal and state law, contributions to a QTP
(also known as a "529" plan) are made after taxes have been
paid and are not deductible. However, income earned on the
accounts and distributions from the accounts is tax free.
2)Rationale . This bill, sponsored by the state treasurer, is
intended to encourage taxpayers to save for future educational
expenses for themselves or their dependents. The author points
out that the cost of a college education has risen faster than
consumer prices and states that this bill one way to help
families address these rising costs.
3)Concerns . FTB indicates that, given budget cuts and furloughs,
implementation of this bill beginning in 2010 will not be
possible without approval of additional positions, unless the
board redirects staff and resources from other higher priority
activities.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081