BILL ANALYSIS
SB 435
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 4, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 435 (Pavley) - As Amended: June 30, 2010
Policy Committee:
TransportationVote:8-4
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires motorcycles registered in the state and
manufactured on and after January 1, 2011 to have a federal U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exhaust emission label.
Specifically, the bill:
1)Establishes that a violation of the labeling requirement is a
mechanical violation, meaning that a peace officer is
prohibited from stopping a motorcycle solely on a suspicion of
a violation of this labeling requirement
2)Authorizes the court to dismiss the penalty on a first
violation upon correction of the violation.
3)Establishes a violation of this law as punishable by the same
fine currently established pursuant to the equipment
anti-tampering law (currently between $50 and $100 for a first
offense and $100 to $250 for second and subsequent offenses.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)No state costs. Local enforcement costs not reimbursable.
2)Unknown, potentially significant increase in fine and penalty
revenues related to violations of labeling requirement.
COMMENTS
1)Background . Existing federal regulations require a motorcycle
manufactured after January 1, 1983 to meet specified noise
emissions standards, and requires that labels be affixed to
SB 435
Page 2
the motorcycle indicating that it meets these standards.
California's anti-tampering law prohibits the installation,
sale, or advertisement of any device intended to modify the
original design or performance of the motor vehicle pollution
control system. It also requires a motorcycle to be equipped
with a muffler that prevents excessive or unusual noise, and
prohibits the modification of the exhaust system in a manner
that amplifies the noise emitted by the motor to the extent
that it exceeds noise limits.
2)Rationale . The bill is intended to give state law enforcement
the ability to enforce federal emissions-related regulation
and state anti-tampering laws. The author asserts that these
regulations and laws, though on the books for many years, are
infrequently enforced. She contends this bill takes a modest
approach, by making the violations a secondary infraction, and
applying only prospectively to newly manufactured motorcycles.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081