BILL ANALYSIS
SB 374
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 15, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
SB 374 (Calderon) - As Amended: June 24, 2009
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 6 - 3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill establishes educational and training requirements for
personal trainers (PTs) and after January 1, 2012, prohibits a
person from calling themselves a PT unless they meet the
requirements. Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires a PT to have a bachelor's degree in exercise science
or a closely related field, or be certified by an accredited
organization.
2)Exempts individuals who only provide training in a particular
discipline such as yoga or pilates.
3)Establishes administrative fines for violations of these
provisions.
4)Requires the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA), upon
appropriation of necessary funds from the Legislature, to
investigate complaints pertaining to PTs, refer them to the
appropriate district attorney's office, and collect
administrative fines.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)On-going costs in excess of $400,000 per year for the workload
associated with DCA reviewing complaints, maintaining required
documentation, forwarding complaints to appropriate district
attorneys' offices, and collecting fines.
2)Unknown, likely moderate reimbursable mandate costs associated
with district attorneys' offices investigating complaints and
SB 374
Page 2
enforcing the provisions of this legislation.
3)Annual administrative fine revenue of approximately $600,000,
of which $300,000 will be provided to DCA to offset the costs
of the program and $300,000 will be provided to the
appropriate district attorneys to offset the costs of their
investigations.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The intent of this legislation is to
professionalize personal trainers and allow those with
appropriate training and expertise to stand out from those who
may not be appropriately trained by limiting the use of the
term PT to individuals who meet certain education and training
criteria. The author contends that "this will help customers
make informed choices about who they pick to train them.
Further, this also helps reputable trainers by making sure
they stand out from trainers with less education and
training."
2)Opposition . DCA, in opposition to this legislation, questions
"the severity of the issues regarding personal trainers, and
the causal link between the injuries the author cites and
personal trainers. For one thing the Department is not aware
of significant harm done by personal trainers. It should be
pointed out that any time an individual engages in strenuous
exercise, there is a risk of injury. It is also worth noting
that this bill does not provide for any enforcement of its
provisions, which might mitigate much of what this bill seeks
to do. Lastly, the Department believes that this bill could
result in less consumer choice, and higher prices for personal
training services. For these reasons, the Department does not
believe that placing the regulatory burdens this bill would
impose on PTs is justified at this time."
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081