BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                                  SENATE HUMAN
                               SERVICES COMMITTEE
                            Senator Carol Liu, Chair


          BILL NO:       SB 452                                       
          S
          AUTHOR:        Dutton                                       
          B
          VERSION:       April 13, 2009
          HEARING DATE:  April 14, 2009                               
          4
          FISCAL:        To Judiciary                                 
          5
                                                                      
          2
          CONSULTANT:                                                
          Hailey
                                        

                                     SUBJECT
                                         
            At-risk children: registration of birth: notification to  
                           child protective services

                                     SUMMARY  

          Requires the state registrar of vital statistics to notify  
          the appropriate child protective services agency of the  
          birth of a child to a parent who has had his or her  
          parental rights terminated due to abuse or neglect of a  
          child, and requires that agency to conduct an immediate  
          investigation to ensure the infant's safety and well-being.

                                     ABSTRACT  

           Current law  :
          1.  Prescribes the duties of the state registrar of vital  
          statistics and local registrars of births and deaths with  
          respect to the registration of a live birth.

          2.  Requires the State Department of Social Services (DSS)  
          to implement a statewide child welfare services case  
          management system for the effective administration of child  
          welfare services.

                                                         Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 452 (Dutton)            Page  
          2


          

          3.  Provides that counties shall be the arm of the state  
          for the provision of child welfare services.

          4.  Provides for hearings in the juvenile court that can  
          allow the court to permanently terminate the rights of a  
          parent or parents.

           This bill  :
          1.  Requires the state registrar of vital statistics to  
          cross check the names of parents of newly-born infants with  
          the names of parents who have previously had their parental  
          rights terminated due to abuse or neglect.

          2.  Requires the state registrar of vital statistics to  
          forward to the appropriate local child protective services  
          agency the names of parents so identified.
          3.  Requires county child protective services agencies,  
          upon receipt of the information from the state registrar of  
          vital statistics, to conduct an immediate investigation to  
          ensure the safety and well-being of the infant.

                                  FISCAL IMPACT  

          Unknown

                            BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION  

          The author states that "there are too many instances of  
          children being needlessly and severely abused by parents  
          who previously had their parental rights terminated.  By  
          notifying child protective services when these parents have  
          a new baby, the number of child abuse cases could be  
          reduced."  The author reports instances of serial child  
          abuse by parents, and notes that Minnesota and Michigan  
          have laws similar to that proposed by this bill.

           Sibling groups in foster care
           According to the State Department of Social Services (DSS),  
          almost 70 percent of the children in foster care have a  
          sibling who is also in the child welfare system: of the  
          66,500 children in foster care, 45,500 are siblings to at  
          least one other child in foster care.

           Children who enter foster care after a sibling is already  
          entered




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 452 (Dutton)            Page  
          3


          

           An analysis of data from New York City, reported to the  
          committee by researchers at the Center for Social Services  
          Research, at the University of California, Berkeley, found  
          that nearly half of the children in foster care have been  
          preceded by or will be followed by a sibling entering care.

          The committee has asked DSS to provide a breakout to tell  
          us how many children entered foster care at the same time  
          as at least one sibling and how many entered foster care  
          after a sibling was already in foster care.  These data  
          will not be available by the time of the hearing.   
          Researchers at the UC Berkeley's Center for Social Services  
          Research also report that they are proposing changes in the  
          child welfare services case management system so that  
          questions of siblings' involvement in foster care can be  
          more easily tracked.

          The research questions are not always easy to frame and  
          answer: for example, definitions of "sibling" vary in  
          states' statutes and in research; and, tracking young  
          children who already have a sibling in foster care at the  
          time of their referral to child protective services may not  
          include any siblings already in adoptive placement.   
          However, a general portrait of the extent of serial abuse  
          and neglect should materialize soon.

           Arguments in support:
           Anecdotal evidence finds that there are infants each year  
          who are abused, some fatally, by a parent who previously  
          had his or her parental rights terminated.  Visits by child  
          protective services workers to the home of an infant with  
          such a parent would reduce incidences of abuse and neglect,  
          either by saving babies from dangerous situations or  
          enabling social workers to connect parents voluntarily to  
          helpful community resources.

           Arguments in opposition:
           The California Association of Counties and the County  
          Welfare Directors Association believes that counties have  
          no authority to insist that a parent cooperate with a  
          presumptive investigation, that such investigations would  
          be costly, and that less-costly alternatives exist to  
          provide services to at-risk families.

          The American Civil Liberties Union believes the bill, as  




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 452 (Dutton)            Page  
          4


          

          introduced, raises Fourth Amendment concerns of unwarranted  
          government intrusion into families' lives, takes county  
          resources away from investing reports of abuse and neglect,  
          and gives no opportunity for a person to challenge their  
          inclusion in the child welfare services case management  
          system database.


                          QUESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
           
          1.  The committee may want to ask the author of a  
          representative of DSS to describe the current status of the  
          state's child welfare services data management system as it  
          relates to the challenges presented by this bill:
                 Are all parents in the system whose parental rights  
               have been terminated because of abuse or neglect?  How  
               far back do the records go?
                 Is the information about a parent that is included  
               in a live birth record sufficient to match the  
               identity of a person listed in the child welfare  
               services data management system?
                 Can the provisions of this bill be implemented  
               immediately or will implementation be delayed until  
               changes are made in that data management system?

                                    POSITIONS  

          Support:       San Bernardino County Sheriff-Coroner

          Oppose:   American Civil Liberties Union, California  
          Legislative Office
                         California State Association of Counties
                         County Welfare Directors Association
                         Service Employees International Union




                                   -- END --