BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: sb 455
          SENATOR ALAN LOWENTHAL, CHAIRMAN               AUTHOR:  Lowenthal
                                                         VERSION: 4/16/09
          Analysis by: Art Bauer                         FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date: April 21, 2009









          SUBJECT:

          High-speed rail

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill provides the High-Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) with  
          certain eminent domain powers, establishes a policy for  
          prioritizing investments, and provides a process for reporting  
          on the progress of the high-speed rail project.

          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law:
           
             1.   Creates the HSRA with a nine member governing board,  
               including five members appointed by the governor, two  
               members appointed by the Senate Rules Committee, and two  
               members appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.

             2.   Authorizes the HSRA to develop a high-speed rail system  
               extending from San Diego to Sacramento with Phase I being  
               between Anaheim-Los Angeles Union  
               Station-Bakersfield-Fresno-San Jose-San Francisco Transbay  
               Terminal. Proposition 1A, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed  
               Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, approved by  
               the voters last November provides up to $9 billion for the  
               development of the high-speed rail system.

             3.   Requires the approval of the Department of General  
               Services (DGS) before a state agency may acquire, or  
               dispose, of real property but exempts real property  




          SB 455 (LOWENTHAL)                                        Page 2

                                                                       


               obtained for highway purposes by the Department of  
               Transportation (Caltrans).

             4.   Assigns various authorities to the Department of Finance  
               (DOF), to DGS, and to the State Public Works Board (SPWB)  
               related to the acquisition of property and the development  
               of infrastructure projects, but exempts Caltrans and other  
               large state agencies from these authorities.

             5.   Requires DGS to inventory state-owned property, other  
               than property owned by Caltrans. 

             6.   Requires the approval of DOF and SPWB before a state  
               agency may expend funds from an appropriation for capital  
               outlay purposes, but exempts Caltrans? the University of  
               California, the California State University, and the  
               community colleges from this provision.
           
          This bill:
           
               1.     In regard to property matters:

               a.     Exempts the HSRA from various statutory provisions  
                 related to the acquisition and disposal of property that  
                 requires the approval of the DOF. 

               b.     Exempts the HSRA from securing the approval of DOF  
                 or SPWB when expending funds appropriated for capital  
                 outlay purposes. 

               c.     Authorizes the HSRA to acquire an easement or  
                 right-of-way without the securing the approval of the  
                 director of DGS. 

               d.     Prohibits the director of DGS from granting  
                 easements across the property of the HSRA. 

               e.     Authorizes the HSRA to negotiate, in the name of the  
                 state, access to right-of-way it owns, including the  
                 value of the right of access. The revenue received shall  
                 be deposited in the State Transportation Fund.

               f.     Prohibits DGS from maintaining a property inventory  
                 of the property owned by the HSRA.

               1.     Requires the five gubernatorial appointees to the  




          SB 455 (LOWENTHAL)                                        Page 3

                                                                       


                 HSRA to be confirmed by the Senate.

             2.   Establishes criteria for making investments with any  
               funds may available to Phase I of the high-speed rail  
               project, including:

               a      Enhancement of railroad access to stations and  
                 terminals, with priority be given to those facilities  
                 that serve the largest employment centers.

               b      Improvements to travel time, service reliability,  
                 safety, and service frequency for existing commuter and  
                 intercity passenger trains services.

               c      Improvement of the connection from the San Joaquin  
                 Valley to Southern California and from the San Joaquin  
                 Valley to the Bay Area.

             1.   Requires changes in contracts entered into by the HSRA  
               be approved by its governing board.

             2.   Requires the creation of an overall project schedule  
               with project delivery milestones for all aspects of the  
               high-speed rail project and the identification of the  
               elements of the project schedule that are critical to  
               ensuring the project remains on schedule. A report of on  
               the status of the schedule shall be made to the HSRA  
               governing board, with copies of the report being submitted  
               quarterly to the Legislature and the Legislative Analyst  
               Office.

           COMMENTS:

              1.   Purpose  . This bill provides the HSRA with authority to  
               facilitate the development of the high-speed rail service,  
               establishes legislative priorities for high-speed rail  
               investments, and provides a structure to ensure  
               accountability in the performance of its functions and  
               activities.

               The Senate Transportation and Housing Committee has held  
               four oversight hearings on the HSRA in the last eighteen  
               months. It is clear from the hearings that the HSRA is  
               unequipped to move from a planning and promotional entity  
               to a project development entity without additional  
               authority and a structure of accountability. The passage of  




          SB 455 (LOWENTHAL)                                        Page 4

                                                                       


               Proposition 1A now requires the creation of a structure of  
               accountability within the HSRA. 

              2.   Management of Property . The HSRA staff has asked for  
               amendments to existing law that conforms the HSRA's  
               authority to that of Caltrans and other large state  
               agencies that develop large construction projects. The  
               basic laws governing these activities involve DGS, SPWB,  
               and DOF taking certain actions regarding property or the  
               contracting of professional and construction services for  
               most state agencies. Caltrans, the University of  
               California, and other large agencies are exempt form this  
               body of law and follow other procedures. 

              3.   Appointees require confirmation  . When the HSRA was first  
               established it was intended to expire after a period of  
               years. In 2002, legislation made HSRA permanent. With the  
               approval of Proposition 1A, it is appropriate to address  
               the appointment process for the governing board of the  
               HSRA. To this end, requiring the confirmation of the  
               governor's appointees is a standard practice. For example,  
               the Energy Commission, the California Transportation  
               Commission, and other state boards and commissions have  
               legislative appointees with gubernatorial appointees who  
               require confirmation by the Senate. 

              4.   Project priorities  . Proposition 1A allows the  
               Legislature to establish expenditure priorities for the  
               high-speed rail project. Without the establishment of  
               priorities for expending bond proceeds, there is the  
               possibility projects may be constructed and remained unused  
               for several years until the high-speed rail project is  
               completed and service actually begins. This bill endeavors  
               to ensure that projects built with bond proceeds have value  
               to Californians at the time the project is constructed. It  
               is for this reason that bill emphasizes that project built  
               for high-speed rail can be used for existing intercity and  
               commuter rail services until there is high-speed rail  
               service 

              5.   Managerial accountability  . With the HSRA becoming a  
               project development entity, it is necessary to ensure that  
               its activities regarding the management of contracts,  
               project budgets, and schedule are systemized and  
               transparent.  This avoids surprises if projects are delayed  
               or encounter budgetary problems. SB 66 (Torlakson), Chapter  




          SB 455 (LOWENTHAL)                                        Page 5

                                                                       


               375, Statutes of 2005, requires quarterly reports to the  
               Legislature on the status, including changes to the scope,  
               schedule and budget, of the Bay Bridge project. The  
               requirements of this bill are consistent with the practices  
               established for that project. 
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the Committee before noon on  
          Wednesday, 
                     April 15, 2009)

               SUPPORT:  None received.

               OPPOSED:  None received.